Vrednost Gissane-ovog ugla kod stanovništva centralne Srbije

  • Milan Kovačević University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Ivona Banković University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Milan Aksić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Jovan Rakić University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kragujevac, Serbia
  • Aleksandar Radunović Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Maja Vulović University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kragujevac, Serbia
Ključne reči: antropometrija, kalkaneus, kost, prelomi, zaceljenje, radiografija, pol, faktori, srbija

Sažetak


Uvod/Cilj. Određivanje vrednosti Gissane-ovog ugla (GU) ima ulogu u dijagnostikovanju i prognozi preloma pete, određivanju metoda lečenja, i u proceni uspeha operativnog lečenja tog preloma. Normalne vrednosti GU pokazuju varijacije u odnosu na etničku pripadnost, životno doba i pol ispitivane grupe, što ukazuje na njegov antropometrijski značaj. Cilj istraživanja bio je utvrđivanje raspona normalnih vrednosti GU kod stanovništva centralne Srbije. Metode. GU je određivan na lateralnim radiografijama stopala 145 ispitanika, oba pola (67 žena i 78 muškaraca), a ispitanici su bili podeljeni u 6 starosnih grupa. Ispitanici koji su bili uključeni u istraživanje nisu imali prelom petne kosti. Dobijeni rezultati su obrađivani u Graph Pad programu. Rezultati. Prosečna vrednost GU u centralnoj Srbiji iznosila je 110.8° ± 8.1°, u rasponu od 93° do 132.9°. Utvrđeno je smanjenje srednje vrednosti GU sa povećanjem godina života, a nije nađena razlika između žena i muškaraca, izuzev u najmlađoj starosnoj grupi, u kojoj su žene imale veće vrednosti GU od muškaraca. Zaključak. Rezultati ispitivanja pokazali su veliki raspon normalnih vrednosti GU, kao i postojanje razlika kod ispitanika različite starosti i pola.

Reference

Daftary A, Haims AH, Baumgaertner MR. Fractures of the cal-caneus: a review with emphasis on CT. Radiographics 2005; 25(5): 1215‒26.

Linsenmaier U, Brunner U, Schöning A, Rieger J, Krötz M, Mutsch-ler W, et al. Classification of calcaneal fractures by spiral com-puted tomography: implications for surgical treatment. Eur Radiol 2003; 13(10): 2315–22.

Sengodan VC, Amruth KH, Karthikeyan S. Bohler's and Gissane Angles in the Indian Population. J Clin Imaging Sci 2012; 2: 77.

Amuti T, Muuthuri N, Nichome L, Ouko I, Misiani M, Olabu B, et al. Morphometric Dimensions of the Calcaneus. J Foot An-kle Surg 2020; 59(5): 949‒52.

Khoshhal KI, Ibrahim AF, Al-Nakshabandi NA, Zamzam MM, Al-Boukai AA, Zamzami MM. Böhler's and Gissane's angles of the calcaneus in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2004; 25(12): 1967‒70.

Palmersheim K, Hines B, Olsen BL. Calcaneal fractures: update on current treatments. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2012; 29(2): 205‒20, vii.

Agoada D. The relationship between linear osteological and ra-diographic measurements of the human calcaneus and ta-lus. Anat Rec 2017; 301(1): 21‒33.

Ramachandran R, Shetty S. Assessment of Bohler's and Gissane's angles of the calcaneum in a group of South Indian popula-tion-a radiological study. Int J Cur Res Rev 2015; 7(15): 17‒20.

Guo J, Wang S, Chen J, Li H. Calcaneus Radiograph Analysis System: Calcaneal Angles Measurement and Fracture Identifi-cation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04536.2019, December 10 [cited on 2020 September 1] Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04536

Gissane W. Discussion on “Fractures of the os calcis”. Proceedings of the British Orthopaedic Association. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1947; 29: 254‒5.

da Silva Louro EC, Faleiro TB, Pereira, TM, de Souza Ferreira LD, Rezende RG, Andrade TA. Radiographic study of Böhler and Gissane angles in the Brazilian population. J Foot Ankle. 2020; 14(1): 57‒61.

Shoukry FA, Aref YK, Sabry AAE. Evaluation of the normal calcaneal angles in Egyptian population. Alex J Med 2012; 48(2): 91‒7.

Seyahi A, Uludağ S, Koyuncu LO, Atalar AC, Demirhan M. The calcaneal angles in the Turkish population. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2009; 43(5): 406‒11. (Turkish)

Kim JH, Gwak HC, Kim JG, Jung, YH. Measurement of normal calcaneus in Korean cadavers: a preliminary report. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc 2018; 18(1): 14‒8.

Schmutz B, Lüthi, M, Schmutz-Leong YK, Shulman R, Platt S. Morphological analysis of Gissane’s angle utilising a statistical shape model of the calcaneus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03566-5. (In Press)

Barinem G, Udoaka AI. Radiological evaluation of the calcane-al parameters in an adult Nigerian population. J Med Sci Clin Res 2015; 3(8): 7112‒7.

Alabi AS, Mohammed BE, Lewu SF, Neku RO, Kareem, BS, Oyewopo OA, et al. Radiological assessment of the calcaneal an-gles of Kwara populace: A retrospective study. Int J Health Allied Sci 2020; 9(1): 29.

Pombo B, Ferreira AC, Costa L. Bohler Angle and the Crucial Angle of Gissane in Paediatric Population. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 12: 1179544119835227.

Davis D, Seaman TJ, Newton EJ. Calcaneus Frac-tures. StatPearls [Internet]. 2020, August 8 [cited on 2020 September 5]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430861/

Pradhan CS, Gupta TSK, Mohanty A, Panigrahi SA. Comparative study on outcome of maintaining Bohler angle and Gissane angle in the treatment of calcaneum fracture: A retrospective analysis. Nat J Clin Orthop 2019; 3(3): 90‒5.

Objavljeno
2022/09/21
Rubrika
Originalni članak