Da li je moguće menjati psihopatska obeležja kod osoba zavisnih od psihoaktivnih supstanci lečenih u verskim terapijskim zajednicama – da li dužina boravka pravi razliku?

  • Vojislava V. Bugarski Ignjatovic Medicinski fakultet Univerzitet u Novom Sadu
  • Vanja V. Vajagić University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Special rehabilitation and education, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Željka D. Nikolašević Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychology, University of Novi Sad, Serbia
Ključne reči: poremećaji izazvani supstancama, lečenje verom, terapijska zajednica, psihopatologija, ličnost, antisocijalni poremećaji, ankete i upitnici

Sažetak


Apstrakt

 

Uvod/Cilj. Verske terapijske zajednice se izdvajaju kao sve češći terapijski modalitet u tretmanu osoba zavisnih od psihoaktivnih supstanci (PAS). Svojim programom one utiču na bihevioralnu, psihološku, kognitivnu i socijalnu promenu među svojim korisnicima. Cilj istraživanja bio je da se ispita da li dužina boravka u verskoj terapijskoj zajednici može da doprinese promeni obeležja koje čine četiri Harove dimenzije psihopatije – Antisocijalno ponašanje, Životni stil, Interpersonalni odnosi i Psihopatski afekat. Drugi cilj je bio da se ispita da li grupa ispitanika sa istorijatom zloupotrebe PAS, na tretmanu u verskoj terapijskoj zajednici, ima izraženija obeležja psihopatije u odnosu na grupu koja nikada nije konzumirala PAS. Metode. U istraživanju je učestvovalo 59 muških ispitanika, prosečne starosti 29 godina, svih obrazovnih profila, podeljenih u tri grupe: prva grupa ispitanika zavisnih od PAS koji su godinu dana boravili na tretmanu u verskoj terapijskoj zajednici; druga grupa ispitanika koji su završili dvogodišnji tretman u zajednici; treću grupu su činili zdravi dobrovoljci koji nikada nisu zloupotrebljavali PAS. Korišćen je Upitnik za procenu psihopatije koji meri četiri Harove dimenzije psihopatije. Rezultati. Dobijene su statistički značajne razlike između ispitivanih grupa na dimenziji Antisocijalno ponašanje. Na datoj dimenziji beleži se razlika između kontrolne grupe zdravih dobrovoljaca i obe grupe zavisnika, kako onih koji se nalaze godinu dana na tretmanu, tako i onih koji su uspešno završili dvogodišnji tretman u zajednici. Na ispitanoj dimenziji, kontrolna grupa zdravih osoba ostvarila je prosečno najniže skorove, dok se ni na jednoj od ispitanih dimenzija nije zabeležila statistički značajna razlika između dve grupe koje su boravile na tretmanu. Zaključak. Dvogodišnji boravak u verskoj terapijskoj zajednici nije doprineo promeni obeležja psihopatije u odnosu na jednogodišnji boravak u istoj. Ispitanici koji imaju istorijat zloupotrebe PAS i koji se leče u verskoj terapijskoj zajednici imaju izraženija psihopatska obeležja u odnosu na kontrolnu grupu ispitanika koji nisu nikad zloupotrebljavali psihoaktivne supstance.

Reference

REFERENCES

Johnson BR, Tompkins RB, Webb D. Objective hope: Assessing the effectiveness of faith-based organizations: A review of the literature. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Research on Religion and Urban Civil Society; 2002.

Fadzli A, Sudirman AF, Sudirman AF. Spiritual and Traditional Rehabilitation Modality of Drug Addiction in Malaysia. Int J Hum Soc Sci 2011; 1(14): 175–81.

Davis MT. Religious and non-religious components in sub-stance abuse treatment: A comparative analysis of faith-based and secular interventions. J Soc Work 2014; 14(3): 243–59.

Neff JA, Shorkey CT, Windsor LC. Contrasting faith-based and traditional substance abuse treatment programs. J Subst Abuse Treat 2006; 30(1): 49–61.

Hester RD. Spirituality and faith-based organizations: Their role in substance abuse treatment. Adm Policy Ment Health 2002; 30(2): 173–8.

John E. Fetzer Institute. Multidimensional measurement of re-ligiousness/spirituality for use in health research: A report of the Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group. Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute; 2003.

Powell LH, Shahabi L, Thoresen CE. Religion and spirituality. Linkages to physical health. Am Psychol 2003; 58(1): 36–52.

Flynn PM, Joe GW, Broome KM, Simpson DD, Brown BS. Looking back on cocaine dependence: Reasons for recovery. Am J Addict 2003; 12(5): 398–411.

Mason SJ, Deane FP, Kelly PJ, Crowe TP. Do spirituality and religiosity help in the management of cravings in substance abuse treatment. Subst Use Misuse 2009; 44(13): 1926–40.

Gorsuch RL. Religious aspects of substance abuse and re-covery. J Soc Issues 1995; 51(2): 65–83.

Miller WR. Spiritual aspects of addictions treatment and re-search. Mind Body Med 1997; 2(1): 37–43.

Vanderplasschen W, Colpaert K, Autrique M, Rapp R, Pearce S, Broekaert E, et al. Therapeutic Communities for Addictions: A Review of Their Effectiveness from a Recovery-Oriented Perspective. Sci World J 2013; 2013: 427817.

Vanderplasschen W, Vandevelde S, Broekaert E. Therapeutic communities for treating addictions in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2014.

De Leon G. Community as method. Therapeutic communities for special populations and special settings. Vestport, Konek-tikat: Greenwood Publishing Group; 1997.

Broekaert E. Therapeutic communities for drug users: Descrip-tion and overview. In: Rawlings B, Yates R, editors. Therapeutic communities for the treatment of drug users. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2001. p. 29–42.

De Leon G. The therapeutic community: Theory, model and method. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2000.

Hare RD, Neumann CS. Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2008; 4: 217–46.

Jainhill NG, DeLeon G, Pinkham L. Psychiatric diagnoses among substance abusers in the therapeutic community. J Psy-choactive Drugs 1986; 18(3): 209–13.

Sacks JG, Levy NM. Objective personality changes in residents of a therapeutic community. Am J Psychiatry 1979; 136(6): 796–9.

Samuel DB, LaPaglia DM, Maccarelli LM, Moore BA, Ball SA. Personality disorders and retention in a therapeutic community for substance dependence. Am J Addict 2011; 20(6): 555–62.

Ansell EB, Grilo CM. Personality disorders. In: Hersen M, Turner SM, Beidel DC, editors. Adult Psychopathology and Diagnosis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2007. p. 633–78.

Hare RD. Psychopathy a clinical construct whose time has come. Crim Justice Behav 1996; 23(1): 25–54.

Hobson J, Shine J, Roberts R. How do psychopaths behave in a prison therapeutic community? Psychol Crime Law 2000; 6(2): 139–54.

Richards HJ, Casey JO, Lucente SW. Psychopathy and treatment response in incarcerated female substance abusers. Crim Jus-tice Behav 2003; 30(2): 251–76.

Hare RD. Psychopathy: theory and research. Oxford, England: John Wiley; 1970.

Novović Z, Smederevac S, Biro M. Evaluation of psychopathic deviation (PAQ - questionnaire). In: Biro M, Smederevac S, Novović Z, editors. Evaluation of psychological and psychopa-thological phenomena. Belgrade: Center for marriage and family; 2009. p. 73–88.(Serbian)

Rueve ME, Welton RS. Violence and mental illness. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 2008; 5(5): 34–48.

Cleckley H. The mask of sanity. St. Louis, IL: Mosby; 1976.

Hare RD. Without conscious: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us. New York: Pocket books; 1993.

Ogloff JR, Wong S, Greenwood A. Treating criminal psychopaths in a therapeutic community program. Behav Sci Law 1990; 8(2): 181–90.

Hart SD, Hare RD. Psychopathy and antisocial personality dis-order. Curr Opin Psychiatry 1996; 9(2): 129–32.

Harris GT, Rice ME. Treatment of psychopathy: A review of empirical findings. In: Patrick CJ, editor. Handbook of psycho-pathy. New York: Guilford Press; 2006. p. 555–72.

Weisz J, Kazdin A. Evidence-based psychotherapies for child-ren and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press; 2010.

Salekin RT. Psychopathy and therapeutic pessimism. Clinical lore or clinical reality? Clin Psychol Rev 2002; 22(1): 79–112.

Salekin RT, Worley C, Grimes RD. Treatment of psychopathy: a review and brief introduction to the mental model approach for psychopathy. Behav Sci Law 2010; 28(2): 235–66.

Objavljeno
2021/04/21
Rubrika
Originalni članak