Obrazovanje zdravstvenih radnika u Srbiji: procena i mere za unapređenje kvaliteta kroz praksu, interprofesionalno obrazovanje i razvoj nastavničkih kompetencija
Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. Obrazovanje u oblasti zdravstva suočava se sa novim pitanjima. Da bi se odgovorilo na savremene zahteve obrazovanja zdravstvenih radnika, sprovedena je sveobuhvatna situaciona analiza. Cilj istraživanja bio je da se istraže stavovi, percepcije i prepoznaju potrebe akademske zajednice, zdravstvenih radnika i studenata zdravstvenih
profesija, u odnosu prema učenju u realnom radnom okruženju, tj. nastavi u praksi (experiential education – EE), interprofesionalnom obrazovanju (interprofessional education – IPE) i unapređenju nastavničkih kompetencija (teaching competencies development – TCD). Radi daljeg unapređenja u oblasti obrazovanja, za zdravstvene radnike u Srbiji obezbeđeno je kritičko vrednovanje postojećih standarda kvaliteta. Metode. Istraživanje je sprovedeno u okviru projekta Reinforcement of the Framework for Experiential Education in Serbia (ReFEEHS), ko-finansiranog od strane Erasmus+ programa Evropske komisije na četiri univerziteta u Republici Srbiji (Univerzitet u Beogradu, Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, Univerzitet u Nišu i Univerzitet u Novom Sadu). Određene su četiri radne grupe, sa zadatkom razmatranja trenutnih kurikuluma, preporuka i prakse u okviru svake zdravstvene profesije (medicina, farmacija, stomatologija, sestrinstvo), kao i procene njihove usklađenosti sa relevantnim preporukama i praksom u obrazovanju u Evropskoj uniji. Rezultati. U istraživanju je učestvovalo 1 507 ispitanika. Pozitivan stav prema EE, IPE i TCD zabeležen je među svim ispitanicima. Više od 70% ispitanika iskazalo je stav o tome da je potrebno organizovati EE, tj. nastavu u praksi u realnom radnom okruženju, što bi podrazumevalo stručni rad studenata pod nadzorom kompetentnog mentora, ali i interakciju sa bolesnicima, kao i interakciju sa zdravstvenim radnicima. Oko 90% ispitanika podržalo je uključivanje IPE nastavnih aktivnosti u kurikulume; 77% studenata izrazilo je motivisanost da prisustvuju zajedničkim predmetima, dok je čak 93% nastavnika i saradnika iskazalo volju da učestvuju u kreiranju i podučavanju nastavnih jedinica u okviru IPE. Prethodno je samo 20% nastavnika/saradnika pohađalo neki TCD program, dok je čak 75% prepoznalo potrebu za organizacijom tih programa; 90% zdravstvenih radnika smatralo je da su za efikasan mentorski rad u obrazovanju u oblasti zdravstvene nauke potrebne dodatne veštine mentora/kliničkih supervizora. Na osnovu sagledanih rezultata upitnika, date su preporuke za unapređenje visokog obrazovanja u okviru tri obrazovne oblasti budućih zdravstvenih radnika, koje se odnose na kurikulum, studentsku stručnu praksu/klinički staž, nastavno osoblje i regulatorne aspekte. Zaključak. Dobijeni rezultati korišćeni su kao polazna, ali veoma značajna tačka za unapređenje visokog obrazovanja u Srbiji. Sve zainteresovane strane – akademska zajednica, studenti, zdravstveni radnici i regulatorna tela, treba da sarađuju u cilju postizanja unapređenog i savremenog obrazovanja zdravstvenih radnika.
Reference
1. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2001 Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog
/>/10027 [cited 2020 September 9].
2. World Health Organization (WHO). Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice [Internet]. 2010 Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/20
/>10/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf?ua=1 [cited 2020 February 11].
3. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010; 376(9756): 1923–58.
4. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications [Internet]. 2005. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32005L0036
5. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32013L0055
6. World Health Organization (WHO). Transforming and scaling up health professionals’ education and training [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Feb 11]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/
/>bitstream/handle/10665/93635/9789241506502_eng.pdf?seq
uence=1
7. World Federation for Medical Education (WFME). WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement: Basic Medical Education [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 May 7]. Available from: https://wfme.org/download/wfme-global-standards-for-quali
/>ty-improvement-bme/?wpdmdl=831&refresh=5f58c26b97bce
1599652459%22%3EDownload%3C/a%3E%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%3C/div%3E%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%3C/div%3E%20%20%20%20%3C/div%3E%3C/div%3E%3C/div%3E
8. International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP). Quality Assurance of Pharmacy Education: the FIP Global Framework [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 May 7]. Available from: https://www.fip.org/www/streamfile.php?filename=fip/PharmacyEduction/Quality_Assurance/QA_Framework_2nd_Edi
/>tion_online_version.pdf
9. Commission on Dental Accreditation. Accreditation Standards For Dental Education Programs [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May 7]. Available from: https://www.ada.org/~/media/COD
/>A/Files/predoc_standards.pdf?la=en
10. World Health Organization (WHO). Global standards for the initial education of professional nurses and midwives. [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2020 May 7]. Available from: https://www.who.int/hrh/nursing_midwifery/hrh_global_standards_education.pdf
11. van Zanten M, Boulet JR, Greaves I. The importance of medical education accreditation standards. Med Teach 2012; 34(2): 136–45.
12. Sjöström H, Christensen L, Nystrup J, Karle H. Quality assurance of medical education: Lessons learned from use and analysis of the WFME global standards. Med Teach 2019; 41(6): 650–5.
13. Blouin D, Tekian A. Accreditation of Medical Education Programs: Moving From Student Outcomes to Continuous Quality Improvement Measures. Acad Med 2018; 93(3): 377–83.
14. European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), European Students’ Union (ESU), European University Association (EUA), European Association of Institutions in Higher Education (EURASHE). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG) [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://enqa.eu/wp-ontent/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf>
15. National Entity for Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education (NEAQA). Regulations on Standards and Procedures for Accreditation of Higher Education Institutions [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May 7]. Available from: https://www.nat.rs/en/regulations/
16. National Entity for Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education (NEAQA). Regulations on Standards for Initial Accreditation of Higher Education Institutions and Study Programmes [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May 7]. Available from: https://www.nat.rs/en/regulations/
17. National Entity for Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education (NEAQA). Regulations on Standards and Procedure for Accreditation of Study Programmes [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May 7]. Available from: https://www.nat.rs/en/regulations/
18. National Entity for Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education (NEAQA). Rulebook on standards and procedure for external quality control of higher education institutions [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May 7]. Available from: https://www.nat.rs/en/regulations/
19. National Entity for Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education (NEAQA). Regulation on standards for self-evaluation and quality assessment of higher education institutions and study program [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May 7]. Available from: https://www.nat.rs/en/regulations/
20. Harden RM, Crosby J. AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer - the twelve roles of the teacher. Med Teach 2000; 22(4): 334–47.
21. ReFEEHS Preparation Working Group. Health professions education in Serbia The Need for Change Report [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Apr 04]. Available from: https://refeehs.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ReFEEH
/>S-Project-Need-for-Change-Report-1.pdf
22. International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP). Strategic plan 2019-2024. [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Apr 28]. Available from: https://www.fip.org/file/4369
23. Association for Experiential Education. What is Experiential Education? [Internet]. [cited 2020 Sep 3]. Available from: https://www.aee.org/what-is-ee
24. Hill B. Research into experiential learning in nurse education. Br J Nurs 2017; 26(16): 932–8.
25. Alvarez S, Schultz JH. A communication-focused curriculum for dental students – an experiential training approach. BMC Med Educ 2018; 18(1): 55.
26. Boonyasai RT, Windish DM, Chakraborti C, Feldman LS, Rubin HR, Bass EB. Effectiveness of Teaching Quality Improvement to Clinicians: A Systematic Review. JAMA 2007; 298(9): 1023.
27. Ogrinc G, Headrick LA, Mutha S, Coleman MT, OʼDonnell J, Miles PV. A Framework for Teaching Medical Students and Residents about Practice-based Learning and Improvement, Synthesized from a Literature Review: Acad Med 2003; 78(7): 748–56.
28. McKenzie S, Mellis C. Practically prepared? Pre-intern student views following an education package. Adv Med Educ Pract 2017; 8: 111–20.
29. Bradham TS, Sponsler KC, Watkins SC, Ehrenfeld JM. Creating a Quality Improvement Course for Undergraduate Medical Education: Practice What You Teach. Acad Med 2018; 93(10): 1491–6.
30. Krajnović D, Bulat P, Bojanić V, Ilić J. Quality Assurance Standards for Student Professional Practice Placement in Health Professions Education [Internet]. Belgrade, 2018. [cited 2020 Feb 10]. Available from: https://refeehs.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Standardi.pdf>
31. Đukić-Ćosić D, Tasić Lj. Interprofessional education [Internet]. Belgrade, 2018. [cited 2020 Feb 10]. Available from: https://refeehs.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/IPE.pdf
32. Medić S, Parojčić J, Odalović M, Đukić-Ćosić D, Radulović L, Stančić M, et al. Teaching competencies development and evaluation: Guidelines for quality health professions education [Internet]. Belgrade, 2018. [cited 2020 Feb 10]. Available from: https://refeehs.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Teaching
/>-competencies-development-handbook.pdf
33. Lindqvist S, Anderson E, Diack L, Reeves S. CAIPE Fellows statement on integrative care [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://www.caipe.org/resources/publications/caipe-publicati
/>ons/lindqvist-s-anderson-e-diack-l-reeves-s-2017-caipe-fellows
-statement-integrative-care