Odnos između somatskih tegoba, crta ličnosti i pozitivnosti
Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. Nedavna istraživanja su se bavila utvrđivanjem razlika u crtama ličnosti i njihove uloge u promociji zdravlja i moderiranju osetljivosti na nesreće i bolest. Cilj ovog rada bio je da se istraži moderatorska uloga somatskih tegoba i relacija crta ličnosti operacionalizovanih putem modela Kibernetske baterije konativnih testova (KON-6) i pozitivnosti. Metode. Istraživanje je sprovedeno na uzorku od 512 studenata, prosečne starosti 23,83 godine, 56,3% ženskog pola, 23% sa somatskim tegobama. U istraživanju je korišćena Skala pozitivne orijentacije koja meri pozitivnost i KON-6 koja meri šest dinamskih crta ličnosti – Sistem regulacije aktiviteta (ε), Sistem regulacije organskih funkcija (χ), Sistem regulacije odbrambenih reakcija (α), Sistem regulacije napada (σ), Homeostatsku koordinaciju sistema (δ) i Integrativnu regulaciju sistema (η). Rezultati. Sve konativne dimenzije ličnosti značajno su i adekvatno korelirale sa pozitivnošću, izuzev σ, dok je poduzorak sa prisustvom somatskih tegoba demonstrirao više skorove crtama α i η, upućujući na viši nivo anksioznosti i socijalne usklađenosti. Na kontrole efekata pola i starosti, crte ličnosti zajedno sa prisustvom somatskih tegoba objasnile su ukupno 26% varijanse pozitivnosti, koju pozitivno predviđa viša aktivnost ε, te negativno viša aktivnost α i δ. Moderacioni uticaji prisustva somatskih tegoba bili su detektovani u dve specifične relacije. Pozitivnost se mogla negativno predvideti aktivnošću homeostatske koordinacije sistema (δ), ali samo kod studenata sa malim brojem somatskih tegoba, što je bio i slučaj sa sistemom regulacije organskih funkcija (χ), ali samo kod snažnog prisustva somatskih tegoba. Zaključak. Pozitivnost predstavlja dobru organizacionu i regulacionu dispoziciju za regulaciju kognitivnih, konativnih i motoričkih funkcija. Takođe, delom je moderira na prisustvom somatskih tegoba. Praktične implikacije ovih nalaza predstavljaju konkretnu podršku za razvoj pozitivnosti kod ljudi kako bi se osnažilo zdravlje ljudi.
Reference
Baumeister RF. Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self regard. New York: Plenum; 1993.
Greenberg J, Solomon S, Pyszczynski T, Rosenblatt A, Burling J, Lyon etal. Why do people need self-esteem? Converging evi-dence that self-esteem serves ananxiety-buffering function. J Pers Soc Psychol 1992; 63(6): 913‒22.
Kernis MH. Toward aconceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychol Inq 2003; 14: 1–26.
Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess 1985; 49(1): 71–5.
Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 1984; 95(3): 542–75.
Harter S. The construction of the self: A developmental per-spective. New York: Guilford; 1999.
Carver CS, Scheier MF. Optimism. In: CR Snyder, JL Lopez, ed-itors. Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 231‒43.
Diener E, Diener M. Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfac-tion and self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995; 68(4): 653‒63.
Lucas RE, Diener E, Suh E. Discriminant validity of well-being measures. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996; 71(3): 616‒28.
Caprara GV, Fagnani C, Alessandri G, Steca P, Gigantesco A, Cavalli-Sforza L, et al. Human optimal functioning. The genet-ics of positive orientation towards self, life, and the future. Behav Genet 2009; 39(3): 277–84.
Caprara GV, Steca P. Affective and social self-regulatory effi-cacy beliefs as determinants of positive thinking and happi-ness. European Psychologist 2005; 10(4): 275–286.
Caprara GV, Steca P, Alessandri G, Abela JR, McWhinnie CM. Positive orientation: explorations on what is common to life satisfaction, self-esteem, and optimism. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2010; 19(1): 63‒71.
Digman JM. Personality structure: Emergence of the five fac-tor model. Ann Rev Psychol 1990; 41(1): 417–40.
John OP, Srivastava S. The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA, editors. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1999. p. 102–38.
Caprara GV, Alessandri GA, Eisenberg N, Kupfer A, Steca P,Caprara MG, et al. The Positivity Scale. Psychol Assess 2012; 24(3): 701‒12.
Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C & Borgogni L. BFQ: Big Five Questionnaire. Firenze: O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali; 1993.
Miciuk LR, Jankowski T, Laskowska A, Oleś P. Positive Orien-tation and the Five-Factor Model. Polish Psychol Bull 2016; 47(1): 141–8.
Caprara GV, Alessandri G, Caprara M. Associations of posi-tive orientation with health and psychosocial adaptation: A review of findings and perspectives. Asian J Soc Psychol 2019; 22(2): 126‒32.
Horga S, Ignjatović I, Momirović K, Gredelj M. An attachment to the knowledge of the structure wof convective characteristics. Psihologija 1982; 15 (3‒4): 3–34 (Serbian)
Powell A, Royce JR. An overview of a multifactor-system theory of personality and individual differences: I. The factor and sys-tem models and the hierarchical factor structure of individual-ity. J Pers Soc Psychol 1981; 41(4): 818–29.
Caprara GV, Nisini R, Castellani V, Vittorio P, Alessandri G, Vincenzo Z, et al. Lymphocyte subsets are influenced by posi-tivity levels in healthy subjects before and after mild acute stress. Immunol Lett 2017; 188: 13–20.
Alessandri G, Caprara GV, De Pascalis V. Relations among EEG-alpha asymmetry and positivity personality trait. Brain Cogn 2015; 97: 10‒21.
Goodman LA. Snowball sampling. Ann Mathemat Stat 1961; 32(1): 148‒70.
Momirović K, Wolf B, Džamonja Z. KON-6. Cybernetic battery of conative tests. Belgrade: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju; 1992. (Serbian)
Međedović J. Analysis of predictor interactions in linear regres-sion models: an example of a party evaluation. Primenjena psihologija 2013; 6(3): 267–86 (Serbian)
Robinson C, Schumacher RE. Interaction effects: Centering, var-iance inflation factor, and interpretation issues. MLRW 2009; 35(1): 6–11.
Borsa JC, Damásio BF, Souza DSD, Koller SH, Caprara GV. Psychometric properties of the positivity scale - Brazilian ver-sion. Psicol Reflex Crit 2015; 28(1): 61–7.
Çıkrıkçı Ö, ÇiftçiM, Gençdoğan G. The Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Form of the Positivity Scale. J Happ Well Be-ing 2015; 3(1): 57–76. (Turkish)
Heikamp T, Alessandri G, Laguna M, Petrovic V, Caprara MG, Trommsdorff G.Cross-cultural validation of the positivity sca-lein five europeancountries. Pers Individ Diff 2014; 71: 140–5.
Łaguna M, Oles´ PK, Filipiuk D. Positive orientation and its measure: Polish adaptation of the Positivity Scale. Studia Psy-chologiczne 2011; 49: 47–54. (Polish)
Tian L, Zhang D, Huebner ES. Psychometric Properties of the Positivity Scale among Chinese Adultsand Early Adolescents. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 197.
Lauriola M, Iani L. Does Positivity Mediate the Relation of Extraversion and Neuroticism with Subjective Happiness? PLoS ONE 2015; 10(3): e0121991.
Larsen RJ, Buss DM. Personality Psychology: Domains of knowledge about human nature. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
McAdams DP, Pals JL. A New Big Five Fundamental princi-ples for an integrative science of personality. Am Psychol 2006; 61(3): 204–17.
McCrae RR, Costa PT. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J Personal Soc Psychol 1987; 52: 81‒90.
McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr, Martin TA. The NEO–PI–3: A More Readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory. J Pers Assess 2005; 84(3): 261‒70.