Uticaj osobina ličnosti i strategija suočavanja sa stresom na kvalitet života obolelih od multiple skleroze relapsno remitentnog toka
Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. Multipla skleroza (MS) je hronična, progresivna autoimunska bolest centralnog nervnog sistema, koja može narušiti kvalitet života. Osobine ličnosti i strategije suočavanja sa stresom su bitan faktor za promenljivost između osoba u odnosu na kvalitet života. Cilj istraživanja je bio ispitivanje povezanosti osobina ličnosti i strategija suočavanja kod obolelih od MS relapsno remitentnog (RR) toka, kao i isptitivanje povezanosti osobina ličnosti i strategija suočavanja sa kvalitetom života kod obolelih od MS RR toka. Metode. Opservacionom studijom preseka obuhvaćeno je 66 bolesnika (34 osobe ženskog i 32 osobe muškog pola)sa dijagnozom klinički definitivne MS RR toka, postavljene na osnovu Mek Donaldovih kriterijuma. Za procenu osobina ličnosti, strategija suočavanja i kvaliteta života, korišćene su sledeće kliničke skale: Revidirani NEO-Inventar ličnosti (NEO-PI-R), Inventar strategija suočavanja (Coping Strategies Inventory) i Kvalitet života MS (Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54). Rezultati. Prosečna starost ispitanika je bila 41,6 ± 7,1 godina. Pirsonov koeficijent korelacije pokazao je da je sa korišćenjem pasivnih strategija suočavanja pozitivno povezan jedino neuroticizam (r = 0,502). Korelacija je bila negativnog smera između neuroticizma i fizičkog (r = -0,284, p < 0,05) i mentalnog zdravlja (r = -0,289, p < 0,05), kao i između pasivnih strategija suočavanja i mentalnog zdravlja (r = -0,358, p < 0,05), što znači da su bolesnici kod kojih je neuroticizam bio više izražen, i koji su koristili pasivne strategije, imali lošiji kvalitet života. Zaključak. Rezultati ovog istraživanja ukazuju na značaj procene ličnosti i strategija suočavanja kod obolelih od MS. Uključivanje u kognitivno-bihevioralnu terapiju i favorizovanje aktivnih strategija suočavanja može poboljšati kvalitet života obolelih od MS.
Reference
Jones E, Pike J, Marshall T, Ye X. Quantifying the relationship between increased disability and health care resource utiliza-tion, quality of life, work productivity, health care costs in pa-tients with multiple sclerosis in the US. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16: 294.
Strober LB. Personality in multiple sclerosis (MS): impact on health, psychological well-being, coping, and overall quality of life. Psychol Health Med 2017; 22(2): 152‒61.
van der Krieke L, Blaauw FJ, Emerencia AC, Schenk HM, Slaets JP, Bos EH et al. Temporal Dynamics of Health and Well-Being: A Crowdsourcing Approach to Momentary Assessments and Automated Generation of Personalized Feedback. Psy-chosom Med 2017; 79(2): 213‒23.
Widiger TA, Oltmanns JR. Neuroticism is a fundamental do-main of personality with enormous public health implications. World Psychiatry 2017; 16(2): 144–5.
Bhagat V, Haque M, Simbak NB, Jaalam K. Study on personali-ty dimension negative emotionality affecting academic achievement among Malaysian medical students studying in Malaysia and overseas. Adv Med Educ Pract 2016; 7: 341–6.
Ullah FI. Personality factors and perceived social support as determinants of psychological well-being among university students. Int J Indian Psychol 2017; 4(2): 88.
Yıldız M, Şahin S, Batmaz S, Songur E, Kutlutürk F. The rela-tionship between depression, anxiety, personality traits and coping strategies of patients with euthyroid Hashimoto's Thy-roiditis. Eur J Psychiatry 2017; 31(3): 113‒8.
Connor-Smith JK, Flaschbart C. Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol 2007; 93(6): 1080‒107.
Hernández-Ledesma AL, Rodríguez-Méndez AJ, Gallardo-Vidal LS, Trejo-Cruz G, García-Solís P, Dávila-Esquivel FJ. Coping strategies and quality of life in Mexican multiple sclerosis pa-tients: Physical, psychological and social factors relationship. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2018; 25: 122‒7.
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revi-sions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2011; 69(2): 292–302.
Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992.
Maric NP, Andric S, Mihaljevic M, Mirjanic T. Openness to ex-perience shortens duration of untreated psychosis in Serbian clinical population. Early Interv Psychiatry 2018; 12(1): 91‒5.
Knezevic G, Radovic B, Opacic G. Evaluation of “Big Five” per-sonality model through analysis of personality inventories. Psihologija 1997; 30(1–2): 7–40. (Serbian)
Tobin DL, Holroyd KA, Reynolds R. Manual for the Coping Strategies Inventory. Athens, OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio University; 1984.
Vickrey BG, Hays RD, Harooni R, Myers LW, Ellison GW. A health-related quality of life measure for multiple sclerosis. Qual Life Res 1995; 4(3): 187‒206.
Pekmezovic T, Tepavcevic DK, Kostic J, Drulovic J. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the disease-specific questionnaire MSQOL-54 in Serbian multiple sclerosis patients sample. Qual Life Res 2007; 16(8): 1383‒7.
Čovičković Šternić N. National Good Clinical Practice Guide for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Belgrade: Republička stručna komisija za izradu i implementaciju vodiča dobre kliničke prakse; 2013. (Serbian)
Rojas JI, Patrucco L, MIguez J, Sinay V, Cassara FP, Cáceres F, et al. Gender ratio trends over time in multiple sclerosis patients from Argentina. J Clin Neurosci 2017; 38: 84‒6.
Rokvic V, Stanarevic S. Toward gender and LGBT equality in the Serbian armed forces. Women's Studies International Fo-rum 2016; 55: 26‒34.
South SC, Jarnecke A, Vize CE. Sex Differences in the Big Five Model Personality Traits: A Behavior Genetics Exploration. J Res Pers 2018; 74: 158‒65.
Sutin AR, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L, Terracciano A. Personality Traits and Chronic Disease: Implications for Adult Personality Development. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2013; 68(6): 912–20.
Jokela M, Hakulinen C, Singh-Manoux A, Kivimäki M. Personali-ty change associated with chronic diseases: pooled analysis of four prospective cohort studies. Psychol Med 2014; 44(12): 2629‒40.
Guo Q, Sun P, Li L. Why neurotic individuals are less proso-cial? A multiple mediation analysis regarding related mecha-nisms. Pers Individ Difer 2018; 128: 55–61.
Zarbo IR, Minacapelli E, Falautano M, Demontis S, Carpentras G, Pugliatti M. Personality traits predict perceived health-related quality of life in persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2016; 22(4): 551‒8.
Salhofer-Polanyi S, Friedrich F, Löffler S, Rommer PS, Gleiss A, Engelmaier R, et al. Health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: temperament outweighs EDSS. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18(1): 143.
Benedict RH, Priore RL, Miller C, Munschauer F, Jacobs L. Per-sonality disorder in multiple sclerosis correlates with cognitive impairment. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001; 13(1): 70‒6.
Lima AB, Paes RA, Alvarenga RM. Personality factors in re-cently diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients: a preliminary in-vestigation with the NEO-FFI scale. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2015; 73(3): 200‒4.
Jelinek GA, De Livera AM, Marck CH, Brown CR, Neate SL, Taylor KL, et al. Associations of Lifestyle, Medication, and So-cio-Demographic Factors with Disability in People with Mul-tiple Sclerosis: An International Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One 2016; 11(8): e0161701.
Afshar H, Roohafza HR, Keshteli AH, Mazaheri M, Feizi A, Adibi P. The association of personality traits and coping styles according to stress level. J Res Med Sci 2015; 20(4): 353‒8.
Gåfvels C, Hägerström M, Rane K, Wajngot A, Wändell PE. Cop-ing strategies among patients newly diagnosed with diabetes or rheumatoid arthritis at baseline and after 24 months. J Health Psychol 2018; b23(10): 1273‒86.
Rätsep T, Kallasmaa T, Pulver A, Gross-Paju K. Personality as a predictor of coping efforts in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2000; 6(6): 397‒402.
Farran N, Ammar D, Darwish H. Quality of life and coping strategies in Lebanese Multiple Sclerosis patients: A pilot study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2016; 6: 21‒7.