Zadovoljstvo pacijenata izgledom prednjih gornjih zuba

  • Vlatka Lajnert University of Rijeka, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthodontic, Rijeka, Croatia
  • Daniela Kovačević Pavičić University of Rijeka, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthodontic, Rijeka, Croatia
  • Hrvoje Pezo Private Dental Practice, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Aleksandra Stevanović University of Rijeka, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Rijeka, Croatia
  • Tatjana Jović University of Rijeka, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthodontic, Rijeka, Croatia
  • Damir Šnjarić Private Dental Practice, Rijeka, Croatia
  • Edin Muhić Private Dental Practice, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Ključne reči: esthetics, dental||, ||estetika, stomatološka, patient satisfaction||, ||bolesnik, zadovoljstvo, surveys and questionnaires||, ||ankete i upitnici, age factors||, ||životno doba, faktor, dental plaque||, ||zub, plak, dental restoration, permanent||, trajni ispuni,

Sažetak


Uvod/Cilj. Izgled zuba igra važnu ulogu u praktički svim kontaktima jedne osobe. Glavni faktori koji definišu izgled zuba su boja, oblik i pozicija zuba, kvalitet restauracije i položaj zuba u zubnom luku, posebno u prednjem delu. Cilj ovog rada bio je da se utvrdi uticaj životnog doba, pola, frakture zuba i plak indeksa na zadovoljstvo pacijenta izgledom zuba. Metode. U istraživanju je učestvovalo 700 ispitanika u životnom dobu 18–86 godina (medijana 45 godina). Istraživanje je bilo bazirano na  kliničkom pregledu i ispunjavanju upitnika koji je uključivao pitanja bazirana na samoproceni zadovoljstva izgledom gornjih prednjih zuba. Rezultati. Regresijska analiza je pokazala da dentalni plak, frakture zuba, kompozitni ispuni i krunice imaju statistički značajan uticaj i da su negativni prediktori zadovoljstva izgledom zuba. Ispitanici s plakom na gornjim prednjim zubima (p < 0,001), frakturom (p = 0,005), kompozitnim ispunima (p < 0,001) i krunicama (p = 0,032) bili su manje zadovoljni od ispitanika bez njih. Model objašnjava 12% varijanse generalnog zadovoljstva izgledom gornjih prednjih zuba (p < 0,001) kao i najveći učinak imaju kompozitni ispuni (5,3%) i plak (3,2%). Oblik zuba, životno doba i pol nisu bili značajni prediktori zadovoljstva. Zaključak. Zadovoljstvo izgledom zuba je pod uticajem mnogih faktora, a negativan uticaj imaju prisustvo zubnog plaka, fraktura, kompozitnih ispuna i krunica.

 

Reference

Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Geiger SB, Levin L. Patients' satisfac-tion with dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138(6): 805−8.

Beltran-Aguilar E, Barker LK, Canto M, Dye BA, Gooch BF, Griffin SO, et al. Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis-United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2002. MMWR Surveill Summ 2005; 54(3): 1−43.

Carlsson GE, Johansson A, Johansson AK, Ordell S, Ekbäck G, Unell L. Attitudes toward dental appearance in 50- and 60-Year-old subjects living in Sweden. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008; 20(1): 46−55; discussion 56.

Zagar M, Knezović ZD. Influence of esthetic dental and facial measurements on the Caucasian patients' satisfaction. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011; 23(1): 12−20.

Vallittu PK, Vallittu AS, Lassila VP. Dental aesthetics: A survey of attitudes in different groups of patients. J Dent 1996; 24(5): 335−8.

Qualtrough AJ, Burke FJ. A look at dental esthetics. Quintes-sence Int 1994; 25(1): 7−14.

Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC Oral Health 2011; 11: 6.

Wolfart S, Quaas AC, Freitag S, Kropp P, Gerber W, Kern M. Sub-jective and objective perception of upper incisors. J Oral Re-habil 2006; 33(7): 489−95.

Mehl CJ, Harder S, Kern M, Wolfart S. Patients' and dentists' per-ception of dental appearance. Clin Oral Invest 2011; 15(2): 193−9.

Donitza A. Creating the perfect smile: Prosthetic considerations and procedures for optimal dentofacial esthetics. J Calif Dent Assoc 2008; 36(5): 335−40.

Magne P, Gallucci GO, Belser UC. Anatomic crown width/length ratios of unworn and worn maxillary teeth in white subjects. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89(5): 453−61.

Alkhatib MN, Holt R, Bedi R. Age and perception of dental ap-pearance and tooth colour. Gerodontology 2005; 22(1): 32−6.

Xiao J, Zhou XD, Zhu WC, Zhang B, Li JY, Xu X. The preva-lence of tooth discolouration and the self-satisfaction with tooth colour in a Chinese urban population. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34(5): 351−60.

Kershaw S, Newton JT, Williams DM. The influence of tooth co-lour on the perceptions of personal characteristics among fe-male dental patients: Comparisons of unmodified, decayed and 'whitened' teeth. Br Dent J 2008; 204(5): 9−7; discussion 256−7.

Akarslan Z, Sadik B, Erten H, Karabulut E. Dental esthetic satis-faction, received and desired dental treatments for improve-ment of esthetics. Ind J Dent Res 2009; 20(2): 195−200.

Al-Omiri MK, Karasneh JA, Lynch E, Lamey P, Clifford TJ. Im-pacts of missing upper anterior teeth on daily living. Int Dent J 2009; 59(3): 127−32.

Gerritsen A, Sarita P, Witter D, Kreulen C, Mulder J, Creugers N. Esthetic perception of missing teeth among a group of Tanza-nian adults. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21(2): 169−73.

Baubiniene D, Sidlauskas A, Miseviciene I. The need for orthodon-tic treatment among 10-11- and 14-15-year-old Lithuanian schoolchildren. Medicina (Kaunas) 2009; 45(10): 814−21.

Sharma JN. Epidemiology of malocclusions and assessment of orthodontic treatment need for the population of eastern Nepal. World J Orthod 2009; 10(4): 311−6.

Kiyak AH. Does orthodontic treatment affect patients' quality of life. J Dent Educ 2008; 72(8): 886−94.

Thangavelu A, Elavarasu S, Jayapalan P. Pink esthetics in peri-odontics - Gingival depigmentation: A case series. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012; 4(Suppl 2): 186−90.

O´ Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol 1972; 43(1): 38.

Mizrahi B. Visualization before finalization: a predictable pro-cedure for porcelain laminate veneers. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005; 17(8): 513−8; quiz 520, 566.

Al-Habahbeh R, Al-Shammout R, Al-Jabrah O, Al-Omari F. The effect of gender on tooth and gingival display in the anterior region at rest and during smiling. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009; 4(4): 382−95.

Odioso LL, Gibb RD, Gerlach RW. Impact of demographic, be-havioral, and dental care utilization parameters on tooth color and personal satisfaction. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl 2000; (29): S35−41; quiz S43.

Devoto W, Saracinelli M, Manauta J. Composite in everyday prac-tice: How to choose the right material and simplify application techniques in the anterior teeth. Eur J Esthet Dent 2010; 5(1): 102−24.

Nowakovska-Socha J. Aestetic dental treatment in present socio-economic conditions and its influence on the oral hygiene and self-esteem of patients based on the survey and clinical re-search. Ann Acad Med Stetin 2007; 53(2): 100−13. (Polish)

Al-Jaf VM. Relations between dental plaque, gingivitis & dental caries among 21-50 years dental patients. J Bagh Coll Den-tistry 2006; 18(1): 71−4.

Heravi F, Rashed R, Abachizadeh H. Esthetic preferences for the shape of anterior teeth in a posed smile. Am J Orthod Dentof Orthop 2011; 139(6): 806−14.

Fradeani M. Esthetic rehabilitation in fixed prosthodontics. Chicago; Quintessence; Publiching Co Inc. 2004

Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists' preferences of an-terior tooth proportion: A web-based study. J Prosthodont 2000; 9(3): 123−36.

Objavljeno
2017/07/07
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Originalni članak