WITHDRAWAL FROM THE EU – CONSEQUENCES UNDER EU AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
Abstract
Article 50 TEU, as the sole legal mechanism for withdrawal provided by EU law, affords substantial flexibility to the withdrawal process overall, and to the scope of a possible withdrawal agreement in particular. Considering the unfolding of Brexit thus far, it appears that the flexibility of Art. 50 TEU has withstood the test of practice and proven to be wisely devised. On the other hand, the ongoing deliberately undertaken steps of the UK Government to breach the Withdrawal Agreement and, consequently, EU law, show that the binding effect of EU law is not a legal phenomenon per se, but rather a direct consequence of the political and value-based significance of the EU for its Member States and their citizens.
The agreed detailed regulation of rights of individual persons – EU nationals residing, working or studying in the UK and vice versa – in the EU – UK Withdrawal Agreement, despite failures to reach agreement in relation to numerous other issues, shows the strength of the phenomenon of acquired personal rights. Brexit has confirmed in practice that there is still no supranational EU citizenship, independent and different from Member State citizenship.
The peculiar and complex institutional setup of the EU causes significant issues in respect of the relations of the withdrawing state with the EU and its remaining Member States, third states and international organizations. The fate of international obligations in relation to third parties, acquired prior to withdrawal by the EU, as well as by the withdrawing state together with the EU, by virtue of mixed agreements, remains unclear and thus creates great uncertainty.
Numerous difficulties, disputes, costs and uncertainties created by Brexit seem to confirm the view that the true essence of the EU lies in a political and value-based union which aspires to an even stronger unity than the one that exists at present. A withdrawal from such a union is a phenomenon that is difficult to imagine and regulate.
References
Judgment of 2 March 2010, Janko Rottman v Freistaat Bayern, C-135/08, ECLI:EU:C:2010:104
TEU – Treaty on the European Union. Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union
OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 13–390.
TFEU – Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 47–390.
Letter of 29 March 2017 from the UK Prime Minister to the President of European Council – Article 50 Notification Letter. Retrieved 30 September 2020 from https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/XT-20001-2017-INIT/en/pdf ;
Judgment of 10 December 2018, Wightman v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, C-621/18, ECLI:EU:C:2018:999
Judgment of 12 March 2019, M.G. Tjebbes and Others v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, C-221/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:189
Council Decision (EU) 2020/135 of 30 January 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, OJ L 29, 31.1.2020, p. 1-6.
Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, OJ L 29, 31.1.2020, p. 7–187
Political declaration setting out the framework for the future relationship between the European Union and the United Kingdom, OJ L 34, 31.1.2020, 1-16.
Academic literature, public statements and media reports
Benrath, D. (2018). Bona Fide and Revocation of Withdrawal: How Article 50 TEU Handles the Potential Abuse of a Unilateral Revocation of Withdrawal. European Law Review. 43. 234-248.
Cîrlig, C.-C. (2020). EU and UK Citizens’s Rights After Brexit. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service.
Cottier, T. (2018). Trade Policy in the Age of Populism: Why the New Bilateralism Will Not Work. In: Fitzgerald, O. E., Lein, E. (eds.). Complexity’s Embrace: The International Law Implications of Brexit pp. 71-84. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
Craig, P. (2016). Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 45/2016, Brexit: A Drama in Six Acts. Retrieved 30 September 2020 from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2807975
Dammann, J. (2018). A Little Bit Brexit? An Analysis of the Rules Governing Post-Withdrawal Treaties. Texas International Law Journal. 53 (2). 153-175.
Daswhood, A. (2013). The United Kingdom in a Re-Formed European Union. European Union Law Review. 38. 737-756.
European Commission. Statement by the European Commission following the extraordinary meeting of the EU-UK Joint Committee of 10 September 2020. Retrieved 30 September 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_20_1607 ;
European Commission. Withdrawal Agreement: European Commission sends letter of formal notice to the United Kingdom for breach of its obligations. 1 October 2020. Retrieved 1 October 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_1798 ;
The Guardian, Brexit: EU launches legal action against UK for breaching withdrawal agreement, 1 October 2020. Retreived 1 Octoboer 2020 from: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/oct/01/brexit-eu-launches-legal-action-against-uk-for-breaching-withdrawal-agreement ;
Garner, O. (2018). The ECJ Confirms that Article 50 Notification can be Unilaterally Revoked. Retrieved 30 September 2020 from: http://dcubrexitinstitute.eu/2018/12/the-ecj-confirms-that-article-50-notification-can-be-unilaterally-revoked/
Gehring, M., Phillips, F.-K. (2018). Brexit and Environmental Law: The Rocky Road Ahead. In: Fitzgerald, O. E., Lein, E. (eds.). Complexity’s Embrace: The International Law Implications of Brexit pp. 209-223. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
Hughes, V. (2018). Brexit and International Trade: One Year after the Referendum. In: Fitzgerald, O. E., Lein, E. (eds.). Complexity’s Embrace: The International Law Implications of Brexit pp. 9-30. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
Institute for Government, Brexit Brief: Article 50. Retrieved 30 September 2020 from https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/brexit/brexit-brief-article-50 ;
Author. (2011).
Author. (2012).
Author. (2015).
Odermatt, J. (2017). Brexit and International Law: Disentangling Legal Orders. Emory International Law Review. 31. 1051-1073.
Peihani, M. (2018). Brexit and Financial Services: Navigating through the Complexity of Exit Scenarios. In: Fitzgerald, O. E., Lein, E. (eds.). Complexity’s Embrace: The International Law Implications of Brexit pp. 87-103. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
Perakis, M. (2018). Does the principle of the autonomy of the EU legal order allow for a Member State to revoke the notification of its withdrawal from the EU? . Retrieved 30 September 2020 from https://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/10/31/does-the-principle-of-the-autonomy-of-the-eu-legal-order-allow-for-a-member-state-to-revoke-the-notification-of-its-withdrawal-from-the-eu/ ;
Perakis, M. (2019). Exiting the European Union: Legal Procedure, Dimensions and Implications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Rakić, B. (2020). Obrnuta diskriminacija u Evropskoj uniji [Reverse discrimination in the European Union]. In Krstić, I, Bajović, V. (eds.) Identitetski preobražaj Srbije: prilozi projektu 2019 – kolektivna monografija [Identity transformation of Serbia: contributions to the project 2019 – a collective monograph] (pp. 63-100). Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Pravni fakultet.
Wyrozumska, A. (2012). Withdrawal from the Union. In Blanke, H.-J., Mangiameli, S. (eds.), The European Union after Lisbon (pp. 343-365). Heidelberg: Springer.