DSM-5: Преглед методолошког поступка

Vladimir M. Jović

doi:10.5937/zrffp44-6299

Vladimir M. Jović Univerzitet u Prištini sa Privremenim sedištem u Kosovskoj Mitrovici, Filozofski fakultet, Katedra za psihologiju

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/zrffp44-6299

Ključne reči: Biomedical Model||, ||биомедицински модел, psychiatric nozology||, ||психијатријска нозологија, mental disorders||, ||ментални поремећаји, DSM-5||, ||DSM-5,

Sažetak

Савремене класификације менталних поремећаја су послужиле да се психијатрија и психопатологија врате у биомедицински модел. Након више од тридесет година, синдроматски приступ нозографији се доводи у питање са филозофских и методолошких аспеката. Циљ овог рада је да представи методолошки поступак у креирању класификација менталних поремећаја почевши од DSM-III, преко неколико принципа: то је пре свега прокламовани „атеоретски приступ“ класификацији, који је примењиван код креирања критеријума за поремећаје који се називају „операционализованим“, а затим и „номотетски приступ“, који је представљен као једино легитимно средство за доношење закључака о менталним поремећајима. Исход овог методолошког поступка могуће је пратити кроз његове резултате: мере поузданости и валидности нозолошких категорија, као и питања психијатријског коморбидитета, који се види као артефакт методолошког поступка.

Biografija autora

Vladimir M. Jović, Univerzitet u Prištini sa Privremenim sedištem u Kosovskoj Mitrovici, Filozofski fakultet, Katedra za psihologiju

Department of Psychology

Reference

Јовић, В. (2014). Отворена питања психијатријске нозологије: концептуални оквир америчке класификације менталних поремећаја (DSM). Зборник Радова Филозофског Факултета у Приштини, ХLIV(1), 309–333.

Amaducci, L., & Lippi, A. (1994). Risk factors for dementia. In A. Burns & R. Levy (Eds.), Dementia (pp. 129–141). Springer.

American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition,. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Andreasen, N. C. (2007). DSM and the Death of Phenomenology in America: An Example of Unintended Consequences. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33(1), 108–112.

Ash, P. (1949). The reliability of psychiatric diagnoses. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(2), 272–276.

Barglow, P. (2013). “A Rose Is a Rose Is a Rose”? American Journal of Psychiatry, 170(6), 680.

Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. E., & Erbaugh, J. K. (1962). Reliability of psychiatric diagnoses: 2. A study of consistency of clinical judgments and ratings. American Journal of Psychiatry, 119(4), 351–357.

Bermazohn, P. C., Porto, L., Arlow, P. B., Pollack, S., Stronger, R., & Siris, S. G. (2000). At Issue: Hierarchical diagnosis in chronic schizophrenia: A clinical study of co-occurring syndromes. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26(3), 517–525.

Berrios, G. E. (1989). What is phenomenology? A review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 82(7), 425.

Berrios, G. E. (1993). Phenomenology and psychopathology: Was there ever a relationship? Comprehensive Psychiatry, 34(4), 213–220.

Berrios, G. E. (2002). The history of mental symptoms: Descriptive psychopathology since the nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cloninger, C. R. (2002). Implications of comorbidity for the classification of mental disorders: the need for a psychobiology of coherence. In M. Maj, W. Gaebel, J. López-Ibor, & N. Sartorius (Eds.), Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification (pp. 79–105). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Compton, W. & Guze, S. (1995). The neo-Kraepelinian revolution in psychiatric diagnosis. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 245(4-5), 196–201.

Craddock, N., & Owen, M. J. (2005). The beginning of the end for the Kraepelinian dichotomy. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 186(5), 364–366.

Craddock, N., & Owen, M. J. (2010). The Kraepelinian dichotomy - going, going... but still not gone. The British Journal of Psychiatry : The Journal of Mental Science, 196(2), 92–5.

Feest, U. (2005). Operationism in psychology: What the debate is about, what the debate should be about. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41(2), 131–149.

Feighner, J. P., Robins, E., Guze, S. B., Woodruff Jr., R. A., Winokur, G., & Munoz, R. (1972). Diagnostic Criteria for Use in Psychiatric Research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26(1), 57–63.

Feinstein, A. R. (1970). The pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 23(7), 455–468.

Follette, W. C., & Houts, A. C. (1996). Models of scientific progress and the role of theory in taxonomy development: A case study of the DSM.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1120.

Freedman, R., Lewis, D. A., Michels, R., Pine, D. S., Schultz, S. K., Tamminga, C. A., … Oquendo, M. A. (2013). The initial field trials of DSM-5: new blooms and old thorns. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170(1), 1–5.

Grant, D. C., & Harari, E. (2005). Psychoanalysis, science and the seductive theory of Karl Popper. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39(6), 446–452.

Green, C. D. (1992). Of Immortal Mythological Beasts Operationism in Psychology. Theory & Psychology, 2(3), 291–320.

Greenberg, G. (2013). The book of woe: the DSM and the unmaking of psychiatry. New York: Penguin Group (USA) Inc.

Horwitz, A. V, & Wakefield, J. C. (2007). The loss of sadness. Oxford University Press New York.

Horwitz, A. V., & Wakefield, J. C. (2012). All We Have to Fear: Psychiatry’s Transformation of Natural Anxieties into Mental Disorders (p. 320). Oxford University Press, USA.

Hyman, S. E. (2010). The diagnosis of mental disorders: the problem of reification. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155–179.

IGDA Workgroup, W. P. A. (2003). IGDA. 8: Idiographic (personalised) diagnostic formulation. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 182(45), s55–s57.

Insel, T. (2013). Director’s Blog: Transforming Diagnosis. NIMH. Retrieved July 28, 2013, from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/2013/transforming-diagnosis.shtml

Jablensky, A. (2005). Categories, dimensions and prototypes: critical issues for psychiatric classification. Psychopathology, 38(4), 201–205.

Jaspers, K. (1978). Opšta psihopatologija [Allgemeine Psychopathologie] (Vol. Karijatide). Beograd: Prosveta – Savremena administracija.

Kendell, R., & Jablensky, A. (2003). Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry, 160(1), 4–12.

Kendler, K. S. (2005). Toward a philosophical structure for psychiatry. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(3), 433–40. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.433

Kendler, K. S., Muñoz, R. A., & Murphy, G. (2010). The development of the Feighner criteria: a historical perspective. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(2), 134–142.

Kessler, R. C., & Üstün, T. B. (2004). The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13(2), 93–121.

Kessler, R., McGonagle, K., Zhao, S., Nelson, C. B., Hughes, M., Eshleman, S., … Kendler, K. S. (1994). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the united states: Results from the national comorbidity survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51(1), 8–19.

Kraemer, H. C., Kupfer, D. J., Clarke, D. E., Narrow, W. E., & Regier, D. A. (2012). DSM-5: how reliable is reliable enough? The American Journal of Psychiatry, 169(1), 13–5.

Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions - Third Edition. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (2013). Introduction to the conference. In Discovering the Body in the Mind: Researchers and Clinicians in Dialogue (pp. 1–5).

Lieberman, P. B. (1989). “Objective” methods and “subjective” experiences. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 15(2), 267–275.

Luhrmann, T. M. (2000). Of Two Minds: The Growing Disorder in Psychiatry. New York City: Alfred A. Knopf.

Maj, M. (2005). “Psychiatric comorbidity”: an artefact of current diagnostic systems? The British Journal of Psychiatry, 186(3), 182–184. doi:10.1192/bjp.186.3.182

Maj, M. (2011). Psychiatric diagnosis: pros and cons of prototypes vs. operational criteria. World Psychiatry : Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 10(2), 81–2.

Miladinović, T. (2013). Diferencijalno-dijagnostička snaga instrumenta za procenu nivoa razvoja samodiferencijajcije i odnosa sa važnim drugim. Univerzitet u Beogradu.

Momirović, K. (1997). O realnoj egzistenciji psiholoških konstrukata. U: K. Momirović (Ed.), Realnost psiholoških konstrukata (pp. 1–8). Beograd: Institut za psihologiju Filozofski fakultet, Institut za sociološka i kriminološka istraživanja.

Muller, R. J. (2007). Doing psychiatry wrong: A critical and prescriptive look at a faltering profession. Routledge.

Nagel, T. (1994). Freud’s permanent revolution. The New York Review of Books, 12(05).

North, C. S., & Yutzy, S. H. (2010). Goodwin and Guze’s Psychiatric Diagnosis, Sixth Edition. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.

Parnas, J., & Sass, L. A. (2008). Varieties of “Phenomenology”: On Description, Understanding, and Explanation in Psychiatry. In K. S. Kendler & J. Parnas (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry: Explanation, Phenomenology, and Nosology (pp. 239–278). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

Porter, D. (2013). Establishing Normative Validity for Scientific Psychiatric Nosology: The Significance of Integrating Patient Perspectives. In Making the DSM-5 (pp. 63–74). Springer.

Reed, G. M., Mendonça Correia, J., Esparza, P., Saxena, S., & Maj, M. (2011). The WPA-WHO Global Survey of Psychiatrists’ Attitudes Towards Mental Disorders Classification. World Psychiatry : Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 10(2), 118–31.

Regier, D. A., Kaelber, C. T., Rae, D. S., Farmer, M. E., Knauper, B., Kessler, R. C., & Norquist, G. S. (1998). Limitations of diagnostic criteria and assessment instruments for mental disorders: Implications for research and policy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55(2), 109–115.

Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kraemer, H. C., Kuramoto, S. J., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2013). DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, part II: test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170(1), 59–70.

Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2009). The conceptual development of DSM-V. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(6), 645–50.

Regier, D., Myers, J., Kramer, M., & Al, E. (1984). The NIMH epidemiologic catchment area program: Historical context, major objectives, and study population characteristics. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41(10), 934–941.

Robins, E., & Guze, S. B. (1970). Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: Its application to schizophrenia. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 126(7), 983–986.

Robins, L. N. (1994). How Recognizing “Comorbidities” in Psychopathology May Lead to an Improved Research Nosology. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1(1), 93–95.

Shorter, E. (2013). The History of DSM. In J. Paris & J. Phillips (Eds.), Making the DSM-5: Concepts and Controversies (pp. 3–20). New York: Springer.

Smith, G. T., & Combs, J. (2010). Issues of construct validity in psychological diagnoses. Contemporary Directions in Psychopathology: Toward the DSM-V and ICD-11. New York: Guilford.

Solms, M., & Panksepp, J. (2012). The “Id” knows more than the “Ego” admits: Neuropsychoanalytic and primal consciousness perspectives on the interface between affective and cognitive neuroscience. Brain Sciences, 2(2), 147–175.

Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., Robins, E., Kuriansky, J., & Gurland, B. (1975). Preliminary report of the reliability of research diagnostic criteria (RDC) applied to psychiatric case records. Prediction in Psychopharmacology: Preclinical and Clinical Correlates, A. Sudilovsky, S. Gershon, R. Deer, Eds, 231–245.

Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Endicott, J. (2012). Standards for DSM-5 reliability. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169(5), 537.

Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1992). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) I: history, rationale, and description. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49(8), 624–629.

Surtees, P. G., & Kendell, R. E. (1979). The hierarchy model of psychiatric symptomatology: an investigation based on present state examination ratings. The British Journal of Psychiatry , 135 (5 ), 438–443.

Taylor, M. A., & Vaidya, N. A. (2009). Descriptive Psychopathology: The Signs and Symptoms of Behavioral Disorders. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Thornton, T., Fulford, K. (Bill), & Christodoulou, G. (2009). Philosophical Perspectives on Health, Illness and Clinical Judgement in Psychiatry and Medicine. In I. M. Salloum & J. E. Mezzich (Eds.), Psychiatric Diagnosis: Challenges and Prospects (pp. 15–27). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Vaillant, G. E. (1984). The Disadvantages of DSM-III Outweigh Its Advantages. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141(4), 542–545.

Westen, D. (1996). A model and a method for uncovering the nomothetic from the idiographic: An alternative to the Five-Factor Model? Journal of Research in Personality, 30(3), 400–413.

Yun, A. J. (2008). The hegemony of empiricism: the opportunity for theoretical science in medicine. Medical Hypotheses, 70(3), 478–81.

Zipursky, R. B., Reilly, T. J., & Murray, R. M. (2012). The myth of schizophrenia as a progressive brain disease. Schizophrenia Bulletin.