Organizaciona identifikacija, predanost i orijentacije profesionalnih vojnih lica

  • Dušan Todorović University of Niš, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Niš, Serbia
  • Milanko Dmitrov Čabarkapa University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Milica Tošić-Radev University of Niš, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Niš, Serbia
  • Ines Miladinović Serbian Armed Forces, ‡Special Brigade, Belgrade, Serbia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP160616365T
Ključne reči: military personnel||, ||vojni kolektiv, psychology, military||, ||psihologija, vojna, administrative personnel||, ||kadar, administrativni, organization and administration||, ||organizacija i rukovođenje, surveys and questionnaires||, ||ankete i upitnici, psychology||, job satisfaction||, ||posao, zadovoljstvo,

Sažetak


Uvod/Cilj. Sve vojne organizacije traže takve zaposlene koji će se zalagati za misiju organizacije i delovati odgovorno u smeru postizanja ciljeva operativnih i radnih grupa kojima pripadaju. U skladu s tim, primarni zadatak menadžmenta vojnih organizacija nije samo formiranje pripadnika koji bi bili posvećeni organizaciji već i oficira i vojnika koji se identifikuju sa organizacionom misijom. Cilj istraživanja bio je da se ispita postojanje razlika u organizacionoj identifikaciji, predanosti organizaciji i organizacionim orijentacijama kod profesionalnih vojnih lica i lica zaposlenih u uslužnim i administrativnim delatnostima. Metode. Uzorak istraživanja činilo je ukupno 450 ispitanika – 150 profesionalnih pripadnika vojske, 150 zaposlenih u civilnom sektoru na uslužnim poslovima i 150 zaposlenih u civilnom sektoru na administrativnim poslovima. Za statističku obradu podataka korišćene su analiza varijanse i kanonička diskriminativna analiza. Rezultati. Profesionalna vojna lica odlikovao je visok stepen kako organizacione predanosti tako i organizacione identifikacije u poređenju sa zaposlenima u civilnom sektoru na uslužnim i administrativnim delatnostima. Kroz postupak kanoničke diskriminacione analize utvrđeno je da je profesionalna vojna lica od ostalih razlikovao visok stepen doživljaja sličnosti sa kolegama i visok stepen lojalnosti vojnoj organizaciji, kao ključnim aspektima organizacione identifikacije. Uz to, profesionalna vojna lica imala su izraženiju afektivnu privrženost organizaciji. Zaključak. Ljudski resursi predstavljaju ključ i glavni faktor konkurentske prednosti u kontekstu snažne konkurentnosti na polju vojno-odbrambene realnosti. S obzirom na to da su oni adaptibilniji i fleksibilniji, u poređenju sa tehnološko-strukturalnim resursima, visok stepen doživljaja sličnosti sa ostalim pripadnicima organizacije, izražena lojalnost i afektivna predanost organizaciji, u dobroj meri garantuju nove uspehe i napredak vojne organizacije.

Reference

Lojić R. Career planning and development. Vojno Delo 2009; 2: 171‒96.

Mael FA, Ashforth BE. Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification and turnover amog newcomers. Pers Psychol 1995; 48(2): 309‒33.

Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail CV. Organizational images and member identification. Admin Sci Quart 1994; 39(2): 239‒63.

Alessandri SW. Modeling corporate identity: a concept explication and theoretical explanation. Corp Commun Int J 2001; 6(4): 173‒82.

Hatch MJ, Schultz M. Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. Eur J Market 1997; 31(5‒6): 356‒65.

Hatch MJ, Schultz M. The dynamics of organizational identity. Hum Relat 2002; 55(8): 989‒1018.

Hatch MJ, Schultz M. Bringing the corporation into corporate branding. Eur J Market 2003; 37(7‒8): 1041‒64.

Pruzan P. Corporate reputation: image and identity. Corp Reput Rev 2001; 4(1): 50‒64.

Stuart H. Employee identification with the corporate identity: Issues and implications. Int Stud Manage Organ 2002; 32(3): 28‒44.

Ashforth BE, Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad Manage Rev 1989; 14(1): 20‒39.

Brown M. Identification and some conditions of organizational involvement. Admin Sci Quart 1969; 14(3): 346‒55.

Hall DT, Schneider B, Nygren HT. Personal factors in organizational identification. Admin Sci Quart 1970; 15: 176‒89.

O'Reilly III CA, Chatman J. Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. J Appl Psychol 1986; 71(3): 492‒9.

Patchen M. Participation, achievement and involvement on the job. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1970.

Taylor DM, Moghaddam FM. Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives. New York: Praeger; 1987.

Mrmak I. Fundamentals of Military Psychology. Belgrade: Center for Andrago Psychological and Sociological Research in the JNA; 1973. (Serbian)

Dedić G. Soldier's social adaptation during the military service. Vojnosanit Pregl 2004; 61(6): 637‒43. (Serbian)

Dunham RB, Grupe JA, Casteneda MB. Ortanizatioanl commitment: the utility of an integrative definition. J Appl Psychol 1994; 79(3): 370‒80.

Mathieu J, Zajac DM. A review and meta-analyiss of the antecedents, vorrelates and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychol Bull 1990; 108(2): 171‒94.

Cheney G. On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Commun Monogr 1983; 50(4): 342‒62.

Cheney G. The rhetoric of identificaion and the study of organizational communication. Quart J Speech 1983; 69(2): 143‒58.

Tompkins PK, Cheney G. Account analysis of organizations: Decision-making and identification. In: Putnam L, Pacanowsky M, editors. Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1983. p. 123‒46.

Tompkins PK, Cheney G. Communication and unobtrusive control in contemporary organizations. In: McPhee RD, Tompkins PK, editors. Organizational communicattion: Traditional themes and new directions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1985. p. 179‒210.

Barker JR, Tompkins PK. Identification in the self - managing organization: Characteristics of target and tenure. Hum Commun Res 1994; 21: 247–264.

Simon HA. Administrative behavior, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press; 1976.

Mael FA, Alderks CE. Leadership team cohesion and subordinate work unit morale and performance. Mil Psychol 1993; 5: 141‒58.

Little W, Fowler HW, Coulson J, Onions CT. The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary On Historical Principles. London: Oxford University Press; 1959.

Wilkes G, Krebs W. The Collins Concise Dictionary of the English Language. 2nd ed. London: William Collins & Sons; 1988.

Allen NJ, Meyer JP. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J Occup Psychol 1990; 63(1): 1‒18.

Allen NJ, Meyer JP. Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. J Vocat Behav 1996; 49(3): 252‒76.

Meyer JP, Allen NJ. A three-componet conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum Resour Manag Rev 1991; 1(1): 61‒89.

Beck K, Wilson C. Development of an affective organizational commitment: A cross-sequential examination of change with tenure. J Vocat Behav 2000; 56(1): 114‒36.

Metcalfe B, Dick G. Exploring Organisation Commitment in the Police: Implications for Human Resource Strategy. Policing 2001; 24(3): 399‒419.

Mowday R, Porter L, Steers R. Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1982.

Bojanović R. Psychology of human relations. Belgrade: Nolit; 1979. (Serbian)

Papa JM, Daniels DT, Spiker BK. Organizational Communication perspectives and trends. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2008.

Presthus RV. Toward a theory of organizational behavior. Admin Sci Quart 1958; 3(1): 48‒72.

McCroskey JC, Richmond VP, Johnson AD, Smith HT. Organizational orientations theory and measurement: Development of measures and preliminary investigations. Commun Quart 2004; 52(1): 1‒14.

Objavljeno
2017/09/19
Broj časopisa
Vol. 74 Br. 9 (2017)
Rubrika
Originalni članak