Procena statusa volemije ultrazvučnim pregledom donje šuplje vene i spektroskopskom bioimpendancom kod bolesnika na hemodijalizi
Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. Hipervolemija je značajan faktor rizika od razvoja kardiovaskularnog morbiditeta i moratliteta kod bolesnika koji se leče redovnom hemodijalizom. Još uvek ne postoji suverena metoda za procenu statusa volemije kod tih bolesnika. Cilj istraživanja bio je da se merenjem parametara donje šuplje vene i merenjem bioimpedance proceni status volemije kod bolesnika koji se leče redovnom hemodijalizom. Metode. Ispitivan je uticaj tretmana hemodijalizom na ultrazvučne parametre donje šuplje vene, kao i na parametre merene spektroskopskom bioimpedancom (SB) pre i posle hemodijalize. Merene su i vrednosti N-terminalnog prohormona moždanog natriuretskog peptida (NT-proBNP) pre i posle hemodijalize. U neinterventnu studiju preseka bilo je uključeno 45 bolesnika koji se leče standardnom bikarbonatnom dijalizom. Prema intradijaliznom prinosu bolesnici su bili podeljeni u tri grupe: I (do 2 000 mL), II (2 000 – 3 000 mL), III (preko 3 000 mL). Rezultati. Vrednosti parametara donje šuplje vene i parametara izmerenih SB-om bili su značajno niži nakon tretmana hemodijalizom (p < 0.005). Treća grupa bolesnika imala je značajno veću ukupnu zapreminu tečnosti u organizmu pre hemodijalize u poređenju sa I grupom, kao i značajno veću zapreminu vanćelijske tečnosti (p < 0,005). Nakon hemodijalize detektovane su značajno niže vrednosti NT-proBNP-a u svim grupama (p < 0,005). Posle tretmana hemodijalizom, zabeležena je pozitivna korelacija između koncentracije NT-proBNP-a u serumu i odnosa ekstracelularne/intracelularne tečnosti; međutim korelacija između koncentracije NT-proBNP-a i ukupne tečnosti izmerene putem SB nije dostigla statističku značajnost. Zaključak. Merenje ultrazvučnih parametara donje šuplje vene i parametara volemije SB-om u značajnoj meri doprinosi proceni statusa volemije, ali se ne može koristiti kao odvojeni parametar, već u kombinaciji sa svim drugim metodama.
Reference
Petrović D. Chronic kidney disease in clinical practice. Kraguje-vac: InterPrint; 2014. (Serbian)
Henderson LW: Symptomatic hypotension during hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1980; 17(5): 571‒6.
Cheriex EC, Leunissen KM, Janssen JH, Mooy JM, van Hooff JP. Echography of the inferior vena cava is a simple and reliable tool for estimation of “dry weight” in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1989: 4(6): 563–8.
Di Lullo L, Floccari F, Granata A, D'Amelio A, Rivera R, Fiorini F, et al. Ultrasonography: Ariadne's Thread in the Diagnosis of the Cardiorenal Syndrome. Cardiorenal Med 2012; 2(1): 11‒7.
Gheorghiade M, Pang PS. Acute heart failure syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53(7): 557‒3.
Cristina Di Gioia M, Gascuena R, Gallar P, Cobo G, Camacho R, Acosta N, et al. Echocardiographic findings in haemodialysis patients according to their state of hydration. Nefrología 2017; 37(1): 47‒53.
Sabaghian T, Hajibaratali B, Samavat S. Which echocardio-graphic parameter is a better marker of volume status in he-modialysis patients? Ren Fail 2016; 38(10): 1659‒64.
Cohen-Solal A. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: patho-physiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13(Suppl 4): 3‒5.
Hamlin SK, Villars PS, Kanusky JT, Shaw AD. Role of diastole in left ventricular function II: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Crit Care 2004; 13(6): 453‒66; quiz 467‒8.
Kaptein MJ, Kaptein JS, Oo Z, Kaptein EM. Relationship of infe-rior vena cava collapsibility to ultrafiltration volume achieved in critically ill hemodialysis patients. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2018; 11: 195‒209.
Brennan JM, Ronan A, Goonewardena S, Blair JE, Hammes M, Shah D, et al. Handcarried ultrasound measurement of the in-ferior vena cava for assessment of intravascular volume status in the outpatient hemodialysis clinic. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1(4): 749‒53.
Munizt Pazeli J, Fagundes Vidigal D, Cestari Grossi T, Silva Fer-nandes NM, Colugnati F, Baumgratz de Pula R, et al. Can Neph-rologists Use Ultrasound to Evaluate the Inferior Vena Cava? A Cross-Sectional Study of the Agreement between a Neph-rologist and a Cardiologist. Nephron Extra 2014; 4(1): 82–8.
Natori H, Tamaki S, Kira S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of ventilatory effect on inferior vena cava configuration. Am Rev Resp Dis 1979; 120(2): 421‒7.
Lyon ML, Verma N. Ultrasound Guided Volume Assessment Using Inferior Vena Cava Diameter. Open Access Emerg Med 2010; 3(1): 22‒4.
Gargani L. Lung ultrasound a new tool for the cardiologist. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2011; 9: 6.
Picano E, Gargani L, Gheorghiade M. Why, when and how to as-sess pulmonary congestion in heart failure: pathophysiological, clinical, and methodological implications. Heart Fail Rev 2010; 15(1): 63‒72.
Wang H, Liang S, Wang M, Gao J, Sun C, Wang J, et al. Poten-tial serum biomarkers from a metabolomics study of autism. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2016; 41(1): 27‒37.
Zoccali C, Mallamaci F, Benedetto FA, Tripepi G, Parlongo S, Cataliotti A, et al. Cardiac natriuretic peptides are related to left ventricular mass and function and predict mortality in di-alysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12(7): 1508‒15.
Booth J, Pinney J, Davenport A. N-terminal proBNP - Marker of cardiac dysfunction, fluid overload, or malnutrition in hemo-dialysis patients? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5(6): 1036‒40.
Madsen LH, Ladefoged S, Corell P, Schou M, Hildebrandt PR, Atar D. N terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide predicts mor-tality in patients with end-stage renal disease in hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2007; 71(6): 548‒54.
Mark PB, Stewart GA, Gansevoort RT, Petrie CJ, McDonagh TA, Dargie HJ, et al. Diagnostic potential of circulating natriuretic peptides in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21(2): 402‒10.
Matthie JR. Bioimpedance measurements of human body com-position: critical analysis and outlook. Expert Rev Med De-vices 2018; 5(2): 239‒61.
Davies SJ, Davenport A. The role of bioimpedance and bi-omarkers in helping to aid clinical decision-making of volume assessments in dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2014; 86(3): 489‒96.
Wabel P, Moissl U, Chamney P, Jirka T, Machek P, Ponce P, et al. Towards improved cardiovascular management: The necessity of combining blood pressure and fluid overload. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23(9): 2965‒71.
Machek P, Jirka T, Moissl U, Chamney P, Wabel P. Guided op-timization of fluid status in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25(2): 538‒44.
NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Adequacy: update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37(1 Suppl 1): S7‒S64.
Krause I, Birk E, Davidovits M, Cleper R., Blieden L, Pinhas L, et al. Inferior vena cava diameter: a useful method for estimation of fluid status in children on haemodialysis. Nephro Dial Transplant 2001; 16(6): 1203-6.
London GM. Ultrafiltration intensification for achievement of dry weight and hypertension control is not always the thera-peutic gold standard. J Nephrol 2011; 24(4): 395‒7.
David S, Kumpers P, Seidler V, Biertz F, Haller H, Fliser D. Di-agnostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for left ventricular dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23(4): 1370‒7.
Velasco N, Chamney P, Wabel P, Moissl U, Imtiaz T, Spalding E, et al. Optimal fluid control can normalize cardiovascular risk markers and limit left ventricular hypertrophy in thrice weekly dialysis patients. Hemodial Int 2012; 16(4): 465‒72.
Paunic Z, Dekleva-Manojlovic M, Markovic-Nikolic N, Rancic N, Dimkovic N. Impact of active fluid management on cardiac hemodynamic and mechanics in patients on maintenance he-modialysis. Vojnosanit Pregl 2020; 77(1): 60‒9.
Tabinor M, Elphick E, Dudson M, Kwok CS, Lambie M, Davies SJ. Bioimpedance-defined overhydration predicts survival in end-stage kidney failure (ESKF): systematic review and sub-group meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2018; 8(1): 4441.
Chamney PW, Krämer M, Rode C, Kleinekofort W, Wizemann V. A new technique for establishing dry weight in hemodialysis patients via whole body bioimpedance. Kidney Int 2002; 61(6): 2250‒8.