Zdravstvene posledice porodičnog nasilja nad ženama u Srbiji

  • Vesna Mijatović Jovanović University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Sonja Čanković University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Dragana Milijašević Institute of Public Health of Vojvodina, Center for Analysis, Planning and Organization of Health Care, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Snežana Ukropina University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Mladen Jovanović University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Dušan Čanković University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia
Ključne reči: nasilje nad ženama, nasilje, porodično, zdravlje, faktori rizika, socijalno-ekonomski faktori, žene

Sažetak


Uvod/Cilj. Nasilje nad ženama u porodici je značajan javno-zdravstveni problem koji ostavlja ozbiljne zdrav­stvene i socijalne posledice po žene i njihove porodice. Cilj rada bio je da se analiziraju sociodemografske karakteristike žena koje su bile izložene porodičnom nasilju, kao i uticaj nasilja na zdravlje žena. Metode. Za potrebe istraživanja korišćeni su podaci Nacionalne studije istraživanja zdravlja stanovnika Srbije iz 2013. godine koja predstavlja studiju preseka na uzorku od 6 320 žena starosti 20–75 godina. Po­vezanost izloženosti nasilja sa socio-demografskim karakte­ristikama žena kao i sa zdravstvenim indikatorima i fakto­rima rizičnog ponašanja analizirana je korišćenjem modela univarijantne i multivarijantne logističke regresije. Rezul­tati. U toku poslednjih 12 meseci, 307 (4,9%) žena je bilo izloženo fi­ičkom i/ili psihičkom nasilju u porodici. Razvedene i raz­dvojene žene, siromašne žene, kao i žene sa slabom socijal­nom podrškom, češće su bile izložene nasilju. Žene koje su bile žrtve nasilja u porodici ređe su procenjivale svoje zdra­vlje kao dobro u odnosu na žene koje nisu bile žrtve nasilja u porodici [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0,47; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0,32–0,71], češće prijavljivale teške ili jako teške telesne bolove (AOR = 2,41; 95% CI = 1,74–3,33), izlo­enost stresu i pritisku (AOR = 2,62; 95% CI = 1,89–3,64) i bile depresivne (AOR = 3,24; 95% CI = 2,08–5,03). Žene žrtve nasilja u porodici češće su koristile lekove za spavanje ili za smirenje (AOR = 2,21; 95% CI = 1,67–2,93), alkohol (AOR = 1,42; 95% CI = 1,08–1,86) i češće su imale namerne prekide trudnoće (AOR = 3,11; 95% CI = 1,48–6,54) u odnosu na žene koje nisu bile žrtve nasilja u poro­dici. Zaključak. Žene žrtve nasilja pokazuju češće poremećaje u sferi fizičkog i psihičkog zdravlja u odnosu na žene koje nisu žrtve nasilja u porodici. Prevencija nasilja zahteva multisektorski pristup, u kome zdravstveni sektor ima centralnu ulogu koja podrazumeva ranu identifikaciju i prepoznavanje nasilja, adekvatnu po­oć, kao i dokumento­vanje i prijavljivanje nasilja.

Reference

World Health Organization. Global and regional estimates of vi-olence against women: prevalence and health effects of inti-mate partner violence and nonpartner sexual violence. Gene-va: World Health Organization; 2013.

Council of Europe. Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence; Istanbul, 11. V 2011. [cited 2017 Apr 19]. Available from: http:// https://rm.coe.int/168008482e

Flury M, Nyberg E, Riecher-Rössler A. Domestic violence against women: Definitions, epidemiology, risk factors and consequences. Swiss Med Wkly 2010; 140: w13099.

Ministry of Health Republic of Serbia. Special Protocol for The Protection and Treatment of Women Victims of Violence. Belgrade; 2010. [cited 2017 Apr 27]. Available from:

http://www.zdravlje.gov.rs/downloads/Zakoni/Ostalo/ProtokolMZRSZaZastituIPostupanjeSaZenamaKojeS-uIzlozeneNasilju.pdf (Serbian)

World Health Organization. Global status report on violence prevention 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

Krantz G, Garcia - Moreno C. Violence against women. J Epi-demiol Community Health 2005; 59(10): 818–21.

Azhar Z, Sohail M M, Yasin G, Mahmood B, Mushtaq SK. Ex-ploring socio-economic factors behind domestic violence against women in Sargodha district. Int J Asian Soc Sci 2012; 2(9): 1617–26.

Kishor S, Johnson K. Profiling Domestic Violence – A Multi-Country Study. Calverton, Maryland: ORC Macro; 2004.

Babović M, Ginić K, Vuković O. Mapping family violence in cen-tral Serbia. Belgrade: SeConS; 2010. (Serbian)

World Health Organization. Multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Summary report of initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.

Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C. WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Do-mestic Violence against Women Study Team. Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic vio-lence: an observational study. Lancet 2008; 371(9619): 1165–72.

Coker AL, Davis KE, Arias I, Desai S, Sanderson M, Brandt HM, et al. Physical and mental health effects of intimate part-ner violence for men and women. Am J Prev Med 2002; 23(4): 260–8.

Otašević S. Violence in intimate partner relationships and health. Belgrade: Autonomous Women Center; 2005. (Serbi-an)

Al Dosary AH. Health impact of domestic violence against Saudi women: Cross Sectional Study. Int J Health Sci (Qas-sim) 2016; 10(2): 165–73.

Trinh OT, Oh J, Choi S, To KG, Van Do D. Changes and socio-economic factors associated with attitudes towards domestic violence among Vietnamese women aged 15-49: findings from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys, 2006-2011. Glob Health Action 2016; 9(1): 29577.

The Institute of Public Health of Serbia ”Dr Milan Jovanović Batut“. Results of the National Health Survey of the Republic of Ser-bia 2013. Belgrade: Official Gazette; 2014

Rutstein SO, Johnson K. The DHS Wealth Index. DHS Compar-ative Reports No. 6. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ORC Macro; 2004.

Bøen H, Dalgard OS, Bjertness E. The importance of social sup-port in the associations between psychological distress and somatic health problems and socio-economic factors among older adults living at home: a cross sectional study. BMC Ger-iatr 2012; 12: 27.

Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord 2009; 114(1–3): 163–73.

Djikanovic B, King EJ, Bjegovic-Mikanovic V. Gender Differences in Health Symptoms Associated with the Exposure to Physical Violence in Family: Data from the 2006 National Health Sur-vey in Serbia. J Fam Viol 2013; 28: 753–61.

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Violence against Women: an EU-wide survey. Main results. Luxembourg: Pub-lications Office of the European Union; 2014.

Pallitto CC, García-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Heise L, Ellsberg M, Watts C. WHO Multi-Country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence. Intimate partner violence, abortion, and unintended pregnancy: results from the WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013; 120(1): 3–9.

Coker AL, Smith PH, Bethea L, King MR, McKeown RE. Physi-cal health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9(5): 451–7.

Nybergh L, Taft C, Enander V, Krantz G. Self-reported expo-sure to intimate partner violence among women and men in Sweden: results from a population-based survey. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 845.

Tetikcok R, Ozer E, Cakir L, Enginyurt O, İscanli MD, Cankaya S, et al. Violence towards women is a public health problem. J Forensic Leg Med 2016; 44: 150–7.

Abramsky T, Watts C, Garcia-Moreno C, Devries K, Kiss L, Ells-berg M, et al. What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 109.

Mavrikiou PM, Apostolidou M, Parlalis SK. Risk factors for the prevalence of domestic violence against women in Cyprus. Soc Sci J 2014; 51(2) :295–301.

Owusu Adjah ES, Agbemafle I. Determinants of domestic vio-lence against women in Ghana. BMC Public Health 2016; 16: 368.

Djikanovic B, Jansen HA, Otasevic S. Factors associated with in-timate partner violence against women in Serbia: a cross sec-tional study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010; 64(8): 728–35.

Ferrari G, Agnew-Davies R, Bailey J, Howard L, Howarth E, Peters TJ, et al. Domestic violence and mental health: a cross-sectional survey of women seeking help from domestic vio-lence support services. Glob Health Action 2016; 9(1): 29890.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Adverse health conditions and health risk behaviors associated with intimate partner violence-United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008; 57(5): 113–7.

Macy RJ, Ferron J, Crosby C. Partner violence and survivors' chronic health problems: informing social work practice. Soc Work 2009; 54(1): 29–43.

Carbone-López K, Kruttschnitt C,Macmillan R. Patterns of inti-mate partner violence and their associations with physical health, psychological distress, and substance use. Public Health Rep 2006; 121(4): 382–92.

Rees S, Silove D, Chey T, Ivancic L, Steel Z, Creamer M, et al. Lifetime prevalence of gender-based violence in women and the relationship with mental disorders and psychosocial func-tion. JAMA 2011; 306(5): 513–21.

Machisa MT, Christofides N, Jewkes R. Mental ill health in struc-tural pathways to women's experiences of intimate partner vi-olence. PLoS ONE 2017; 12(4): e0175240.

Reingle JM, Jennings WG, Connell NM, Businelle MS, Chartier K. On the pervasiveness of event-specific alcohol use, general substance use, and mental health problems as risk factors for intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence 2014; 29(16): 2951–70.

Devries KM, Child JC, Bacchus LJ, Mak J, Falder G, Graham K, et al. Intimate partner violence victimization and alcohol con-sumption in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 2014; 109(3): 379–91.

The Law on Prevention of Domestic Violence. Official Herald of the RS, No. 94/2016. (Serbian)

Objavljeno
2021/08/19
Rubrika
Originalni članak