Testiranje spojnog smicanja dubokih okluzalnih kompozitnih restauracija postavljenih preko podloge od Dycal, Dycal LC, konvencionalnog ili smolom modifikovanog glas-jonomer cementa

  • Vera Stojanovska Department of Cariology and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sts. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia
  • Chris S Ivanoff Department of Bioscience Research College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA
  • Ilijana Muratovska Department of Cariology and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sts. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia
  • Lidija Popovska Department of Cariology and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sts. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia
  • Franklin Garcia-Godoy Department of Bioscience Research College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA
  • Timothy L. Hottel Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA
  • Dejan LJ. Marković Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Brian Morrow Department of Bioscience Research College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP150816226S
Ključne reči: biomechanics||, ||biomehanika, dentin-bonding agents||, ||dentin, vezivna sredstva, adhesives||, ||adhezivi, dental cements||, ||zub, cement, calcium hydroxide||, ||kalcijum hidroksid, materials testing||, ||materijali, testiranje, in vitro||, ||in vitro,

Sažetak


Uvod/Cilj. Trajnost zubnih nadoknada može se donekle predvideti vstom adhezivne sposobnosti materijala i može se meriti testiranjem snage adhezije restorativnih materijala i zubnih struktura. Cilj ove studije bio je da se da se testira preklapanje spoja koji povezuje zub i biomehaničku jedinicu i da se uporedi jačina veze okluzalnih kompozitnih ispuna postavljenih u duboke kavitete preko podloge od Dycal, Dycal LC, konvencionalnog ili smolom-modifikovanog glas-jonomer cementa. Metode. Ukupno 150 standardizovanih okluzalnih kaviteta bilo je podeljeno u pet grupa (n = 30): I – kaviteti premazani adhezivom (ExciTE®F) i direktno ispunjeni kompozitom (TetricEvoCeram); II i III – kaviteti  sa podlogom od Dycal ili Dycal LC pre postavljanja kompozitnog materijala; IV i V – uzorci sa bazom od Fuji IX ili Fuji II LC (n = 30). Jačina vezivne snage određena je pomoću univerzalne mašine, a način neuspeha (adhezivna, kohezivna, mešovita fraktura) određen je stereomikroskopom. Srednje vrednosti su analizirane pomoću ANOVA testa (p < 0,05), a značajnost razlika između grupa analizirana je Student-ovim t-testom. Rezultati. Jačina vezivne snage (MPa) kompozitnih ispuna u kavitetima bez podloge (23,91 ± 4,54) bila je veća u poređenju sa ispunima postavljenim preko Fuji II LC (17,45 ± 2,74), Fuji IX (8,76 ± 2,57), Dycal LC (13,07 ± 1,84) ili Dycal (6.12 ± 1.28). Zaključak. Smicanje ili pomaknuće okluzalnih kompozitnih ispuna u dubokim kavitetima bez lajnera je veće nego u kavitetima postavljenim preko Fuji II LC > Fuji IX > Dycal LC > Dycal.

Reference

Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Shankar YR, Ravikumar P. Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review. Part I. J Conserv Dent 2014; 17(4): 305−11.

Sudsangiam S, Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1(1): 57−67.

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28(3): 215−35.

Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary ad-hesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Ma-ter 2005; 21(9): 864−81.

Dental materials: Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. ISO/TS 11405:2003 [published on 2003 February 1]. Available from: www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber...

Heintz SD. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between la-boratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9 Suppl 1: 77−106.

Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010; 26(2): e100−21.

Salz U, Bock T. Testing adhesion of direct restoratives to den-tal hard tissue - a review. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12(5): 343−71.

Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA. Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of "macro" test methods. Dent Ma-ter 2010; 26(2): e38−49.

De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek G. Testing bond strength. A review of the literature. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e139−40.

Leloup G, Hoore DW, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J. Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res 2001; 80(7): 1605−14.

DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent Mater 1995; 11(2): 126−31.

Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of "micro" bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 2010; 26(2): e50−62.

Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989; 17(2): 61−7.

Foong J, Lee K, Nguyen C, Tang G, Austin D, Ch'ng C, et al. Com-parison of microshear bond strengths of four self-etching bonding systems to enamel using two test methods. Aust Dent J 2006; 51(3): 252−7.

Sinhoreti MA, Consani S, De Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Knowles JC. Influence of loading types on the shear strength of the dentin-resin interface bonding. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001; 12(1): 39−44.

Pecora N, Yaman P, Dennison J, Herrero A. Comparison of shear bond strength relative to two testing devices. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88(5): 511−5.

Placido E, Meira JB, Lima RG, Muench A, Souza RM, Ballester RY. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: A finite element stress analysis. Dent Mater 2007; 23(9): 1086−92.

McDonough WG, Antonucci JM, He J, Shimada Y, Chiang MY, Schumacher GE, et al. A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin-polymer interfaces. Biomaterials 2002; 23(17): 3603−8.

Van Meerbeek B, Peumans B, Poitevin M, Mine A, Van A, Ende A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010; 26(2): e100−21.

Tedesco TK, Garcia EJ, Maxnuck Soares FZ, de Oliveira Rocha R, Grande RH. Effect of two microsheartest devices on bond strength and fracture pattern in primary teeth. Braz Dent J 2013; 24(6): 605−9.

Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength: evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994; 10(4): 236−40.

Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1998; 14(3): 212−21.

Abreu CW, Santos JF, Passos SP, Michida SM, Takahashi FE, Bot-tino MA. The influence of cutting speed and cutting initiation location in specimen preparation for the microtensile bond strength test. J Adhes Dent 2011; 13(3): 221−6.

Raposo LH, Armstrong SR, Maia RR, Qian F, Geraldeli S, Soares CJ. Effect of specimen gripping device, geometry and fixation method on microtensile bond strength, failure mode and stress distribution: laboratory and finite element analyses. Dent Mater 2012; 28(5): e50−62.

Nujella BP, Choudary MT, Reddy SP, Kumar MK, Gopal T. Com-parison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative mate-rials. Contemp Clin Dent 2012; 3(1): 22−6.

Allanigue CM, Rapp R, Piesco NP, Elliott MA, Nirschl RF, Guevara PA, et al. Adaptation of composite resin restorative materials to retentive grooves of Class I cavity preparations. Pediatr Dent 1986; 8(3): 147−52.

Braz R, Sinhoreti MA, Spazzin AO, Loretto SC, Lyra AM, Meira-Júnior AD. Shear bond strength test using different loading conditions: A finite element analysis. Braz J Oral Sci 2010; 9(4): 439−42.

Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1. Am J Dent 2002; 15(3): 198−210.

Schuurs AH, Gruythuysen RJ, Wesselink PR. Pulp capping with adhesive resin-based composite vs. calcium hydroxide: A re-view. Endod Dent Traumat 2000; 16(6): 240−50.

Stojanovska V, Stevanović M, Mitić A. In vitro comparison of shear bond strength of two resin composites to enamel and dentine using Excite as an adhesive. Acta Stomatol Naissi 2005; 21(50): 429−36. (Serbian)

Khatri A, Nandlal B, Srilatha M. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of conventional composite resin and na-nocomposite resin to sandblasted primary anterior stainless steel crown. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007; 25: 282−5.

Dominguez MS, Witherspoon DE, Gutmann JL, Opperman LA. Histological and Scanning Electron Microscopy Assessment of Various Vital Pulp-Therapy Materials. J Endod 2003; 29(5): 324−33.

Bona AD, Pinzetta C, Rosa V. Effect of acid etching of glass io-nomer cement surface on the microleakage of sandwich resto-rations. J Oral Sci 2007; 15(3): 230−4.

El-Askay FM, Nassif MS, Andrade AM, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effect of surface area and air drying distance on shear strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26: 418−23.

Khoroushi M, Rafiei E. Effect of thermocycling and water sto-rage on bond longevity of two self-etch adhesives. Gen Dent 2013; 61(3): 39−44.

Burger KM, Cooley RL, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of thermocycling times on dentin bond strength. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4(6): 197−8.

Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Koliniotou-Kubia E, Dionyssopoulos P. The effect of thermal cycling on the bovine dentine shear bond strength of current adhesive systems. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31(9): 911−7.

Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of thermal cycling on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent 1998; 11(3): 118−22.

Siqueira JF, Rocas IN, Abad EC, Castro AJ, Gahyva SM, Favieri A. Ability of three root-end filling materials to prevent bacteria leakage. J Endod 2001; 27(11): 673−5.

Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3(2): 185−94.

Davidson Cl, de Gee AJ, Fielzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization con-traction stress. J Dent Res 1983; 63(12): 1396−9.

Munksgaard EC, Irie M, Asmussen E. Dentin-polymer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 1985; 64(12): 1409−11.

von Fraunhofer JA, Marshall KR, Holman BG. The effect of base ⁄ liner use on restoration leakage. Gen Dent 2006; 54(2): 106−9.

Murray PE, García-Godoy F. The incidence of pulp healing de-fects with direct capping materials. Am J Dent 2006; 19(3): 171−7. 46.

Dickens SH, Kelly SR, Flaim GM, Giuseppetti AA. Dentin adhe-sion and microleakage of a resin-based calcium phosphate pulp capping and basing cement. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112(5): 452−7.

Triana R, Prado C, Garro J, García-Godoy F. Dentin bond strength of fluoride-releasing materials. Am J Dent 1994; 7(5): 252−4.

Bell R, Barkmeier WW. Glass-ionomer restoratives and liners: Shear bond strength to dentine. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6(3): 129−34.

Fortin D, Vargas MA, Swift EJ. Bonding of resin composites to resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1995; 8(4): 201−4.

Lin A, Mcintyre NS, Davidson RD. Studies on adhesion of glass-ionomer cement to dentin. J Dent Res 1992; 71(11): 1936−41.

Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9(5): 469−75.

Goracci G, Mori G. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin and calcium hydroxide-dentin interface with resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 1996; 27(2): 129−35.

Estrela C, Holland R. Calcium hydroxide: Study based on scien-tific evidences. J Appl Oral Sci 2003; 11(4): 269−82.

Cheung G. An in vitro evaluation of five dentinal adhesives in posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 1990; 21(6): 513−6.

Objavljeno
2017/07/05
Broj časopisa
Vol. 74 Br. 5 (2017)
Rubrika
Originalni članak