Neurocutaneous flaps for soft tissue reconstruction of the knee, lower leg, ankle and foot: clinical experience with 32 patients
Abstract
Background/Aim. Neurocutaneous flaps (NF) are the type of fasciocutaneous flaps whose clinical application has increasingly grown over the years. They have become an indispensable step in the reconstructive ladder for the small and medium soft tissue defects of the lower leg and foot. The aim of this study was to analyse the results of the treatment of patients with lower extremity soft tissue defects caused by trauma, infection, tumour removal or unstable scar formation, which were reconstructed with a variety of NF. Methods. This retrospective study includes 32 consecutive patients with soft tissue defects of the lower limb, treated in the Clinical Centre of Vojvodina from January 2004 to April 2017. All the operations were performed in regional anaesthesia with pneumatic tourniquet. Design of the flap and length of the pedicle were determined by the size and position of the recipient site after necessary debridement. The flap was harvested, rotated and positioned in the defect region. The patients and flap data were summarized upon their collection. Results. The average age of the patients, mostly males (81.2%), was 46.7 years. Distally based sural flaps were used in a majority of patients (56.2%), followed by the distally based saphenous (21.9%), lateral sural (12.5%) and proximally based sural flaps (9.4%). Defects were most often localized on the distal third of the lower leg and on the ankle (53.1%). The most common indication for surgery were trauma (46.9%) and chronic infection (31.2%). A satisfactory coverage of the defect was achieved in all 32 patients with no flap loss. A partial necrosis of the flap due to prolonged venous congestion was noted in 3 (9.4%) patients, which were healed by second intention or with delayed skin grafting. Five (15.6%) patients developed a localised infection. The infection signs withdrew spontaneously in 2 cases and after a surgical revision in 3 cases, where osteitis of the tibia had persisted. One of them required the Ilizarov orthopaedic procedure after bone resection. Conclusion. NF proved to be a paramount alternative to free-flap reconstruction of the lower limb. Intensive clinical application can be explained by the fact that it is a less technically demanding and time consuming surgical procedure with no major source vessel sacrifice. The reliability and safety of their utilisation are confirmed by our clinical data.
References
Pontén B. The fasciocutaneous flap: Its use in soft tissue defects of the lower leg. Br J Plast Surg 1981; 34(2): 215–20.
Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. A classification of fascio-cutaneous flaps according to their patterns of vascularisation. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 37(1): 80–7.
Masquelet AC, Romana MC, Wolf G. Skin island flaps supplied by the vascular axis of the sensitive superficial nerves: ana-tomic study and clinical experience in the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89(6): 1115–21.
Hasegawa M, Torii S, Katoh H, Esaki S. The distally based su-perficial sural artery flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93(5): 1012–20.
Kojić S. Significance of neurocutaneous flaps in reconstruction of foot and lower leg defects [dissertation]. Belgrade: Universi-ty of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine; 2005. (Serbian)
Nakajima H, Imanishi N, Fukuzumi S, Minabe T, Aiso S, Fujino T. Accompanying arteries of the cutaneous veins and cutane-ous nerves in the extremities: Anatomical study and a concept of the venoadipofascial and/or neuroadipofascial pedicled fasciocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102(3): 779–91.
Deng C, Wei ZZ, Wang B, Jin W, Zhang W, Tang X, et al. The proximally based lateral superficial sural artery flap: a conven-ient and optimal technique for the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects around the knee. Int J Clin Exp Med 2016; 9(8): 15167–76.
Pan H, Zheng Q, Yang S. Utility of proximally based sural fasciocutaneous flap for knee and proximal lower leg defects. Wounds 2014; 26(5): 132–8.
Ilyas Tahirkheli MU, Ellahi I, Dar MF, Sharif A. Distal Based Sural Fascio-Cutaneous Flap: A Practical Limb Saviour for Wounds of War and Peace. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2016; 26(5): 399–402.
Ciofu RN, Zamfirescu DG, Popescu SA, Lascar I. Reverse sural flap for ankle and heel soft tissues reconstruction. J Med Life 2017; 10(1): 94–8.
Cavadas PC. Reversed saphenous neurocutaneous island flap: Clinical experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99(7): 1940–6.
Zhong W, Lu S, Chai Y. Distally based saphenous neurocuta-neous perforator flap: A versatile donor site for reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the medial malleolar region. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016; 55: 391–6.
Zhu Y, Wang Y, He X, Zhu M, Li F, Xu Y. Foot and ankle re-construction: An experience on the use of 14 different flaps in 226 cases. Microsurgery 2013; 33(8): 600–4.
de Blacam C, Colakoglu S, Ogunleye AA, Nguyen JT, Ibrahim AM, Lin SJ, et al. Risk factors associated with complications in lower-extremity reconstruction with the distally based sural flap: A systematic review and pooled analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67(5): 607–16.
Herlin C, Sinna R, Hamoui M, Canovas F, Captier G, Chaput B. Distal lower extremity coverage by distally based sural flaps: Methods to increase their vascular reliability. Ann Chirur Plas-tique Esthetique 2017; 62(1): 45–54.
Erdmann D, Gottlieb N, Humphrey SJ, Le TC, Bruno W, Levin SL. Sural flap delay procedure: A preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54(5): 562–5.
Loonen MP, Kon M, Schuurman AH, Bleys RL. Venous bypass drainage of the small saphenous vein in the neurovascular ped-icle of the sural flap: Anatomical study and clinical implica-tions. Plast Reconstruct Surg 2007; 120(7): 1898–905.
Wong C, Tan B. Maximizing the reliability and safety of the distally based sural artery flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2008; 24(8): 589–94.
Fujiwara M, Nagata T, Matsushita Y, Ishikawa K, Yusuke O, Fu-kamizu H. Delayed distally based sural flap with temporary venous supercharging. Microsurgery 2013; 33(7): 534–8.
Eker G, Akan I, Aydoğdu E, Aköz T. Salvage of neurocutane-ous flaps with venous congestion using intravenous cannula. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112(4): 1191–2.
Schmitt SK. Osteomyelitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2017; 31(2): 325–38.
Wei J, Dong Z, Ni J, Liu L, Luo S, Luo Z, et al. Influence of flap factors on partial necrosis of reverse sural artery flap: A study of 179 consecutive flaps. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 72(3): 744–50.
Tsai J, Liao HT, Wang PF, Chen CT, Lin CH. Increasing the success of reverse sural flap from proximal part of posterior calf for traumatic foot and ankle reconstruction: Patient selec-tion and surgical refinement. Microsurgery 2013; 33(5): 342–9.
Liu L, Zou L, Li Z, Zhang Q, Cao X, Cai J. The extended dis-tally based sural neurocutaneous flap for foot and ankle recon-struction: a retrospective review of 10 years of experience. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72(6): 689–94.
Dhamangaonkar AC, Patankar HS. Reverse sural fasciocutane-ous flap with a cutaneous pedicle to cover distal lower limb soft tissue defects: Experience of 109 clinical cases. J Ortho-paed Traumatol 2014; 15(3): 225–9.
Uygur F, Evinç R, Noyan N, Duman H. Should we hesitate to use subcutaneous tunneling for fear of damaging the sural flap pedicle. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63(1): 89–93.
Parrett BM, Pribaz JJ, Matros E, Przylecki W, Sampson CE, Orgill DP. Risk Analysis for the Reverse Sural Fasciocutaneous Flap in Distal Leg Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123(5): 1499–504.
Yildirim S, Akan M, Aköz T. Soft-tissue reconstruction of the foot with distally based neurocutaneous flaps in diabetic pa-tients. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 48(3): 258–64.
Nuri T, Ueda K, Maeda S, Otsuki Y. Anatomical study of medi-al and lateral sural cutaneous nerve: Implications for innervat-ed distally-based superficial sural artery flap. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2012; 46(1): 8–12.
Santanelli F, Tenna S, Pace A, Scuderi N. Free flap reconstruc-tion of the sole of the foot with or without sensory nerve co-aptation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109(7): 2314–22.
Orbay H, Ogawa R, Ono S, Aoki S, Hyakusoku H. Distally based superficial sural artery flap excluding the sural nerve. Plast Reconstruct Surg 2011; 127: 1749–50.
Chen S, Chen T, Wang H. The distally based sural fascio muscu-locutaneous flap for foot reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aes-thet Surg 2006; 59(8): 846–55.
Fodor L, Horesh Z, Lerner A, Ramon Y, Peled IJ, Ullmann Y. The Distally Based Sural Musculoneurocutaneous Flap for Treat-ment of Distal Tibial Osteomyelitis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119(7): 2127–36.
Chen X, Xu Y, Chen J, Ma Z, Guan L, Xu J, et al. Dominant perforator neurocutaneous flaps for one-staged reconstruction of defects caused by high energy at lower legs, ankles and feet. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2013; 29(2): 81–7. (Chinese)
Terzić Z, Djordjević B. Clinical aspects of reconstruction of the lower third of the leg with fasciocutaneous flap based on pe-roneal artery perforators. Vojnosanit Pregl 2014; 71(1): 39–45.
Toia F, Arpa SD, Pignatti M, Noel W, Cordova A. Axial propel-ler flaps: A proposal for update of the "Tokyo consensus on propeller flaps". J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70(6): 857–60.
Ozalp B, Aydınol M. Perforator-based propeller flaps for leg re-construction in pediatric patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69(10): e205–11.
Chaput B, Herlin C, Espié A, Meresse T, Grolleau JL, Garrido I. The keystone flap alternative in posttraumatic lower-extremity reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67(1): 130–2.