Do women in rural areas of Serbia rarely apply preventive measures against cervical cancer?

  • Ljiljana Antić High Medical School of Professional Studies in Ćuprija, Ćuprija, Serbia
  • Bosiljka Djikanović Institute for Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dejana Vuković Institute for Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia
  • Vladimir Kaludjerović General Hospital in Ćuprija, Ćuprija, Serbia
Keywords: uterine cervical neoplasms, rural health, urban health, vaginal smears, socioeconomic factors, women, serbia,

Abstract


Background/Aim. The incidence of cervical cancer in Central Serbia has the higher rate as compared with that in other European countries. Considering mortality rate for cervical cancer, the standardized rate in Serbia is 10.1 per 10,000 females, which is the second highest one after that in Romania with 13.0. The aim of this study was to examine application of preventive measures for cervical cancer in women both from rural and urban areas in Serbia and if they are associated with sociodemographic characteristics and sexual behaviour. Methods. We analyzed secondary data of the 2006 National Health Survey of the population of Serbia focused on characteristics of adult females aged 25 to 65 years (5.314 in total) taking into consideration that programme of the organized screening will include female population aged over 25 years. Results. Respondents from rural areas have gynecological examination less than once a year in comparison with those from urban areas (OR = 0.60, 95% Cl 0.54–0.68). Less women from rural areas did Pap test during the last 12 months in comparison with respondents from urban areas (OR = 0.55, 95% Cl 0.48–0.64). Respondents from urban areas less often do the Pap test on doctor's advice in comparison with those from rural one (OR = 0.55, 95% Cl 0.42–0.62). Conclusion. This study shows that women in rural areas rarely implement preventive gynecological measures againt cervical cancer in comparison with those in urban areas. Implementation of preventive measures among rural women is conditioned by lower levels of education and lower socioeconomic status.

References

Kesić V, Jovićević-Bekić A, Vujnović M. Cervical cancer screening in Serbia. Coll Antropol 2007; 31(Suppl 2): 31−6.

Arbyn M, Primic-Zakelj M, Raifu AO, Grce M, Paraskevaidis E, Diakomanolis E, et al. The burden of cervical cancer in South-East Europe at the beginning of the 21st century. Coll Antro-pol 2007; 31(Suppl 2): 7−10.

Smith JS, Green J, Berrington GA, Appleby P, Peto J, Plummer M, et al. Cervical cancer and use of hormonal contraceptives: a sys-tematic review. Lancet 2003; 361(9364): 1159−67.

Mitrović-Jovanović A, Stanimirović B, Nikolić B, Zamurović M, Perišić Ž, Pantić-Aksentijević S. Intraepithelial neoplasms of the ervix, vagina and vulva. Vojnosanit Pregl 2011; 68(12): 1051−6. (Serbian)

Franceschi S, Plummer M, Clifford G, Sanjose S, Bosch X, Herrero R, et al. Differences in the risk of cervical cancer and human pa-pillomavirus infection by education level. Br J Cancer 2009;101(5): 865−70.

McIntyre-Seltman K, Castle PE, Guido R, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM. Smoking is a risk factor for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 among oncogenic human papillomavirus DNA-positive women with equivocal or mildly abnormal cytology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14(5):1165−70.

Cothran MM, White JP. Adolescent behavior and sexually transmitted diseases: the dilemma of human papillomavirus. Health Care Women Int 2002; 23(3): 306−19.

Louie KS, de Sanjose S, Diaz M, Castellsague X, Herrero R, Meijer CJ, et al. Early age at first sexual intercourse and early pregnancy are risk factors for cervical cancer in developing countries. Br J Cancer 2009; 100(7): 1191−7.

Jensen KE, Hannibal CG, Nielsen A, Jensen A, Nøhr B, Munk C, et al. . Social inequality and incidence of and survival from cancer of the female genital organs in a population-based study in Denmark. Eur J Cancer 2008; 44(14): 2003−17.

Massad LS, Evans CT, Weber KM, Goderre JL, Hessol NA, Henry D, et al. . Changes in knowledge of cervical cancer prevention and human papillomavirus among women with human immu-nodeficiency virus. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116(4): 941−7.

Sabates R, Feinstein L. The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: the case of cervical screening in Brit-ain. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62(12): 2998−3010.

Uysal A, Birsel A. Knowledge about cervical cancer risk factors and pap testing behaviour among Turkish women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2009; 10(3): 345−50.

Hoque M, Hoque E, Kader SB. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa. East Afr J Public Health 2008; 5(2): 111−6.

Sherris J, Herdman C, Elias C. Cervical cancer in the developing world. West J Med 2001; 175(4): 231−3.

Markovic M, Kesic V, Topic L, Matejic B. Barriers to cervical can-cer screening: A qualitative study with women in Serbia. Soc Sci Med 2005; 61(12): 2528−35.

Ministry of Health Republic of Serbia. National Health Survey for the population of Republic of Serbia, (without data on Kosovo and Metohia). Basic results. Belgrade: Ministry of Health Republic of Serbia; 2006. (Serbian)

Antic LJ, Djikanovic B, Vukovic D, Matejic B. Factors associated with preventive practices for cervical cancer in women in Ser-bia: Data from the National Population Health Survey in Ser-bia 2006. Health Med 2012; 6(4): 1265−78.

Matejić B, Kesić V, Marković M, Topić L. Communications about cervical cancer between women and gynecologists in Serbia. Int J Public Health 2008; 53(5): 245−51.

Ministry of Health Serbia. Project "Support to the implementation of the National Program", "Serbia against cancer" 2010. Available from: http://www.screeningserbia.rs/sites/default/files/.2011.pdf

Spaczyński M, Nowak-Markwitz E, Januszek-Michalecka L, Karo-wicz-Bilińska A. Women's social conditions and their participa-tion in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Pol-and. Ginekol Pol 2009; 80(11): 833−8. (Polish)

Matejic B, Vukovic D, Pekmezovic T, Kesic V, Markovic M. Deter-minants of preventive health behavior in relation to cervical cancer screening among the female population of Belgrade. Health Educ Res 2010; 26(2): 201−11.

Stanković M, Miljković S, Grbeša G, Višnjić A. General characte-ristics of adolescent sexual behavior: National survey. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2009; 137(7−8): 409−15.

Rasevic M, Sedlecki K. The abortion issue in Serbia. Eur J Con-tracept Reprod Helth Care 2009; 14(6): 385−90.

Abdullah AS, Leung TY. Factors associated with the use of breast and cervical cancer screening services among Chinese women in Hong Kong. Public Health 2001; 115(3): 212−7.

Kovacs A, Dobrossy L, Budai A, Boncz I, Cornides A. The state of organized cervical screening program in Hungary in 2006. Orv Hetil 2007; 148(12): 535−7.

Gustafsson L, Pontén J, Zack M, Adami HO. International inci-dence rates of invasive cervical cancer after introduction of cy-tological screening. Cancer Causes Control 1997; 8(5): 755−63.

American Cancer Society. Detailed Guide: Cervical Cancer. Can Cervical Cancer Be Prevented. 2010. Available from: www.cancer.org [cited 2012 March 14].

Anttila A, Ronco G. Description of the national situation of cervical cancer screening in the member states of the Euro-pean Union. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45(15): 2685−708.

Anttila A, Karsa L, Aasmaa A, Fender M, Patnick J, Rebolj M, et al. Cervical cancer screening policies and coverage in Europe. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45(15): 2649−59.

Vivilaki V, Romanidou A, Theodorakis P, Lionis C. Are health education meetings effective in recruiting women in cervical screening programmes? An innovative and inexpensive inter-vention from the island of Crete. Rural Remote Health 2005; 5(2): 376.

Eaker S, Adami HO, Sparen P. Reasons women do not attend screening for cervical cancer: A population-based study in Sweden. Prev Med 2001; 32(6): 482-91.

Li J, Li L, Ma J, Wei L, Niyazi M, Li C, et al. Knowledge and attitudes about human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV vac-cines among women living in metropolitan and rural regions of China. Vaccine 2009; 27(8): 1210−5.

Published
2015/04/22
Section
Original Paper