(Non)discriminatory treatment of the cohabitation partners regarding the right to survivor´s pension
Abstract
This paper was inspired by a recent decision of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which establishes the existance of unequal treatment of marital and cohabitation partners regarding the exercise of the right to survivor´s pension, as one of the key property rights deriving from the family union. Such a progressive interpretation comes as a follow-up to an earlier decision of the same Court finding discrimination of cohabitation partners in comparison to spouses with respect to inheritance rights. The authors of the paper agree with the conclusions of the Constitutional Court of BiH in both of these decisions, but partly for other reasons, which is why they consider it important to supplement the argumentation and reasoning used in said decisions. The paper therefore first outlines trends in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, followed by an analysis of relevant legislation in BiH, in order to examine, within the discrimination test, whether the BiH legislature has adequately used the discretionary space to create and implement public social security policies, and whether, based on the entire legal regime set up for the cohabitation union, it created legitimate (justifiable) expectations for the extramarital partners (bona fide) that their de facto extra-marital cohabitation is equalized in property effects with the marital community.
References
Barlow, A. (2014). Legislating for Cohabitation in Common law Jurisdictions in Europe: Two Steps Forward and One Step Back? K. Boele-Woelki, N. Dethloff i W. Gephart (Prir.), Family Law and Culture in Europe: Developments, Challenges and Opportunities (77-94). Intersentia.
Bitiukova, V. (2014). Vallianatos and Others vs. Greece: What is in there for Lithuania?. Strasbourg Observers. https://strasbourgobservers.com/2014/01/13/vallianatos-and-others-v-greece-what-is-in-there-for-lithuania/
Brau, J.A. (2004). The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law. The Columbia Journal of European Law Vol.11, No. 1.
Demirović, R. (2013). Novi pravci u pravnom regulisanju vanbračne zajednice u bosanskohercegovačkom pravu. Zbornik radova sa naučnog skupa „Razvoj porodičnog prava – od nacionalnog do evropskog“ (str. 113-135). Mostar: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta „Džemal Bijedić“
Gillion, C., Turner, 3., Bailey, C., Latulippe, D. (ur.) (2000). Social security pensions - Development and reform. Geneva: International Labour Office
Gómez Heredero, A. (2007). Social security as a human right. Strasbourg: Council of Europe
Guide on Article 8 of the Convenction – Right to respect for private and family life. European Court of Human Rights. Zadnji put ažurirano 30.4.2019.
House of Commons, Briefing Paper No CBP-06348 od 30.1.2019. godine, Thurley, D., Occupational pensions-survivors' benefits for cohabitants
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43094634.pdf
https://www.missoc.org/missoc-database/comparative-tables/
Krešić, B., Omerdić, Dž. (2018). Izjednačavanje prava vanbračnih i bračnih partnera – analiya presude Ustavnog suda Bosne i Hercegovine. Zbornik radova sa naučnog skupa „Imovinskopravni aspekti porodičnih odnosa“ (str. 265-283). Mostar: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta „Džemal Bijedić“
Ljubić Čović A. Legitimno očekivanje (u kontekstu članka 1 Protokola broj 1 Europske konvencije o zaštiti ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda). Nova pravna revija. Br. 1/2016. 29 – 39
Meškić, Z. (2018). Diskriminacija i zaštićeni osnovi u jurisprudenciji Evropskog suda za ljudska prava – trend proširivanja i produbljivanja zaštite. E. Hodžić (Prir.), Evropski sud za ljudska prava i zaštita od diskriminacije, Jurisprudencija i evolucija standarda (str. 25-69). Sarajevo: Analitika – Centar za društvena istraživanja. http://www.analitika.ba/sites/default/files/ECHR%20i%20Anti%20diskriminacija%20%E2%80%93%20Zbornik%20May%202018.pdf%20-za%20web.pdf
Ouald Chaib, S. (2010). Is a more inclusive wind blowing through the Court?. Strasbourg Observers. https://strasbourgobservers.com/2010/04/13/is-a-more-inclusive-wind-blowing-through-the-court/
Ouald Chaib, S., Şerife Yeğit v. Turkey: The Court did it again!, Strasbourgh Observers, https://strasbourgobservers.com/2010/11/10/serife-yigit-v-turkey-the-court-did-it-again/
Pravo vanbračnih drugova na porodičnu penziju – Hrvatska, Francuska, Italija, Njemačka i Slovenija (2015) broj 13/2015. Podgorica: Istraživački centar - Parlamentarni institut, Skupština Crne Gore.
Puppinck, G., The dilution of the family in human rights: Comments on Vallianatos and other ECHR cases on “family life”, dostupno putem linka: https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-dilution-of-the-family-in-human-rights-comments-on-vallianatos-and-other-echr-cases-on-family-life/
Rutten, S. (2010). Protection of spouses in informal marriages by human rights. Utrecht Law Review (str. 76-91). Vol. 6, Issue 2.
Sanz Caballe (2004), S. Unmarried Cohabiting Couples before the European Court of Human Rights: Parity with Marriage. The Columbia Journal of European Law (str. 151-166). Vol.11, No. 1.
Softić Kadenić, D. (2013). Bračni ugovor i ugovor o nasljeđivanju u pravu Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine kao instrumenti jačanja pravnog položaja nadživjelog bračnog partnera. Zbornik radova sa naučnog skupa «Razvoj porodičnog prava – od nacionalnog do evropskog» (135-153). Mostar: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta «Džemal Bijedić»
Softić Kadenić, D. (2011). Novo nasljedno pravo u entitetima Bosne i Hercegovine de lege lata i de lege ferenda. Nova pravna revija broj 2/2011 (36-44)
Tobler, C. (2014). Equality and Non-discrimination under the ECHR and EU Law – A Comparison Focusing on Discrimination against LGBTI Persons (str. 521-561). Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht
Vehabović, F., Izmirlija, M., Kadribašić, A. (2010). Komentar Zakona o zabrani diskriminacije sa objašnjenjima i pregledom prakse u uporednom pravu. Sarajevo: Centar za ljudska prava Univerziteta u Sarajevu