Initial Steps in Developing Critical Thinking by Teaching Philosophy: Scandalon and Rationalization
Abstract
This paper discusses creating and maintaining certain predispositions for the development of critical thinking as one of the key goals in teaching philosophy. By starting with definitions and recommendations of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development related to the goals of teaching philosophy, in this paper we provide a few suggestions for reaching these goals more effectively. We propose a general structural framework from which their realization can be accessed, with scandalon and rationalization as its first two elements. From that perspective, we stress the significance of plasticity and immaturity, as well as some ways to engage them in students. The paper also includes some specific aspects of critical thinking from the viewpoint of logical and methodological literacy. In order to better understand our point, the theoretical framework is backed with a few examples from the classroom. In the conclusion, we point out that these are only the beginning steps in developing critical thinking and that steps like testing and checking are also necessary for fully reaching this goal.
References
Bowell, T., & Kemp, G. (2005). Critical Thinking: A Concise Guide. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203482889
Burnyeat, M. (1990). The Theaetetus of Plato. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Cohen, M., & Nagel, E. (1968). An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. New Delhi: Allied Publishers Limited.
Cottrell, S. (2005). Critical Thinking Skills: Developing Effective Analysis and Argument. Houndmills – New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. Boston – New York – Chicago: D. C. Heath & CO.
Dewey, J. (2001). Democracy and Education. Hazleton, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
Gadamer, H. G. (2006). Truth and Method. London – New York: Continuum.
Goufida, M. (2007). Philosophy: A School of Freedom. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000154173
Hare, W. (1999). Critical thinking as an aim of education. In: R. Marples (Ed.), The Aims of Education (pp. 85–99). London: Routledge.
Hobbes, T. (1992). Of identity and difference. In: W. Molesworth (Ed.), The Collected Works of Thomas Hobbes, Vol. I (pp. 132–138). London: Routledge – Thoemmes Press.
Houtlosser, P. (2001). Points of view. In: F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory (pp. 27–50). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804649
Kienstra, N., Imants, J., Karskens, M., & van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2015). Doing philosophy effectively: Student learning in classroom teaching. PLoS ONE, 10(9), Article e0137590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137590
Kolencik, J. (2013, May 25). Logic is the beginning of wisdom not the end [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4XPTmmvVow
Lam, C.-M. (2007). Is Popper’s falsificationist heuristic a helpful resource for developing critical thinking?. In: M. Mason (Ed.), Critical Thinking and Learning (pp. 93–108). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Locke, J. (1999). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Hazleton: The Pennsylvania State University.
Malabou, C. (2005). The Future of Hegel—Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic. London – New York: Routledge.
Marinković, J. (1983). Metodika nastave filozofije. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
Nikolić, I. (2019). Informal and formal steps in conducting discussions and debates as ways of teaching philosophy. Facta Universitatis, Series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History, 18(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPSPH1903163N
Nikolić, I. (2020). Critical thinking between essentialism and perennialism. Teme – časopis za društvene nauke, XLIV (3), 863–880. https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME190117050N
Peirce, C. S. (1868). Questions concerning certain faculties claimed for man. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2(2), 103–114. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25665643
Petrović, G. (2002). Logika. Novi Sad: Dnevnik.
Plato. (2004). Theaetetus. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Popper, K. (1995). Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.
Riz, V. (2004). Filozofija i religija – istočna i zapadna misao. Rečnik. Beograd: Dereta.
Russell, B. (1926). On Education. London: George Allen & Unwin LTD.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846089
van Eemeren, F. H. (2001). Fallacies. In: F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory (pp. 135–164). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2003). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616389
Герджиков, С. (2019). Методика на философията в училище. Лекции. София: Екстрем.
Јеремић, М. (2016). Филозофија. Уџбеник за четврти разред гимназије и средње стручне школе. Београд: Klett.
Правилник: Правилник о плану и програму наставе и учења за гимназију. (2020). Просветни гласник, 4/2020. Београд: Службени гласник Републике Србије.
Титл, П. (2018). А шта ако… Сабрани мисаони експерименти у филозофији. Београд: Центар за промоцију науке.
The details about the publication policy, including copyright and licensing, are available at: