BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF INCOME AS AN ANTIABUSIVE MEASURE IN SERBIAN TAX LAW

  • Miloš Vasović Student doktorskih studija - Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
Keywords: beneficial ownership concept, conduit companies, double tax treaties, treaty shopping, tax planning

Abstract


Serbian domestic tax law on corporate income contains beneficial ownership of income provision (BO provision) which represents one of two terms for the use of preferential withholding tax rate from the application of double tax treaties (DTT). Subject of research is the undefined term „beneficial ownership“ in domestic tax law which can lead to „treaty shopping“ through the use of conduit companies. The BO provision is given function of an anti-abusive measure as well as an attribution of income rule. We will analyze the current function of BO provision given in Serbian tax law and its inadequate application. The author represents the stance of BO provision as an anti-abusive measure and examines the possible application of this provision in domestic law within articles 10, 11. and 12. of DTTs with regard to the same articles of OECD Model-Convention and Commentary, in order to prevent „treaty shopping“. At the end of this article, the author brings up the reasons why Serbia needs BO provision as an anti-abusive measure in its domestic tax law.

References

Arnold, B. J. (2016). International Tax Primer. Холандија: Kluwer Law International BV.
Aigner, D.Ј. (2006).The concept of beneficial ownership, у: D. Ј Aigner (ур.) и L. Glaser (ур.), M. Tumpel (ур.), The taxation of savings interest income in the European capital market. Wien: Linde.
Armelin D. V. ( 2016). Treaty abuse and beneficial ownership: latest OECD developments, у: D. W. Blum (ур.), M. Seiler (ур.), M. Lang (ур.), Preventing treaty abuse. Wien: Linde.
Vann, R. J. (1998). International aspects of Income tax, у: V. Thuronyi (ур.), Tax law design and drafting, Volume 2. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Дабетић Д., Татић И. (ур.) (2008) Република Србија и избегавање двоструког опорезивања. Београд: Савез рачуновођа и ревизора Србије „Рачуноводство“ д.о.о.
Zuk М. (2013). The Beneficial ownership concept in tax treaties, у: K. Simader (ур.), E. Titz (ур.), Limits to tax planning. Wien: Linde.
Jimenez А. М. (2013). Beneficial ownership as an attribution of income rule in Spain: source and residence country perspectives, у: M. Lang (ур..), P. Pistone (ур.), J. Schuch (ур.), C. Staringer (ур.), A. Storck (ур.), Beneficial Ownership: Recent Trends. Amsterdam: IBFD.
Јелић Р. (2000). Својина у англосаксонском праву. Правни живот. 10 (IL).
Pistone P. (2018). The Concept of beneficial ownership in tax treaties and its general anti-avoidance function, у: M. lang (ур.), A. Rust (ур.), J. Owens (ур.), Tax treaty case law around the globe 2017. Wien: Linde.
Поповић Д., Костић С. В. (2009) Уговори Србије о избегавању двоструког опорезивања – правни оквир и тумачење. Београд: Cekos In.
Rust A. (2006). Tax treaties in the hierarchy of law, у: G. Maisto (ур.), Tax treaties and domestic tax law. Amsterdam: IBFD.
Finnerty C. J., Merks P., Petriccione M., Russo R. (ур.) (2007) Fundamentals of international tax planning, Amsterdam: IBFD.
Published
2020/12/23
Section
Original Scientific Paper