THE LEGAL NATURE OF THE PREAMBLE OF THE CONSTITUTION
Abstract
Although an integral part of most constitutions, the preamble has for a long time been on the margin of interest of legal studies. The key reason for this is the fact that the legal nature of the preamble has still not been defined. To define it legal nature is a particularly delicate task, as it is a phenomenon which is at the junction between politics and law. In legal theory, there have emerged three perspectives regarding the legal nature of preamble whose legal effect is not established by the constitution itself. According to the first point of view, a preamble is a ceremonial political declaration and introductory statement into the normative part of the constitution, because of which it lacks the operative legal value. The second point of view attributes limited legal significance to the preamble but only as a tool for interpreting unclear constitutional norms, as it classifies them into a relevant socio-political context. According to the third point of view, the preamble is an integral part of the constitution and its legal effect is equal to the normative part of the constitution. The author suggests that any principal viewpoints and extremes should be avoided in drawing conclusions in this field, because the legal nature of the preamble first and foremost depends on its content.
References
Bačić, A. (2013). Konstitucionalizam, historizam i postmodernizam. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu. 50(1). 1-15.
Beinoravičius, D., Mesonis, G., Vainiutė, M. (2015). The role and place of the preamble in Lithuanian constitutional regulation. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics. 8(2). 136–158.
Cannon, R. (1995). Matters of Irish Constitutional Debate: Originalism, Democracy and Natural Law. Irish Student Law Review. 5. 22-38.
Chang, W-C., Law, D. (2018). Constitutional Dissonance in China. U: Jacobsohn, G., Schor, M. (eds.). Comparative Constitutional Theory. Chelthenam UK, Northampton USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Duguit, L. (2007). Manuel de droit constitutionnel. Paris: LGDJ.
Esmein, A. (1921). Éléments de droit constitutionnel français et compare. Tome premier. Paris: L. Larose & L. Tenin.
Фира, A. (2002). Енциклопедија уставног права бивших југословенских земаља. Том IV Уставно право Босне и Херцеговине. Нови Сад: Српска академија наука и уметности – Агенција „Мир“.
Frosini, J. (2017). Constitutional Preambles: More than just a narration of history. University of Illinois Law Review. 2. 603-628.
Frosini, J. (2012). Constitutional Preambles at a Crossroads between Politics and Law. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli Editore.
Ginsburg, T., Foti, N., Rockmore, D. (2014). “We the Peoples”: The Global Origins of Constitutional Preambles. George Washington International Law Review. 46. 101-136.
Granger, M-P. (2011). The Preamble(s) of the French constitution: Content, status, uses and amendment. Acta Juridica Hungarica. 52(1). 1–18.
Haberle, P. (2002). Ustavna država. Zagreb: Politička kultura.
Habib, A. (2016). Primacy and efficacy of preamble propositions in India and Bangladesh. International Journal of Law and Management. 6. 660-672.
Haimbaugh, G. (1974). Was it France’s Marbury v. Madison? Ohio State Law Journal. 35. 910-926.
Himmelfarb, D. (1991-1992). The Preamble in Constitutional Interpretation. 2 Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal. 127. 160-166, 193-201.
Hughes, A. (2014). Human dignity and fundamental rights in South Africa and Ireland. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press.
Јовичић, J. (1977). О уставу. Београд: Савремена администрација.
Келзен, Х. (2010). Општа теорија права и државе. Београд: Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду.
Кутлешић, В. (2010). Преамбуле устава – упоредна студија 194 важећа устава. Анали Правног факултета у Београду. 2. 60-76.
Law, D. (2016). Constitutional Archetypes. Texas Law Review. 95(2). 153-243.
Марковић, Р. (2015). Уставно право. Београд: Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду.
Микић, В. (2014). Функције преамбула савремених устава. Правни записи. 2. 432-447.
Narits, R. (2002). The Republic of Estonia Constitution on the Concept and Value of Law. Juridica International. VII. 10-16.
Orgad, L. (2010). The preamble in constitutional interpretation. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 8(4). 714-738.
Орловић, С. (2019). Уставно право. Нови Сад: Правни факултет Универзитета у Новом Саду.
Pactet, P., Mélin-Soucramanien, F. (2009). Droit constitutionnel, Paris: LGDJ.
Петров, В., Станић, М. (2019). Религијски елементи у преамбулама устава са посебним освртом на европске земље. У: Чоловић, В., и др. (ур.). Државно – црквено право кроз векове, Београд – Будва: Институт за упоредно право. 341-356.
Rautenbach, I.M. Constutional Law. Durban: LexisNexis.
Roach, K. (2001). The Uses and Audiences of Preambles in Legislation. McGill Law Journal. 47. 129-159.
Rousseau, D. (2006). Droit du contentieux constitutionnel. Paris: LGDJ.
Симовић, Д. (2019). Правни домашај преамбуле устава у уставном систему Босне и Херцеговине. У: Лукић, Р. (ур.). Право и вриједности. Источно Сарајево: Правни факултет. 93–109.
Симовић, Д., Петров, В. (2018). Уставно право. Београд: Криминалистичко-полицијски универзитет.
Simović, D. (2017). Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji. U: Šarčević, E., Simović, D. (ur.). Reviziona vlast u Srbiji. Sarajevo: Fondacija Centar za javno pravo. 63-89.
Станић, М. (2019). Носилац суверености у уставним преамбулама. Архив за правне и друштвене науке, 1-2. 123-142.
Стојановић, Д. (2007). Уставно право. Ниш: Свен.
Trnka, K. (2006). Ustavno pravo. Sarajevo: Fakultet za javnu upravu.
Vedel, G. (2002). Manuel élémentaire de droit constitutionnel. Paris: Dalloz.
Voermans, W., Stremler, M., Cliteur, P. (2017). Constitutional Preambles: A Comparative Analysis. Chelthenam UK, Northampton USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Vukas, B. (2013). Pravnopovijesne reference u ustavnim preambulama država srednje i jugoistočne Europe u postkomunističkom razdoblju. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu. 63(5-6). 1233-1255.
Winckel, A. (1999). The Contextual Role of a Preamble in Statutory Interpretation. Melbourne University Law Review. 23(1). 184-210.
Winckel, A. (2000). The Constitutional and Legal Significance of the Preamble to the Commonwealth Constitution, Past, Present and Future. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.