Psihosocijalne karakteristike i motivacioni faktori kod žena koje žele estetsko uvećanje grudi
Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. Postoje različita mišljenja o činiocima koji motivišu žene da se podvrgnu operaciji uvećanja grudi. Cilj ove studije bio je da se procene motivi za operaciju uvećanja grudi, nivo samopouzdanja kod tih pacijentkinja i lični doživljaj sopstvene slike tela. Metode. Ova prospektivna studija obuhvatila je pacijentkinje kojima je urađena augmentaciona mamoplastika (grupa AM) u Kliničkom centru Vojvodine u toku tri godine. Na paket upitnika koji je osmišljen da se procene motivi za operaciju, nivo samopouzdanja i lični doživljaj slike tela odgovorilo je 45 pacijentkinja. Kontrolnu grupu činile su žene sličnog životnog doba, socijalnog statusa i nivoa obrazovanja koje nisu želele da menjaju veličinu grudi. U istraživanju su korišteni opšti upitnik, Rozenbergov upitnik za procenu samopoštovanja i Photographic Figure Rating Scale (PFRS) test. Rezultati. Nisu utvrđene statistički značajne razlike između dve grupe žena u sociodemografskim varijablama (bračnom statusu, nivou obrazovanja, mestu stanovanja i zaposlenju), ali je utvrđen značajno niži indeks telesne mase (BMI) kod žena koje su želele uvećanje grudi. Najčešće navođeni motivi za operaciju bili su: želja za povećanjem ženstvenosti (82,2%), samopouzdanja (75,5%) i atraktivnosti (73,3%), zatim smanjenje stidljivosti u kontaktu sa muškarcima (64,4%), poboljšanje seksualnih odnosa (46,5%) i smanjeno zadirkivanje zbog izgleda grudi od strane okoline (42,2%), kao i lakše nalaženje partnera (11,1%) i posla (2,2%). Obe grupe pokazale su visok nivo samopouzdanja, ali su dobijene vrednosti testa bile značajno niže u grupi AM. Srednja vrednost dobijena u samoprocenjivanju slike tela po PFRS skali bila je značajno niža u grupi AM nego u kontrolnoj grupi (4,28 ± 1,3 vs 5,12 ± 1,23), što koincidira sa vrednostima BMI. Žene u grupi AM pokazale su statistički značajno niže vrednosti u proceni najmršavije i najdeblje atraktivne figure prema PFRS skali, i imale su uži raspon procene atraktivnosti figura. Zaključak. Preoperativna procena činilaca koji upućuju žene da se odluče za uvećanje grudi treba da pomogne hirurzima da isključe one sa nerealnim očekivanjima i različitim tendencijama ka psihičkim poremećajima.
Reference
The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. !5th an-nual Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics 2011. Available from: http/ /www.surgery.org/media/statistics
Sarwer DB, Pertschuk M J, Wadden, TA, Whitaker LA. Psycho-logical investigations in cosmetic surgery: A look back and a look ahead. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101(4): 1136−42.
Cash TF, Melnyk SE, Hrabosky JI. The assessment of body im-age investment: An extensive revision of the Appearance Schemas Inventory. Int J Eat Disord 2004; 35(3): 305–16.
Sarwer DB, LaRossa D, Bartlett SP, Low DW, Bucky LP, Whitaker LA. Body Image Concerns of Breast Augmentation Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112(1): 83−90.
Henderson-King D, Henderson-King E. Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: Scale development and validation. Body Image: An Int J Res 2005; 2(2): 137−49.
Brown A, Furnham A, Glanville L, Swami V. Factors that affect the likelihood of undergoing cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2007; 27(5): 501–8.
Rubin LR, Klassen A, Cano SJ, Pusic AL. Motivations for breast surgery: a quantitative comparison study of breast reconstruction, augmentation and reduction patients. Breast J 2009; 15(6) 666−7.
Crerand CE, Infield AL, Sarwer DB. Psychological considera-tions in cosmetic breast augmentation. Plast Surg Nurs 2007; 27(3): 146−54.
Solvi AS, Foss K, von Soest T, Roald HE, Skolleborg KC, Holte A. Motivational factors and psychological processes in cosmetic breast augmentation surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63(4): 673−80.
Bazner J. Attitudes About Cosmetic Surgery: Gender and Body Experience. GVSU McNair Scholars J 2002; 6(1): 11−6.
Alagoz MS, Basrerzi AD, Uysal AC, Tüzer V, Unlü RE, Sensöz O, et al. The Psychiatric View of Patients of Aesthetic Surgery: Self-Esteem, Body Image and Eating Attitude. Aesth Plast Surg 2003; 27(5): 345−8.
Sarwer DB. Psychological consideration in cosmetic surgery. In: Glodwyn RM, Cohen MN, editors. The Unfavorable Result in Plastic Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia. Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 14−23.
Crerand CE, Franklin ME, Sarwer DB. Body dysmorphic dis-order and cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118(7): 167e−80e.
Kellett S, Clarke S, McGill P. Outcome from psychological as-sessment regarding recommendation for cosmetic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61(5): 512−7.
Borah G, Rankin M, Wey P. Psychological complication in 281 plastic surgery practices. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104(5): 1241−9.
Swami V, Salem N, Furnham A, Tovee MJ. Initial examination of the validity and reliability of the female photographic figure rating scale for body image assessment. Personal Individ Dif-feren 2008; 44: 1752−61.
Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Revised ed. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1989.
Bruck JC, Klenschmidt A, Ottomann C. Invreased self-confidence and decreased sexual discomfort after subpectoral mammap-lasty. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2011; 43(2): 112−8. (German)
Mazzocchi M, Dessi LA, Iodice P, Saggini R, Scuderi N. A study of postural changes after breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36(3): 570−7.
McGregor FC. Social, psychological and cultural dimensions of cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery. Aesth Plast Surg 1989; 13(1): 1−8.
Simis KJ, Verhulst FC, Koot HM. Body image, psychosocial functional, and personality: How different are adolescents and young adults applying for plastic surgery? J Child Psychol Psy-chiatry 2001; 42(5): 669−78.
Sarwer DB, Crerand CE. Body image and cosmetic medical treatments. Body Image 2004; 1(1): 99−111.
Didie ER, Sarwer DB. Factors that influence the decision to undergo cosmetic breast augmentation surgery. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003; 12(3): 241−53.
Javo IM, Sorlie T. Psychosocial predictors of an interest in cos-metic surgery:a population-based study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124(6): 2142−8.
von Soest T, Kvalem IL, Skolleborg KC, Roald HE. Psycholosocial factors predicting the motivation to undergo cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117(1): 51−62; discussion 63−4.
Honigman R, Phillips KA, Castle DJ. A review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113(4): 1229−37.
Birtchnell S, Whitfield P, Lacey JH. Motivation factors in women requesting augmentation and reduction mammaplasty. J Psy-chosom Res 1990; 34(5): 509−14.
Javo IM, Sorlie T. Psychosocial characteristics of young norwe-gian women interested in liposuction, breast augmentation, rhinoplasty, and abdominoplasty:a population –based study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125(5): 1536−43.
Levine JC, Anderson RC. Preoperative assessment of eating dis-orders in plastic surgery patients. Plast Surg Nurs 2009; 29(1): 60−3.
Burk J, Zelen SL, Terino EO. More than skin deep: a self-consistency approach to the psychology of cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76(2): 270−80.
Ozgur F, Tuncali D Gursu G. Life satisfaction, self-esteem and body image:a psychosocial evaluation of aesthetic an recon-structive surgery candidates. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1998; 22(6): 412−9.
Shim C, Thoma A, McCahe RE, Antony M. Measuring Outcomes in Aesthetic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111(1): 469−80.
Crerand CE, Cash TF, Whitaker LA. Cosmetic surgery of the face. In: Sarwer DB, Pruzinsky T, Cash TF, Goldwyn RM, Persing JA, Whitaker LA, editors. Psychological Aspects of Recon-structive and Cosmetic Plastic Surgery: Empirical, Clinical, and Ethical Issues. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 233−50.
Sarwer DB, Didie ER, Gibbons LM. Cosmetic surgery of the body. In: Sarwer DB, Pruzinsky T, Cash TF, Goldwyn RM, Persing JA, Whitaker LA, editors. Psychological Aspects of Reconstructive and Cosmetic Plastic Surgery: Empirical, Clinical, and Ethical Issues. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 251−66.
