Museum in Crisis: The Past on Sale
Abstract
The paper focuses on the critical analysis of structural and value deficiencies of the museum scene in Serbia evident in the transfer of the elements of strategic and legislation documents when applied to practical solutions. The position from which the deficiencies are observed is in the current ICOM Strategic plan and its motto “Independence, integrity, professionalism”. These three components of museum work represent the backbone of the musealisation process if it is considered as an activity of museum experts. The paper is structured in the way that follows strategic and legislation documents that are partially or in full considering the museum work in Serbia, and particularly in the segments of decision making. Deficiencies are vertically deliberated—from the concepts in (unacknowledged) the Strategy of Culture Development in Serbia, via in effect the Act on Culture and the Act on Museums to the resulted system of governance and management and, finally, insufficiently developed system of valorisation of basic museum expertise and professional promotion. Through these instances one can observe limitations and inabilities of this socially responsible activity—care for collective memory—to reach its full estimated potential. The reason is easier to verbalize then to argue—almost complete political influence on governance and management of museum institutions followed by incompetence and/or lack of (political) will of decision makers to structure the filed according to contemporary principals of the profession.
References
Закон о култури, Службени гласник РС, бр. 72 од 3. септембра 2009, бр. 13 од 19. фебруара 2016, бр. 30 од 23. марта 2016 – исп., бр. 6 од 24. јануара 2020, бр. 47 од 10. маја 2021, бр. 78 од 3. августа 2021.
Закон о музејима, Службени гласник НРС, 29. јануар 1951, бр. 4, стр. 88–92.
Крстовић, Н. (2022). Девет живота кустоса: Од музеологије до музеографије. Београд: Филозофски факултет – Центар за музеологију и херитоилогију.
Стратегија развоја културе Републике Србије од 2020. до 2029. године.
Adams, G. K. (2018). ICOM Warns Against Threats to Museum Independence. New Statement Issued on Importance of Museum Autonomy (Museum Association, April 18. https://www.museumsassociation.org/museums-journal/news/2018/04/18042018-icom-warns-threats-museum-independence/# (6. 3. 2022)
Banković, A. (2017). Cultural Policy and Formation of the Museum Network in Federal People`s Republic of Yugoslavia. Example Belgrade. Discussing Heritage and Museums: Crossing Paths of France and Serbia, Choice of Articles from the Summer School of Museology Proceedings, Paris, Website of HiCSA, 7, 130–146.
Brulon Soares, B. (2021). The Myths of Museology: On Deconstructing, Reconstructing, and Redistributing, ICOFOM Study Series [Online], 49(2), 243–260.
Edson, G. & Dean, D. (1996). The Handbook for Museums. London – New York: Routledge.
Eriksen, T. H. (2001). Between Universalism and Relativism: A Critique of the UNESCO Concepts of Culture. In: J. Cowan, M. Bénéicte Dembour, R. Wilson (Eds.), Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives (127–148). Cambridge: University Press.
Hofstede, G. (2010). Six Dimensions of National Culture, https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national-culture (14. 4. 2022)
Horjan, G. (Ed.) (2022). Museum Watch Governance Project. Paris: ICOM.
ICOM (2016). ICOM Strategic Plan 2016–2022.
ICOM (2020). Statement on Independence of the Museums.
ICOM Srbija (2020). Zvanično saopštenje NK ICOM Srbija povodom postavljenja v. d. direktora MSUB.
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (1995). Theorizing Heritage. Ethnomusicology, 39(3), 367–380.
Krstović, N. (2018). Autonomija za muzeje. Časopis Nacionalnog komiteta ICOM Srbija, 8, 9–10.
Krstović, N. (2020a). Colonizing Knowledge: New Museology as Museology of News. Prace Etnograficzne: Revisiting new museology, 48(2), 125–139.
Krstović, N. (2020b). Preisipitivanje međusobnih odnosa: „Prošireni“ muzej i savremena umetnost. Zbornik Seminara za studije moderne umetnosti, 16, 133–146.
Lowenthal, D. (1998). The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. Cambridge: University Press.
Martinović, I. i Miličić, D. (2013). Muzejski predmet: jedan od ključnih koncepata muzeologije. Knjižničarstvo: Glasnik Društva knjižničara Slavonije i Baranje, 17 (1), 131–151.
Mattila, M. (Ed.) (2018). The Museum Policy Programme 2030 of the Ministry of Education and Culture: Museums of Opportunities. Helsinki: Publications of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland.
Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking: The Rhetoric of Modernity, Logic of Coloniality, Grammar of Decoloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 449–514.
Mihajlović, T. (2021). #Staro: Stare prakse, stare navike, Časopis NK ICOM Srbija, 14, 26–27.
Pérez de Cuéllar, J. (1998). Our Creative Diversity: Report of the World Commission on Culture and Development. Paris: UNESCO.
Peterson, J. (2021). #shorts: You can Politicize Everything but not Everything is Political, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnrWR5OpomE (22. 6. 2022)
Pravilnik o stručnim muzejskim zvanjima i drugim zvanjima u muzejskoj djelatnosti te uvjetima i načinu njihova stjecanja (2019). NN 104/2019 (30. 10. 2019)
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. Routledge.
Šola, T. (2003). Kako sagraditi uspješan muzej, ili pledoaje za zajedništvo. Informatica museologica, 34 (3–4), 74–80.
UNESCO (2005). The Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. Paris: UNESCO.
Wa Thiong’o, N. (1987). Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House.
The details about the publication policy, including copyright and licensing, are available at: