Montgomeri–Ašbergova skala za procenu depresivnosti u kliničkoj praksi: psihometrijska svojstva na bolesnicima u Srbiji

  • Petar Vojvodić Klinika za psihijatrijske bolesti "Dr Laza Lazarević"
  • Ana Andonov Faculty of Media and Communications, Department of Clinical Psychology
  • Dejan Stevanović Clinic for Neurology and Psychiatry for Children and Youth
  • Ivana Peruničić Mladenović Institute for Mental Health
  • Goran Mihajlović Clinic of Psychiatry, Kragujevac
  • Jovana Vojvodić Clinic for Psychiatric Disorders “Dr Laza Lazarević”
Ključne reči: depresija;, osetiljvost i specifičnost;, bolest, indeks težine;, ankete i upitnici

Sažetak


Uvod/Cilj. Razne skale za procenu depresije su dostupne, ali je Montgomeri-Ašbergova skala za procenu depresivnosti (MADRS) jedna od najviše korišćenih. Cilj istraživanja bio je da se analiziraju merne karakteristike srpske verzije MADRS za procenu ozbiljnosti depresije u kliničkim uslovima. Metode. Sprovedena su dva istraživanja kako bi se validirala MADRS. Prva studija obuhvatila je 64 odraslih bolesnika sa velikim depresivnim poremećajem (MDD), sa test-retest situacijom, a druga je obuhvatila 19 učesnika (takođe sa MDD), koji su imali šest test-retest situacija. Psihometrijska procena se bazirala na deskriptivnoj analizi, unutrašnjoj konzistenciji i test-retest pouzdanosti, kao i konkurentnoj validnosti (korelacije sa Hamiltonovom skalom za procenu depresivnosti 17 – HAMD-17). Rezultati. Interna konzistentnost za test-retest pouzdanost iznosila je 0,93 za ceo MADRS instrument, dok je za šest test-retest situacija iznosila 0,95. MADRS je pokazala jednofaktorsku strukturu, koja objašnjava 66,26% varijanse za prvo testiranje, odnosno 61,29% za retest. Utvrđena je statistički značajna korelacija između MADRS i HAMD-17 (r = 0,96 za test i r = 0,94 za retest). Takođe, utvrđena je značajna korelacija između svih stavki na MADRS pojedinačno, ali i za ceo instrument (r = 0,89). Zaključak. Skala MADRS pokazala je dobre statističke rezultate i mogla bi se koristiti u svakodnevnoj kliničkoj praksi za diskriminaciju MDD.

Reference

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (DSM–5). 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2013.

Lam RW, Michalaak EE, Swinson RP. Assessment scales in de-pression, mania and anxiety. Assessment scales in depression, mania and anxiety. London: CRC Press; 2004.

Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change, Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134: 382‒9.

Bernstein IH, Rush AJ, Stegman D, Macleod L, Witte B, Trivedi MH. A Comparison of the QIDS-C16, QIDS-SR16, and the MADRS in an Adult Outpatient Clinical Sample. CNS Spectr 2010; 15(7): 458‒68.

Carmody TJ, Rush AJ, Bernstein I, Warden D, Brannan S, Burnham D, et al. The Montgomery Asberg and the Hamilton ratings of depression: a comparison of measures. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2006; 16(8): 601‒11.

Davidson J, Turnbull CD, Strickland R, Miller R, Graves K. The Montgomery‐Åsberg Depression Scale: reliability and validity. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1986; 73(5): 544‒8.

Uher R, Farmer A, Maier W, Rietschel M, Hauser J, Marusic A, et al. Measuring depression: comparison and integration of three scales in the GENDEP study. Psychol Med 2008; 38(2): 289‒300.

Bech P, Allerup P, Larsen ER, Csillag C, Licht RW. The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale (MADRS). A psychometric re-analysis of the European genome-based therapeutic drugs for depression study using Rasch analysis. Psychiatry Res 2014; 217(3): 226‒32.

Suzuki A, Aoshima T, Fukasawa T, Yoshida K, Higuchi H, Shimizu T, et al. A three-factor model of the MADRS in major depressive disorder. Depress Anxiety 2005; 21(2): 95‒7.

Soron TR. Validation of Bangla Montgomery Asberg Depres-sion Rating Scale (MADRSB). Asian J Psychiatr 2017; 28: 41‒6.

Carneiro AM, Fernandes F, Moreno RA. Hamilton depression rating scale and montgomery-asberg depression rating scale in depressed and bipolar I patients: psychometric properties in a Brazilian sample. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015; 13: 42.

Liu J, Xiang YT, Lei H, Wang Q, Wang G, Ungvari GS, et al. Guidance on the conversion of the Chinese versions of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (C-QIDS-SR) and the Montgomery-Asberg Scale (C-MADRS) in Chinese patients with major depression. J Affect Disord 2014; 152‒154: 530‒3.

Bondolfi G, Jermann F, Rouget BW, Gex-Fabry M, McQuillan A, Dupont-Willemin A, et al. Self- and clinician-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale: evaluation in clinical practice. J Affect Disord 2010; 121(3): 268‒72.

Ahn YM, Lee KY, Yi JS, Kang MH, Kim DH, Kim JL, et al. A validation study of the Korean-version of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2005; 44(4): 466–76. (Korean)

Yee A, Yassim AR, Loh HS, Ng CG, Tan KA. Psychometric evaluation of the Malay version of the Montgomery- Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-BM). BMC Psychiatry 2015; 15: 200.

Ahmadpanah M, Sheikhbabaei M, Haghighi M, Roham F, Jahangard L, Akhondi A, et al. Validity and test-retest reliability of the Persian version of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2016; 12: 603‒7.

Cano JF, Gomez Restrepo C, Rondón M. Validation of the Mont-gomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in Colom-bia. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr 2016; 45(3): 146‒55. (Spanish)

Lobo A, Chamorro L, Luque A, Dal-Ré R, Badia X, Baró E. Grupo de Validación en Español de Escalas Psicométricas (GVEEP). Validación de las versiones en español de la Mont-gomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale y la Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale para la evaluación de la depresión y de la ansie-dad. Med Clín 2002; 118(13): 493‒9.

Satthapisit S, Posayaanuwat N, Sasaluksananont C, Kaewpornsawan T, Singhakun S. The comparison of Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS thai) to diagnostic and sta-tistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) and to Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD): validity and reliability. J Med Assoc Thai 2007; 90(3): 524‒31

Cunningham JL, Wernroth L, von Knorring L, Berglund L, Ekselius L. Agreement between physicians' and patients' ratings on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. J Affect Disord 2011; 135(1‒3): 148‒53.

Santen G, Danhof M, Della Pasqua O. Sensitivity of the Mont-gomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale to response and its consequences for the assessment of efficacy. J Psychiatr Res 2009; 43(12): 1049‒56.

Müller MJ, Himmerich H, Kienzle B, Szegedi A. Differentiating moderate and severe depression using the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS). J Affect Disord 2003; 77(3): 255‒60.

Zimmerman M, Posternak MA, Chelminski I. Derivation of a definition of remission on the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale corresponding to the definition of remission on the Hamilton rating scale for depression. J Psychiatr Res 2004; 38(6): 577‒82.

Reijnders JS, Lousberg R, Leentjens AF. Assessment of depression in Parkinson's disease: the contribution of somatic symptoms to the clinimetric performance of the Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg rating scales. J Psychosom Res 2010; 68(6): 561‒5.

Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depres-sive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967; 6(4): 278‒96.

Williams JB. A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45(8): 742‒7.

World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

Streiner D, Norman G. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 4rd ed. Oxford: Ox-ford University Press; 2008.

George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Ba-con; 2003.

Benazzi F. Factor analysis of the Montgomery Asberg Depres-sion Rating Scale in 251 bipolar II and 306 unipolar depressed outpatients. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2001; 25(7): 1369‒76.

Lobo A, Chamorro L, Luque A, Dal-Ré R, Badia X, Baró E Gru-po de Validación en Español de Escalas Psicométricas (GVEEP). Validation of the Spanish versions of the Mont-gomery-Asberg depression and Hamilton anxiety rating scales. Med Clin (Barc) 2002; 118(13): 493-9. (Spanish)

Yi JS, Bae SO, Ahn YM, Park DB, Noh KS, Shin HK, et al. Va-lidity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(K-HDRS). J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2005; 44(4): 456‒65.

Schmidtke A, Fleckenstein P, Moises W, Beckmann H. Studies of the reliability and validity of the German version of the Mont-gomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)]. Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr (1985) 1988; 139(2): 51‒65. (German)

Objavljeno
2020/12/08
Rubrika
Originalni članak