QUASI-LEGAL EFFECTS OF THE LAW NO. 05/L-079 ON STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS OF THE PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT OF AUTONOMOUS PROVINCE KOSOVO AND METOHIJA
Sažetak
With the adoption of Resolution 1244, the United Nations Interim Administration (UNMIK) gains the status of guardian of state and social property R. Serbia in the territory of the AP of Kosovo and Metohija. For the purpose of the paper, the author pays special attention to certain regulations issued by the UNMIK administration that formed the basis for the creation of a quasi-legal system in the area of the AP of Kosovo and Metohija. However, by adopting Regulations with the force of law, UNMIK or the Special Representative unilaterally abrogates the retroactively existing legal system, creating conditions for the establishment of a quasi-legal system independent of the legal system of R. Serbia. UNMIK/REG/1999/24 results in the reincarnation of SFRY-era legal acts. Regulation no. 1999/24 is a guideline in further legal normalization and design of a quasi-legal system in the area of the AP of Kosovo and Metohija. For the purpose of the paper, the author also pays special attention to the Law on Strategic Investments adopted by the Provisional Institutions of of Self-Government the AP of Kosovo and Metohija. The significance of the said law is that it represents another in a series of acts that results in changes in the property and legal regime of state and social property (immovable property). However, full implementation of the law became possible at the time of the adoption of Decision no. 06/134. By decision no. 06/134 allows all real estate registered in the name of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia or the Republic of Yugoslavia, the Socialist Republic of Serbia, that is, the Republic of Serbia and the Socialist Autonomous Province of Kosovo to be registered at the PISG of Kosovo and Metohija as the owner of the immovable .
Key words:
UNMIK, Regulation, quasi-legal system, Law on Strategic Investments, Decision, Strategic Investment, Provisional Institutions of of Self-Government, immovable property.
Reference
Vicovac, R. D. (2013). Challenges in Providing Legal Aid to Displaced Persons Following Armed Conflict: Lessons Learned from Kosovo, Journal of Human Rights Practice (Vol 00 | Number 00 | Month 2013 | pp. 1– 12) (Electronic version). Retrieved 20 September 2019, from http://jhrp.oxfordjournals.org/
Гајић, В. А. (2018). Међународноправни статус Косова и метохије и придруживање Србије Европској Унији, Београд: Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду.
Милојевић, М. (2005). Срби на Косову и Метохији и начела међународног права, (Косовска Митровица 27–29. мај 2005), Српска академија наука и уметности, Београд (219–248).
Челић, Д. (2015). Правни систем и заштита од дискриминације, Дискриминацијом против „Дискриминације“ – Дискриминативне одлуке УНМИК-а („Комисије за стамбена и имовинска питања“), Зборник радова, Прва свеска, Правни факултет, Универзитет у Приштини – Косовска Митровица.
Jürgen, F. (2005). UNMIK in Kosovo: Struggling with Uncertainty, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (Vol. 9, pp. 225–293).
UNMIK/REG/1999/1 On the Authority of the Interim Administration in Kosovo 25 July 1999.
UNMIK/REG/1999/24 On the Law Applicable in Kosovo 12 December 1999.
Law on Strategic Investments No. 05/L-079.
Law on Enterprises of the SFRY (77/78), as amended and supplemented by the Laws of the SFRY no. 40/89, 46/90 and 61/90.
Decision No. 06/134.
https://peacemaker.un.org/kosovo-resolution1244, 20 June 2019.
http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/1999/re99_01.pdf, 20 June 2019.
http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/1999/re99_24.pdf, 20 June 2019.
https://www.srbija.gov.rs/kosovo-metohija/168200 20 June 2019.
www.kryeministri-ks.net/repository/docs/134_odluke_134.docx, 29 August 2019.
http://kta-kosovo.org/html_sr/index.php, 20 July 2019.
http://jhrp.oxfordjournals.org/
https://md.rks-gov.net/page.aspx?id=3,15,1710, 18 August 2019.
http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/3_3_1983.pdf, 30 August 2019.