Complex modulation of fingertip forces during precision grasp and lift after theta burst stimulation over the dorsal premotor cortex

Dragana Drljačić; Sanja Pajić; Aleksandar Nedeljković; Sladjan D Milanović; Tihomir V Ilić

doi:10.2298/VSP151120249D

Dragana Drljačić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education Belgrade Serbia; Preschool Teacher Training College, Šabac, Serbia.
Sanja Pajić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Belgrade, Serbia
Aleksandar Nedeljković University of Belgrade, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education Belgrade Serbia
Sladjan D Milanović University of Belgrade, Institute for Medical Research, Belgrade, Serbia.
Tihomir V Ilić Clinic of Neurology, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP151120249D

Keywords: motor cortex, transcranial magnetic stimulation, hand strength,

Abstract

Background/Aim. Adaptive control and fingertip force synchronization of precise grasp stability during unimanual manipulation of small objects represents an illustrative example of highly fractionated movements that are foundation of fine motor control. It is assumed that this process is controlled by several motor areas of the frontal lobe, particularly applicable to the primary motor (M-1) and dorsal premotor cortex (PMd). Aiming to examine the role of PMd during fine coordination of fingertip forces we applied theta burst repetitive magnetic stimulation (TBS) to disrupt neural processing in that cortical area. Methods. Using a single-blind, randomized, crossover design, 10 healthy subjects (29 ± 3.9 years) received single sessions of continuous TBS (cTBS600), intermittent TBS (iTBS600), or sham stimulation, separate from one another at least one week, over the PMd region of dominant hemisphere. Precision grasp and lift were assessed by instrumented device, recording grip (G) and load (L) forces, during three manipulation tasks (ramp-and-hold, oscillation force producing and simple lifting tasks), with each hand separately, before and after interventions. Results. We observed the improvement of task performance related to constant error (CE) in oscillation task with the dominant hand (DH) after the iTBS (p = 0.009). On the contrary, the cTBS reduced variable error (VE) for non-dominant hand (NH), p = 0.005. Considering force coordination we found that iTBS worsened variables for NH (G/L ratio, p = 0.017; cross-correlation of the G and L, p = 0.047; Gain, p = 0.047). Conclusion. These results demonstrate the ability of TBS to modulate fingertip forces during precision grasping and lifting, when applied over PMd. These findings support the role of PMd in human motor control and forces generation required to hold small objects stable in our hands.

References

Whishaw IQ, Karl JM. The contribution of the reach and the grasp to shaping brain and behaviour. Can J Exp Psychol 2014; 68(4): 223−35.

Napier JR. Studies of the hands of living primates. Proc Zool Soc (London) 1960; 134(6): 647−57.

Johansson RS, Westling G. Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 1984; 56(3): 550−64.

Jaric S, Uygur M. Assessment of hand function through the coordination of contact forces in manipulation tasks. J Hum Kinet 2013; 36: 5−15.

Danion F. The contribution of non-digital afferent signals to grip force adjustments evoked by brisk unloading of the arm or the held object. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118(1): 146−54.

Macefield VG, Johansson RS. Control of grip force during re-straint of an object held between finger and thumb: Responses of muscle and joint afferents from the digits. Exp Brain Res 1996; 108(1): 172−84.

Häger-Ross C, Johansson RS. Nondigital afferent input in reactive control of fingertip forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 1996; 110(1): 131−41.

Johansson RS, Birznieks I. First spikes in ensembles of human tactile afferents code complex spatial fingertip events. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7(2): 170−7.

Johansson RS, Flanagan J. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10(5): 345−59.

Geyer S, Matelli M, Luppino G, Zilles K. Functional neuroanatomy of the primate isocortical motor system. Anat Embryol 2000; 202(6): 443−74.

Hao Y, Zhang Q, Controzzi M, Cipriani C, Li Y, Li J, et al. Distinct neural patterns enable grasp types decoding in monkey dorsal premotor cortex. J Neural Eng 2014; 11(6): 66011.

Walsh V, Cowey A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2000; 1(1): 73−9.

Castiello U, Begliomini C. The cortical control of visually guided grasping. Neuroscientist 2008; 14(2): 157−70.

Rizzolatti G, Camarda R, Fogassi L, Gentilucci M, Luppino G, Matelli M. Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Exp Brain Res 1988; 71(3): 491−507.

Rizzolatti G, Luppino G. The cortical motor system. Neuron 2001; 31(6): 889−901.

Rizzolatti G, Luppino G, Matelli M. The organization of the cor-tical motor system: New concepts. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 106(4): 283−96.

Kollias SS, Alkadhi H, Jaermann T, Crelier G, Hepp-Reymond MC. Identification of multiple nonprimary motor cortical areas with simple movements. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2001; 36(2−3): 185−95.

Nirkko AC, Ozdoba C, Redmond SM, Bürki M, Schroth G, Hess CW, et al. Different ipsilateral representations for distal and proximal movements in the sensorimotor cortex: Activation and deactivation patterns. Neuroimage 2001; 13(5): 825−35.

Keel JC, Smith MJ, Wassermann EM. A safety screening ques-tionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neuro-physiol 2001; 112(4): 720.

Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9(1): 97−113.

Krishnan V, Jaric S. Hand function in multiple sclerosis: Force coordination in manipulation tasks. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119(10): 2274−81.

Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic prin-ciples and procedures for routine clinical and research applica-tion. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 126(6): 1071−107.

Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and applica-tion guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120(12): 2008−39.

Busan P, Barbera C, Semenic M, Monti F, Pizzolato G, Pelamatti G, et al. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on pa-rietal and premotor cortex during planning of reaching move-ments. PLoS ONE 2009; 4(2): e4621.

Jaric S, Knight CA, Collins JJ, Marwaha R. Evaluation of a me-thod for bimanual testing coordination of hand grip and load forces under isometric conditions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2005; 15(6): 556−63.

Freitas PB, Krishnan V, Jaric S. Force coordination in static ma-nipulation tasks: Effects of the change in direction and han-dedness. Exp Brain Res 2007; 183(4): 487−97.

Westling G, Johansson RS. Factors influencing the force control during precision grip.Exp Brain Res 1984; 53(2): 277−84.

Flanagan JR, Tresilian JR. Grip-load force coupling: A general control strategy for transporting objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1994; 20(5): 944−57.

Zatsiorsky VM, Gao F, Latash ML. Motor control goes beyond physics: differential effects of gravity and inertia on finger forces during manipulation of hand-held objects. Exp Brain Res 2005; 162(3): 300−8.

Flanagan JR, Wing AM. Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements. Exp Brain Res 1993; 95(1): 131−43.

Flanagan JR, Tresilian J, Wing AM. Coupling of grip force and load force during arm movements with grasped objects. Neu-rosci Lett 1993; 152(1−2): 53−6.

Chouinard PA, Van DW, Leonard G, Paus T. Modulating neural networks with transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the dorsal premotor and primary motor cortices. J Neurophy-siol 2003; 90(2): 1071−83.

Chouinard PA, Leonard G, Paus T. Role of the primary motor and dorsal premotor cortices in the anticipation of forces dur-ing object lifting. J Neurosci 2005; 25(9): 2277−84.

Petrides M. Deficits in non-spatial conditional associative learn-ing after periarcuate lesions in the monkey. Behav Brain Res 1985; 16(2−3): 95−101.

Halsband U, Freund HJ. Premotor cortex and conditional motor learning in man. Brain 1990; 113(Pt 1): 207–22.

Huang Y, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005; 45(2): 201−6.

Carson RG. Neural pathways mediating bilateral interactions between the upper limbs. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2005; 49(3): 641−62.

Lenzi D, Conte A, Mainero C, Frasca V, Fubelli F, Totaro P, et al. Effect of corpus callosum damage on ipsilateral motor activa-tion in patients with multiple sclerosis: A functional and ana-tomical study. Hum Brain Mapp 2007; 28(7): 636−44.

Grefkes C, Eickhoff SB, Nowak DA, Dafotakis M, Fink GR. Dy-namic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM. Neuroimage 2008; 41(4): 1382−94.

Fling BW, Benson BL, Seidler RD. Transcallosal sensorimotor fi-ber tract structure-function relationships. Hum Brain Mapp 2013; 34(2): 384−95.

Di Lazzaro V, Pilato F, Dileone M, Profice P, Oliviero A, Mazzone P, et al. The physiological basis of the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 2008; 586(Pt 16): 3871−9.

Kinsbourne M. Mechanisms of hemispheric interaction in man. In: Kinsbourne M, Smith W, editors. Hemispheric disconnection and cerebral function. Springfield, IL: Thomas; 1974. p. 260−85.

Neva JL, Singh AM, Vesia M, Staines WR. Selective modulation of left primary motor cortex excitability after continuous theta burst stimulation to right primary motor cortex and bimanual training. Behav Brain Res 2014; 269: 138−46.