Autopolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate) reinforced with aluminum trioxide nanoparticles
Abstract
Background/Aim. Mechanical properties, most significantly flexural strength of cold polymerized acrylic dental materials, used for denture reparation are lower compared to the equivalent hot polymerized materials. This paradox can be rectified by the application of alumina nanoparticles, which was the aim of this work. Methods. The liquid component of the commercial autopolymerized denture reline resin was modified with 0.05%, 0.2% and 1.5% (wt) 13 nm hydrophobic Al2O3. These mixtures, along with the unmodified liquid, were mixed with the powder component to form test specimens. Flexural modulus and strength were tested, while the results were statistically evaluated by the one-way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey’s test. Differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis were performed to assess the heat and fracture surface features. Results. A statistically significant increase in flexural modulus was obtained only for 0.2% nanoparticle content, while flexural strength was significantly increased for specimens modified with 0.05% and 0.2% nanoparticles. Moreover, the rise of nanoparticle content to 1.5% contributed the formation of agglomerates, giving unsatisfactory mechanical properties. Also, the rise in glass transition temperature was noted for the most effective 0.05 and 0.2% Al2O3 contents. Conclusion. The 0.2% 13 nm Al2O3 loading is the most effective in improving the tested mechanical properties of cold polimerized poly(methyl methacrylate) reline resin.
References
Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: A mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years, 1972. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89(5): 427‒35.
Stamenković D, Obradović-Đuričić K, Beloica D, Leković V, Ivanović V, Pavlović G, et al. Dental materials. Belgrade: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva; 2003. (Serbian)
Jerolimov V. The basics of dental materials. Zagreb: School of Dental Medicine University of Zagreb: 2005. (Croatian)
Balos S, Pilic B, Markovic D, Pavlicevic J, Luzanin O. Poly(methyl-methacrylate) nanocomposites with low silica ad-dition. J Prosthet Den 2014; 111(4): 327–34.
Vojdani M, Khaledi AAR. Transverse Strength of Reinforced Denture Base Resin with Metal Wire and E-Glass Fibers. Front Dent 2006; 3(4): 159‒66.
Carlos NB, Harrison A. The effect of untreated UHMWPE beads on some properties of acrylic resin denture base materi-al. J Dent 1997; 25(1): 59–64.
Vuorinen AM, Dyer SR, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Effect of rig-id rod polymer filler on mechanical properties of poly methyl methacrylate denture base material. Dent Mater 2008; 24(5): 708–13.
Ayad NM, Badawi MF, Fatah AA. Effect of reinforcement of high-impact acrylic resin with zirconia on some physical and mechanical properties. Arch Oral Res 2008; 4(3): 145–51.
Ellakwa AE, Morsy MA, El-Sheikh AM. Effect of aluminum oxide addition on the flexural strength and thermal diffusivity of heat-polymerized acrylic resin. J Prosthodont 2008; 17(6): 439–44.
Fortulan CA, de Souza DPF. Microstructural evolution of the Al2O3–ZrO2 composite and its correlation with electrical con-ductivity. Mater Res 1999; 2(3): 205–10.
Marti A. Inert bioceramics (Al2O3, ZrO2) for medical applica-tion. Injury Int J Care Injured 2000; 31(Suppl 4): 33–6.
Santos C, Souza RC, Daguano JKMF, Elias CN, Rogero SO. De-velopment of Al2O3–ZrO2 bioceramic composites. Salvador, Brazil: 51 Congresso Brasileiro de Ceramica; 2007, June 3‒6.
Balos S, Pilic B, Petrovic Dj, Petronijevic B, Sarcev I. Flexural strength and modulus of autopolimerized poly(methyl methac-rylate) with nanosilica. Vojnosanit Pregl 2018; 75(6): 564–69.
Lee SY, Lai, YL, Hsu, TS. Influence of polymerization condi-tions on monomer elution and microhardness of autopolymer-ized polymethyl methacrylate resin. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110(2): 179‒83.
Fletcher AM, Purnaveja S, Amin WM, Ritchie GM, Moradians S, Dodd AW. The Level of Residual Monomer in Self curing den-ture Base Materials. J Dent Res 1983; 62(2): 118‒20.
Lamb DJ, Ellis B, Priestley D. The effects of process variables on levels of residual monomer in autopolymerizing dental acrylic resin. J Dent 1983; 11(1): 80–8.
Balos S, Balos T, Sidjanin L, Markovic D, Pilic B, Pavlicevic J. Study of PMMA biopolymer properties treated with micro-wave energy. Mater Plast 2011; 48(2): 127‒31.
Balos S, Balos T, Sidjanin L, Markovic D, Pilic B, Pavlicevic J. Flexural and impact strength of microwave treated autopo-limerized Poly(Methyl-methacrylate). Mater Plast 2009; 46(3): 261-65.
Fragiadakis D, Pissis P, Bokobza L. Glass transition and molec-ular dynamics in poly (dimethylsiloxane)/silica nanocompo-sites. Polymer 2005; 46(16): 6001‒8.
Bera O, Pavlicevic J, Jovicic M, Stoiljkovic D, Pilic B, Radicevic R. The Influence of nanosilica on styrene free radical polymeriza-tion kinetics. Polym Composite 2011; 33(2): 262‒66.
Elshereksi NW, Mohamed SH, Arifin A, Mohd Ishak ZA. Effect of filler incorporation on the fracture toughness properties of denture base poly(methyl methacrylate). J Phys Sci 2009; 20(2): 1–12.