Validacija i adaptacija srpske verzije upitnika Marijuana Effect Expectancies Questionnaire među adolescentima
Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. Očekivanja o dejstvu kanabisa povezana su sa početkom i učestalošću njegovog korišćenja. Jedan od najčešće korišćenih instrumenata za merenje očekivanog dejstva kanabisa je Upitnik očekivanih efekata upotrebe marihuane (Marijuana Effect Expectancy Questionnaire – MEEQ). Cilj rada bio je da se utvrde psihometrijska svojstva srpske adaptacije MEEQ za primenu kod učenika srednjih škola. Metode. U retrospektivnu studiju uključeno je 1 642 učenika srednjih škola (52,3% ženskog pola) iz Južnobačkog okruga, Vojvodina, Srbija. Uz MEEQ, korišćen je i Upitnik o nameri upotrebe kanabisa (Cannabis Use Intention Questionnaire – CUIQ), kao i mera samoprocene upotrebe kanabisa. Rezultati. Originalni šestofaktorski model MEEQ pokazao je najbolje fit indekse sa sledećim faktorima: Kognitivno oštećenje i poremećaj ponašanja, Relaksacija i smanjenje napetosti, Socijalna i seksualna facilitacija, Perceptualno i kognitivno poboljšanje, Globalni negativni efekti i Žudnja i fizički efekti. Sve MEEQ skale pokazale su pozitivne i očekivane korelacije sa CUIQ skalama, među kojima je najviša korelacija bila sa skalom Pozitivni stavovi prema konzumaciji. Korelacije sa samoprocenom upotrebe kanabisa bile su značajne za sve MEEQ skale, osim za Kognitivno oštećenje i poremećaj ponašanja. Zaključak. Rezultati su ukazali na dobre psihometrijske karakteristike srpske adaptacije MEEQ. Rezultati su takođe potvrdili i originalno predloženu faktorsku strukturu, dobru pouzdanost skorova na skalama zasnovanu na internoj konzistenciji, kao i konvergentnu i kriterijumsku validnost.
Reference
Blakemore SJ. Adolescence and mental health. The Lancet 2019; 393(10185): 2030–1.
Sharp C, Wall K. Personality pathology grows up: adolescence as a sensitive period. Curr Opin Psychol 2018; 21: 111–6.
Cunningham RM, Walton MA, Carter PM. The major causes of death in children and adolescents in the United States. N Engl J Med 2018; 379(25): 2468–75.
World Health Organization. Adolescent and young adult health 2023 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 2024, April 10; accessed 2024, Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int
/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescents-health-risks-and-s
olutions
Kipping RR, Smith M, Heron J, Hickman M, Campbell R. Multi-ple risk behavior in adolescence and socio-economic status: findings from a UK birth cohort. Eur J Public Health 2015; 25(1): 44–9.
Kolbe LJ, Kann L, Collins JL. Overview of the youth risk be-havior surveillance system. Public Health Rep 1993; 108 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): 2–10.
Scott JC, Slomiak ST, Jones JD, Rosen AFG, Moore TM, Gur RC. Association of cannabis with cognitive functioning in adoles-cents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2018; 75(6): 585–95.
Carvalho AF, Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, Kloiber S, Maes M, Firth J, et al. Cannabis use and suicide attempts among 86,254 ado-lescents aged 12–15 years from 21 low-and middle-income countries. Eur Psychiatry 2019; 56(1): 8–13.
Cyrus E, Coudray MS, Kiplagat S, Mariano Y, Noel I, Galea JT, et al. A review investigating the relationship between cannabis use and adolescent cognitive functioning. Curr Opin Psychol 2021; 38: 38–48.
Hasin D, Walsh C. Cannabis use, cannabis use disorder, and comorbid psychiatric illness: a narrative review. J Clin Med 2020; 10(1): 15.
Pacheco-Colón I, Ramirez AR, Gonzalez R. Effects of adolescent cannabis use on motivation and depression: A systematic re-view. Curr Addict Rep 2019; 6(4): 532–46.
World Health Organization. The health and social effects of nonmedical cannabis use [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2016. [cited 2024, May 9; accessed 2024 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241510240
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Euro-pean Drug Report 2022: Trends and Developments [Internet]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2022 [cited 2024, May 23; accessed 2024 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publicati
ons/14644/TDAT22001ENN.pdf
ESPAD Group. ESPAD Report 2019: Results from the Euro-pean School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs [In-ternet]. Luxembourg: EMCDDA Joint Publications, Publica-tions Office of the European Union; 2020 [cited 2024, June 15; accessed 2024, Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.espad.org/sites/espad.org/files/2020.3878_EN_04.pdf
Institute of Public Health of Serbia. The 2019 Serbian National Health Survey [Internet]. OMNIA BGD: EU for Develop-ment of Statistics in Serbia; 2021 [cited 2024, June 20; ac-cessed 2024, Nov 1]. Available from: http://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/
G2021/pdfE/G20216003.pdf
Goldman MS, Brown SA, Christiansen BA. Expectancy theory: Thinking about drinking. In: Blane HT, Leonard KE, editors. Psychological theories of drinking and alcoholism. New York: Guilford Press; 1987. pp. 181–226.
Schafer J, Brown SA. Marijuana and cocaine effect expectancies and drug use patterns. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59(4): 558–65.
Pedersen ER, Miles JN, Osilla KC, Ewing BA, Hunter SB, D’Amico EJ. The effects of mental health symptoms and mari-juana expectancies on marijuana use and consequences among at-risk adolescents. J Drug Issues 2015; 45(2): 151–65.
Buckner JD, Schmidt NB. Marijuana effect expectancies: Rela-tions to social anxiety and marijuana use problems. Addict Behav 2008; 33(11): 1477–83.
Galen LW, Henderson MJ. Validation of cocaine and marijuana effect expectancies in a treatment setting. Addict Behav 1999; 24(5): 719–24.
Hayaki J, Hagerty CE, Herman DS, de Dios MA, Anderson BJ, Stein MD. Expectancies and marijuana use frequency and se-verity among young females. Addict Behav 2010; 35(11): 995–1000.
Aarons GA, Brown SA, Stice E, Coe MT. Psychometric evalua-tion of the marijuana and stimulant effect expectancy ques-tionnaires for adolescents. Addict Behav 2001; 26(2): 219–36.
Hayaki J, Herman DS, Hagerty CE, de Dios MA, Anderson BJ, Stein MD. Expectancies and self-efficacy mediate the effects of impulsivity on marijuana use outcomes: An application of the acquired preparedness model. Addict Behav 2011; 36(4): 389–96.
Guillem E, Notides C, Vorspan F, Debray M, Nieto I, Leroux M, et al. Cannabis expectancies in substance misusers: French val-idation of the marijuana effect expectancy questionnaire. Am J Addict 2011; 20(6): 543–54.
Schmits E, Quertemont E, Guillem E, Mathys C. Validation of the Marijuana Effect Expectancies Questionnaire (MEEQ) in a non-clinical French-speaking adolescent sample. Psychol Belg 2016; 56(1): 23–41.
Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Transla-tion and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health 2005; 8(2): 94–104.
Lloret Irles D, Morell-Gomis R, Laguía A, Moriano JA. Design and validation of a Cannabis Use Intention Questionnaire (CUIQ) for adolescents. Adicciones 2018; 30(1): 54–65.
Bokan D, Dinić B, Čanković D, Čanković S, Nićiforović-Šurković O, Đurica B. Psychometric properties of the Serbian adaptation of the cannabis use intention questionnaire (CUIQ) among secondary medical school adolescents. J Subst Use 2022; 27(6): 641–7.
Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation mod-eling. J Stat Softw 2012; 48(2): 1–36.
Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covari-ance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new al-ternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999; 6(1): 1–55.
Revelle W. Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research [Internet]. Evanston, Illinois: North-western University; 2020. R package version 2.0.12. [cited 2023, July 1; accessed 2024 Nov 1]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
Shrout PE, Lane SP. Psychometrics. In: Mehl MR, Conner TS, editors. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York: Guilford Press; 2012. pp. 302–20.
Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 1981; 18(1): 39–50.
Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 45/2013, 25/2019. The Law on Patients’ Rights of the Republic of Serbia [Inter-net]. Belgrade: Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia; 2019 [cited 2024 May 14; accessed 2024 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.paragraf.rs/propisi/zakon_o_pravima_pacijenata.html
Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: A prac-tical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol 2014; 105(3): 399–412.
Harman HH. Modern Factor Analysis. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1976. p. 487.