Minimally Invasive Approach for the Treatment of Pancreatic Pseudcyst. Transgastric Drainage - Where We Are Now?

Nenad Perišić; Mihailo Bezmarević; Radoje Doder; Irina Brčerević; Stanko Petrović

doi:10.2298/VSP180723003P

Nenad Perišić Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Gastroenterology, Belgrade, Serbia
Mihailo Bezmarević Military Medical Academy, Clinic for General Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
Radoje Doder Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Gastroenterology, Belgrade, Serbia
Irina Brčerević Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Gastroenterology, Belgrade, Serbia
Stanko Petrović Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Gastroenterology, Belgrade, Serbia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP180723003P

Sažetak

Introduction: Minimally invasive approach for the treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP) and its complications has proven to reduce morbidity and mortality rate, length of hospitalization and costs of treatment, and improve quality of life of the patients. This approach for the AP has been implemented in developed countries, but in our region lags behind. In this case report we present the successful endoscopic transgatsric drainage of the large pancreatic pseudocyst (PPC) developed as a complication of AP.

Case Report: A 63 years old male patient was presented with nausea and vomiting as a consequence of the compressive effects of PPC in the body and tail of the pancreas after episode of AP. On computed tomography (CT) scan it was shown a cystic formation in the region of the pancreatic body and tail compressing stomach which was verified on upper endoscopy. Under fluoroscopy using lateral duodenoscope the biliary plastic prostheses of 12 French and 8 cm of length was placed throughout posterior stomach wall into PPC. The intervention was finished uneventful without complications. On CT scan performed 7 days after procedure the reduction of the PPC size was significant and control CT scan one month after the procedure and removal of the prosthesis showed almost complete resolution of the PPC.

Conclusion: Endoscopic transgastric drainage is safe and effective procedure for PPCs especially when PPC has propulsion effects on stomach wall.

Reference

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Pancreati-tis. Pancreatitis diagnosis and management: Nice guideline. [cited 2018 March]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng104/documents/draft-guideline

Banks PA. Epidemiology, natural history, and predictors of disease outcome in acute and chronic pancreatitis. Gastroin-test Endosc 2002; 56(6 Suppl): S226‒30.

Institute of Public Health of Serbia. "Dr. Milan Jovanovic Ba-tut". Hospitalization report for 2016. Belgrade: Republic In-stitute of Statistics; 2017. (Serbian)

Aghdassi AA, Mayerle J, Kraft M, Sielenkämper AW, Heidecke CD, Lerch MM. Pancreatic pseudocysts--when and how to treat? HPB (Oxford) 2006; 8(6): 432‒41.

Kim KO, Kim TN. Acute pancreatic pseudocyst: incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes. Pancreas 2012; 41(4): 577‒81.

Song TJ, Lee SS. Endoscopic drainage of pseudocysts. Clin En-dosc 2014; 47(3): 222‒6.

Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the At-lanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62(1): 102‒11.

Beyer G, Mayerle J, Lerch MM. Strategies for the Treatment of Pancreatic Pseudocysts and Walled-Off Necrosis After Acute Pancreatitis: Interventional Endoscopic Approaches. In: Beger HG, Warshaw AL, Hruban RH, Buchler MW, Lerch MM, Ne-optolemos JP, et al, editors. The Pancreas: An Integrated Text-book of Basic Science, Medicine, and Surgery. 3rd ed. Hobo-ken, New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell Publishing Limited; 2018.

Nealon WH, Walser E. Main pancreatic ductal anatomy can di-rect choice of modality for treating pancreatic pseudocysts (surgery versus percutaneous drainage). Ann Surg 2002; 235(6): 751‒8.

van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH, et al. Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for ne-crotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362(16): 1491‒502.

Teoh AY, Dhir V, Jin ZD, Kida M, Seo DW, Ho KY. Systematic review comparing endoscopic, percutaneous and surgical pan-creatic pseudocyst drainage. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(6): 310‒8.

Tyberg A, Karia K, Gabr M, Desai A, Doshi R, Gaidhane M, et al. Management of pancreatic fluid collections: A comprehen-sive review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22(7): 2256‒70.

Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Equal Efficacy of Endoscopic and Surgical Cysto-gastrostomy for Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage in a Random-ized Trial. Gastroenterology 2013; 145(3): 583‒90.e1.

Gerald BH, Cicurel NJ, Seed RW. Transgastric needle aspiration of pancreatic pseudocyst through an endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 1975; 21(3): 133‒4.

Khawaja FI, Goldman LP. Endoscopic drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst and pseudo-gastric fistulae. Gastrointest Endosc 1983; 29: 171.

Kozarek RA, Brayko CM, Harlan J, Sanowski RA, Cintora I, Ko-vac A. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastro-intest Endosc 1985; 31(5): 322‒8.

Keil R, Námešný I, Drábek J, Martínek J, Hořák J, Janík V. En-doskopická drenáž pankreatických pseudocyst. Mini-invaz.Terapie l997; 5: 34‒6. (Czech)

Howell D, Saltzman J, Robson K. Endoscopic management of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections: Techniques. 2017. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/endoscopic-management-of-walled-off-pancreatic-fluid-collections-techniques.

Antillon MR, Shah RJ, Stiegmann G, Chen YK. Single-step EUS-guided transmural drainage of simple and complicated pancre-atic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63(6): 797‒803.

Grimm H, Binmoeller KF, Soehendra N. Endosonography-guided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst. Gastroint Endosc 1992; 38(2): 170‒1.

Kahaleh M1, Shami VM, Conaway MR, Tokar J, Rockoff T, De La Rue SA, et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound Drainage of Pancre-atic Pseudocyst: A Prospective Comparison with Convention-al Endoscopic Drainage. Endoscopy 2006; 38(4): 355‒9.

Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER, Wil-cox CM. Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68(6): 1102‒11.

Park DH, Lee SS, Moon SH, Choi SY, Jung SW, Seo DW, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus conventional transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 2009; 41(10): 842‒8.

Vosoghi M, Sial S, Garrett B, Feng J, Lee T, Stabile BE, et al. EUS-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage: review and expe-rience at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center. MedGenMed 2002; 4(3): 2.

Varadarajulu S, Lopes TL, Wilcox CM, Drelichman ER, Kilgore ML, Christein JD. EUS versus surgical cyst-gastrostomy for management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68(4): 649‒55.

Nealon WH, Bhutani M, Riall TS, Raju G, Ozkan O, Neilan R. A Unifying Concept: Pancreatic Ductal Anatomy Both Pre-dicts and Determines the Major Complications Resulting from Pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208(5): 790‒9; discussion 799‒801.

Trevino JM, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S. Successful stenting in ductal disruption favorably impacts treatment outcomes in pa-tients undergoing transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25(3): 526‒31.

Fockens P, Johnson TG, van Dullemen HM, Huibregtse K, Tygat GN. Endosonographic imaging of pancreatic pseudocysts be-fore endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46(5): 412‒6.

Melman L, Azar R, Beddow K, Brunt LM, Halpin VJ, Eagon JC, et al. Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgas-trostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc 2009; 23(2): 267‒71.

Navaneethan U, Njei B, Sanaka MR. 734 Endoscopic Transmu-ral Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts: Multiple Plastic Stents Versus Metal Stents- a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79(5): AB167‒8.

Sharaiha RZ, DeFilippis EM, Kedia P, Gaidhane M, Boumitri C, Lim H, et al. Metal versus plastic for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage: clinical outcomes and success. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82(5): 822‒7.