Does neuromotor immaturity represents a risk for acquiring basic academic skills in school-age children?
Abstract
Abstract
Background/Aim. Studies that investigated the presence of soft neurological signs in terms of neuromotor immaturity and impact on the ability of reading, writing and calculation are rare. At school age, cognitive development in children of the typical population is monitored over, while much less was focused on motor development. This is one of the important reasons for conducting this research. The aim of this study is to determine whether neuromotor immaturity of children poses a risk for the adoption of the basic academic skills in school children. Most authors investigated the presence of dysgraphia, dyslexia and dyscalculia in clinically diagnosed conditions. Methods. The data were obtained by testing. To assess neuromotor maturity, The Developmental Screening Test was used. The quality of handwriting was evaluated according to the criteria proposed by Simner and Eidlitz. Quality of reading skills is assessed by the Three-dimensional Reading Test. Evaluation of the presence of difficulties in numeracy was performed by a series of adapted tasks, taken from the Romanian Screening Instrument for Dyscalculia. Results. The sample was divided into two groups of pupils according to the results. The groups consisted of students with and without the presence of neuromotor immaturity. There was a significantly higher prevalence of students with difficulties in reading, writing and numeracy in the group of neuromotor immature students. Conclusion. The results clearly indicated that neuromotor immaturity of children represents a risk to the adoption of the basic academic skills in children in school age. We believe that the school age is very important time to monitor motor development of a child to the same extent as the cognitive development. In this way, we would have the opportunity to intervene on time and reduce a possibility of school failure. Wider studies in this area are urgently needed.
References
REFERENCES
Goddard BS. Assessing Neuromotor Readiness for Learning. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
Simner L. The use of handwriting legibility scales in grade 1 to identify children at risk of early school failure. In: Simner L, Leedharn G, Thornassen M, editors. Handwriting and drawing research: Basic and applied issues. Burke: IOS Press; 1996.
Eidlitz M. The nature of dysgraphic handwriting in grade-1 children [dissertation]. London: University of Western Ontario - Faculty of Graduate Studies; 1999.
Hermabessière G, Sax H. Proof reading "Jeannot et Georges". Paris: ECPA; 1972. (French)
Gliga F, Gliga T. Romanian screening instrument for dyscalcu-lia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2012; 33: 15–9.
Ilić-Stošović D. The theory of education of persons with physical disabilities. Belgrade: Faculty of Special Education and Reha-bilitation, University of Belgrade; 2011. (Serbian)
Ilić-Stošović D, Nikolić S, Ilić S, Drčelić M. Identification of the needs of teachers to support the implementation of inclusive education. Belgrade School of Special Education and Rehabilitation; 2012; 2: 359–68. (Serbian)
Goddard BS. Neurological dysfunction as a significant factor in children diagnosed with dyslexia. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 5th British Dyslexia Association (BDA) Inter-national Conference. York: Institute for Neuro-Physiological Psychology, Univesity of York; 2001.
Blythe SG. Releasing Educational Potential Through Move-ment: A Summary of Individual Studies Carried Out Using the INPP Test Battery and Developmental Exercise Programme for use in Schools with Children with Special Needs. Child Care Practice 2005; 11(4): 415–32.
McPhillips M, Hepper P, Mulhern G. Effects of replicating primary-reflex movements on specific reading difficulties in children: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355(9203): 537–41.
McPhillips M, Jordan-Black J. The effect of social disadvantage on motor development in young children: a comparative study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007; 48(12): 1214–22.
McPhillips M, Sheehy N. Prevalence of persistent primary reflexes and motor problems in children with reading difficulties. Dyslexia 2004; 10(4): 316–38.
Taylor M, Houghton S, Chapmanm E. Primitive reflexes and at-tention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: developmental origins of classroom dysfunction. Int J Spec Educ 2004; 19(1): 23-37.
Wittrock MC. Students' thought processes. In: Wittrock MC, editor. Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Mac-Millan; 1986. p. 297–314.
Thomas M, Jankovic J, Suteerawattananon M, Wankadia S, Caroline KS, Vuong KD, et al. Clinical gait and balance scale (GABS): validation and utilization. J Neurol Sci 2004; 217(1): 89–99.
Deuel K, Rauchway C. The neurological examination of the school-age and adolescent child. In: David B, editor. Child and adolescent neurology. 2nd ed. Richmond: Blackwell; 2005, pp. 57.
Ayres J. Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los An-geles: Western Psychological Services; 1983.
Hoff H, Schilder P. Clinical studies on postural and righting ref-lexes and related phenomena. Vienna, Austria: Julius Springer Nature; 1927. (German)
Valett RE. Dyslexia: a neuropsychological approach to educat-ing children with severe reading disorders. Belmont, Calif: Fearon Pitman Publishers; 1980.
Tansley AE. Reading and remedial reading. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1967.
Bender L. A visual-motor Gestalt test and its clinical use. New York: American Orthopsychiatric Association; 1938.
Overvelde A, Hulstijn W. Handwriting development in grade 2 and grade 3 primary school children with normal, at risk, or dysgraphic characteristics. Res Dev Disabil 2011; 32(2): 540–8.
Morovic ML, Matijevic V, Divljakovic K, Kraljevic M, Dimic Z. Drawing Skills in Children with Neurodevelopmental Delay Aged 2-5 Years. Acta Clin Croatica 2015; 54(2): 119–26.
Beery KE. Developmental test of visual motor integration: Ad-ministration, scoring, and teaching manual. 3rd ed. Cleveland, OH: Modern Curriculum Press; 1989.
Van Hoorn JF, Maathuis CG, Peters LH, Hadders-Algra M. Handwriting, visuomotor integration, and neurological condi-tion at school age. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010; 52(10): 941–7.
DeMyer W. Technique of the neurological examination. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
Holt KS. Child Development Diagnosis and Assessment. Lon-don: Elsevier Science and Technology Books; 1991.
Blythe P, McGlown DJ. An organic basis for neuroses and educa-tional difficulties. Chester: Insight Publications; 1979.
Goddard S. The role of reflexes in the development of the visual system. J Behav Optometry 1995; 6(2): 31–5.
Bein-Wierzbinski W. Persistent primitive reflexes in elementary school children. Effect on oculo-motor and visual perception. Paper presented at The 13th European Conference of Neuro-Developmental Delay in Children with Specific Learning Dif-ficulties. Chester, UK: 2001.
Sales R, Colafêmina JF. The influence of eye movement and vestibuloocular reflex on reading and writing. Rev CEFAC 2014; 16(6): 1791–7.
Maeland AF. Handwriting and Perceptual-Motor Skills in Clumsy, Dysgraphic, and ‘Normal’ Children. Percept Mot Skills 1992; 75(3Pt2): 1207–17.
Stoodley CJ, Stein JF. Cerebellar Function in Developmental Dyslexia. Cerebellum 2013; 12(2): 267–76.
Shapiro J. Research perspectives on whole-language. In: Froese V, editor. Whole language: Practice and theory. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1990. p. 313–56.
Frank J, Levinson H. Dysmetric dyslexia and dyspraxia: Hypo-thesis and study. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1973; 12(4): 690–701.
Levinson HN. Total concentration. New York: Evans; 1990.
Loras H, Sigmundsson H, Stensdotter A, Talcott JB. Postural Con-trol Is Not Systematically Related to Reading Skills: Implica-tions for the Assessment of Balance as a Risk Factor for Deve-lopmental Dyslexia. PLoS ONE 2014; 9(6): e98224.
Shalev RS, Auerbach J, Manor O, Gross-Tsur V. Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and prognosis. Eur Child Adolesc Psy-chiatry. 2000; 9 Suppl 2: II58–64.
Kosc L. Psychology and psychopathology of mathematical abilities. Studia Psychologica 1970; 12: 159–62.
Risey J, Briner W. Dyscalculia in patients with vertigo. J Vestib Res 1990-1991; 1(1): 31–7.