LIABILITY IN THE CONTEXT OF BLOCKCHAIN-SMART CONTRACT NEXUS: INTRODUCTORY CONSIDERATIONS
Abstract
Blockchain technology becomes relevant in economic exchange as it lowers costs and adds efficiency to transactions` implementation. The key quality of Blockchain lies in ensuring the authenticity of digital data: trust in the traditional legal relationship has been replaced by digital verification of data in blocks. As the important phenomenon, Blockchain demands legal answers to the issues raised by its implementation. An example of this development is the legal regime of smart contracts. A smart contract is a contract in which any rights and obligations of contracting parties are programmed in a code. Being the result of Blockchain technology application, such a contract is characterized by the need for mutual trust between the contracting parties. As legal phenomenon, Blockchain/smart contract technology raises issue of liability for fulfilment of contractual duties. Smart contracts are able to minimize certain contract risks and additionally simplify contract execution. In addition, the contract implementation does not require any further interaction between the contracting parties. Furthermore, essential components of the smart contract are the digitally verifiable information and the legally relevant actions that the smart contract carries out based on the information received. All of enlisted issues are of importance for proper comprehension of legal liability of Blockchain actors.
References
Ducas, E, Wilner, A (2017): The security on Financial Implications of Blockchain Technologies: Regulating Emerging Technologies in Canada, International Journal, No. 72/2017, 538-562.
Distributed Ledger Technology: Beyond Block Chain. A Report by the UK Government Chief Scientific Adviser, 2016. Accessed on 01. 08. 2019.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/492972/gs-16-1-distributed-ledger-technology.pdf
Ethereum White Paper, Accessed 05. 03. 2020. https://blockchainlab.com/pdf/Ethereum_white_paper-_next_generation_smart_contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalik-buterin.pdf
Grigg, I, The Ricardian contract (1996). Accessed 02. 06. 2020. http://iang.org/papers/ricardian_contract.html
Kaulartz, M., & Heckmann, J. (2016). Smart Contracts-Anwendungen der Blockchain-Technologie. Computer und Recht, 32(9), 618
Lauslahti, K, Mattila,J & Seppälä, T (2017). Smart Contracts – How will Blockchain Technology Affect Contractual Practices? ETLA Reports No 68. Accessed 13. 04. 2019. https://pub.etla.fi/ETLA-Raportit-Reports-68.pdf,.
Leiner B.M. et al., ‘Brief History of the Internet’ (Internet Society, 1997) p. 3. Accessed 1. 3. 2020. https://www.internetsociety.org/internet/history-internet/brief-history-internet.
Lessig, L, Code is Law, Harward Magazine (2000). Accessed 01. 07. 2020. https://davelevy.info/wiki/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Code-is-Law.pdf
Malta Digital Innovation Authority Act C901. Accessed 01. 08. 2019. http://justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lp&itemid=29080&l=1 of 11 November 2018.
Sherborne, A. (2017). Blockchain, Smart Contracts and Lawyers. Accessed 01. 08. 2019. https://www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=17badeaa-072a-403b-b63c-8fbd985d198b
Study on Blockchains: Legal, Governance and Interoperability aspects (SMART 2018/0038) , European Commission (hereinafter: Study on Blockchains). Accessed on 1. 5. 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/study-blockchains-legal-governance-and-interoperability-aspects-smart-20180038
Szabo, N, Smart Contracts: Building Blocks for Digital Markets (1996) Accessed 1. 04. 2020. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart_contracts_2.html.