Uticaj različitih tipova prezervacionih rastvora na integritet endotela safenske vene u koronarnoj hirurgiji kod bolesnika sa dijabetesom melitusom podvrgnutih hirurškoj revaskularizaciji miokarda
Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. Uprkos opravdanom porastu popularnosti totalne arterijske revaskularizacije, graft safenske vene (GSV) ostaje jedan od najkorišćenijih provodnika u hirurškoj revaskularizaciji miokarda (coronary artery bypass grafting – CABG). Jedan od odlučujućih faktora trajnosti tog provodnika je integritet njegovog endotela u vreme operacije. Cilj rada bio je da se kod bolesnika podvrgnutih CABG sa tip 2 dijabetesom melitusom (T2DM) i kod bolesnika bez T2DM ispita uticaj prezervacionih rastvora na integritet endotelnih ćelija GSV. Rastvori koji su procenjivani bili su: heparinizirani fiziološki rastvor (sol. 0,9% NaCl), heparinizirana puna autologna krv, Bretschneider-ov histidin-triptofan-ketoglutarat (HTK) rastvor i rastvor sveže zamrznute plazme (SZP). Metode. U studiju je bilo uključeno 40 bolesnika podeljenih u dve grupe: grupu A, u kojoj su bila 23 bolesnika sa T2DM i grupu B, sa 17 bolesnika bez T2DM. Efekti prezervacionih rastvora ispitivani su imunohistohemijskim bojenjem anti-CD34 antitelom i morfometrijskim poređenjem histoloških uzoraka bolesnika sa T2DM, podvrgnutih CABG između jula 2021. i septembra 2022. godine, sa uzorcima koji su dali bolesnici koji nisu imali T2DM. Rezultati. Najbolji efekat na očuvanje integriteta endotela GSV imao je rastvor SZP, sa prosečnim očuvanjem integriteta endotela od 92,2%. Najnepovoljniji efekat imao je rastvor HTK, sa prosečnim očuvanjem integriteta endotela od 26,77%. Nije bilo statistički značajne razlike rezultata između grupa A i B. Postojao je primetan, mada ne statistički značajan, kontrast u očuvanju integriteta endotela GSV između bolesnika sa T2DM i bolesnika bez T2DM. Zaključak. U konvencionalnom metodu CABG, prezervacioni rastvor sa najboljim efektom na očuvanje integriteta endotela GSV bio je rastvor SZP.
Reference
Barquera S, Pedroza-Tobías A, Medina C, Hernández-Barrera L, Bibbins-Domingo K, Lozano R, et al. Global Overview of the Epidemiology of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. Arch Med Res 2015; 46(5): 328–38.
Ruttmann E, Fischler N, Sakic A, Chevtchik O, Alber H, Schistek R, et al. Second Internal Thoracic Artery Versus Radial Artery in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: a long-term, propensity score-matched follow-up study. Circulation 2011; 124(12): 1321–9.
Melly L, Torregrossa G, Lee T, Jansens JL, Puskas JD. Fifty years of coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10(3): 1960–7.
Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, Ovitt T, Sethi G, Copeland JG, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: re-sults from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44(11): 2149–56.
Brilakis ES, Rao SV, Banerjee S, Goldman S, Shunk KA, Holmes DR, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Native Ar-teries Versus Bypass Grafts in Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4(8): 844–50.
Zivkovic I, Krasic S, Stankovic M, Milacic P, Milutinovic A, Zdravkovic D, et al. Influence of Three Different Surgical Techniques on Microscopic Damage of Saphenous Vein Grafts—A Randomized Study. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59(2): 217.
Hussaini BE, Lu XG, Wolfe JA, Thatte HS. Evaluation of en-doscopic vein extraction on structural and functional viability of saphenous vein endothelium. J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 6: 82.
Botman CJ, Schonberger J, Koolen S, Penn O, Botman H, Dib N, et al. Does Stenosis Severity of Native Vessels Influence Bypass Graft Patency? A Prospective Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Study. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83(6): 2093–7.
Weiss DR, Juchem G, Kemkes BM, Gansera B, Nees S. Extensive deendothelialization and thrombogenicity in routinely pre-pared vein grafts for coronary bypass operations: facts and remedy. Int J Clin Exp Med 2009; 2(2): 95–113.
Ak E, Ak K, Midi A, Kervancıoğlu-Demirci E, Arsan S, Çetinel Ş, et al. Histopathologic evaluation of saphenous vein grafts in patients with type II diabetes mellitus undergoing coronary ar-tery bypass grafting. Cardiovasc Pathol 2021; 52: 107328.
Korte S, Wiesinger A, Straeter AS, Peters W, Oberleithner H, Kusche-Vihrog K. Firewall function of the endothelial gly-cocalyx in the regulation of sodium homeostasis. Pflugers Arch 2012; 463(2): 269–78.
Singh SK, Desai ND, Petroff SD, Deb S, Cohen EA, Radhakrish-nan S, et al. The impact of diabetic status on coronary artery bypass graft patency: insights from the radial artery patency study. Circulation 2008; 118(14 Suppl): S222–5.
Gundry SR, Jones M, Ishihara T, Ferrans VJ. Intraoperative Trauma to Human Saphenous Veins: Scanning Electron Mi-croscopic Comparison of Preparation Techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 1980; 30(1): 40–7.
Tsakok M, Montgomery-Taylor S, Tsakok T. Storage of saphenous vein grafts prior to coronary artery bypass grafting: is autolo-gous whole blood more effective than saline in preserving graft function? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 15(4): 720–5.
Wilbring M, Ebner A, Schoenemann K, Knaut M, Tugtekin SM, Zatschler B, et al. Heparinized blood better preserves cellular energy charge and vascular functions of intraoperatively stored saphenous vein grafts in comparison to isotonic sodium-chloride-solution. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2013; 55(4): 445–55.
Lawrie GM, Weilbacher DE, Henry PD. Endothelium-dependent relaxation in human saphenous vein grafts. Effects of preparation and clinicopathologic correlations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 100(4): 612–20.
Zerkowski HR, Knocks M, Konerding MA, Doetsch N, Roth G, Hakim K, et al. Endothelial damage of the venous graft in CABG. Influence of solutions used for storage and rinsing on endothelial function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1993; 7(7): 376–82.
Chester AH, O'Neil GS, Tadjakarimi S, Borland JA, Yacoub MH. Effect of peri-operative storage solution on the vascular reactivity of the human saphenous vein. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1993; 7(8): 399–404.
Reitsma S, Slaaf DW, Vink H, van Zandvoort MA, oude Egbrink MG. The endothelial glycocalyx: composition, functions, and visualization. Pflugers Arch 2007; 454(3): 345–59.
Weiss DR, Juchem G, Eblenkamp M, Kemkes BM, Gansera B, Geier M, et al. Search for optimized conditions for sealing and storage of bypass vessels: influence of preservation solution and filling pressure on the degree of endothelialization. Int J Clin Exp Med 2010; 3(1): 10–27.
Teloh JK, Ansorge L, Petersen M, Demircioglu E, Waack IN, Brauckmann S, et al. Histidine Metabolism After Bretschneider Cardioplegia in Cardiac Surgical Patients. Physiol Res 2018; 67(2): 209–16.
Westerband A, Mills JL, Hunter GC, Gentile AT, Ihnat D, Heimark RL. Topography of cell replication in human vein graft stenoses. Circulation 1998; 98(19 Suppl): II325–9; dis-cussion II329–30.
Davignon J, Ganz P. Role of Endothelial Dysfunction in Ather-osclerosis. Circulation 2004; 109(23 Suppl 1): III27–32.
Autar A, Taha A, van Duin R, Krabbendam-Peters I, Duncker DJ, Zijlstra F, et al. Endovascular procedures cause transient en-dothelial injury but do not disrupt mature neointima in Drug Eluting Stents. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 2173.
Unal Y, Iriz E, Yilmazer D, Kavutcu M, Alper M, Kurtipek O, et al. Effects of lidocaine on membrane stabilization in harvested vein graft storage. Saudi Med J 2009; 30(2): 203–8.