THE COMPOSITION OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF SERBIA: CHALLENGES AND OBSTACLES
Abstract
Given that political parties participate in the formation, structuring and activity of the parliament, their presence has produced a double impact on the National Assembly of Serbia in the past three decades. On the one hand, their influence has been reflected in the internal structure and efficiency of parliamentary work, while on the other hand, the party system combined with the electoral model left its mark on the manner of political representation. The focus of the paper will be on the impact the political parties had made on the national assembly in the Republic of Serbia, i.e. their influence on the internal organization of the Assembly and consequences on the effectiveness in the parliamentary process. The main goal is to explore the normative framework and parliamentary practice regarding the real possibilities of the National Assembly in fulfilling the basic postulates for the realization of effective national representation. The main question is whether the Assembly, based on its constitutional autonomy, is able to achieve the goals of the “working parliament” and the political representation of all citizens? The problem develops around the extent to which the people's representation is capable of exercising its constitutional functions if it does not support and protect the differentiated political will of the people. The aim is to point out the possibilities provided by the normative framework, as well as the need for successful parliamentary practice in the realization of parliamentary autonomy. Parliamentary autonomy is necessary not only for the sake of good internal organization and the effectiveness in the parliamentary process but also externally, in strengthening the National Assembly position towards the holders of executive power. The subject of the analysis will be the activities of political parties in the parliament through parliamentary groups and parliamentary committees, as well as a lack of parliamentary opposition guarantees.
References
Antonić, S. (1997). "Parlamentarizam u Jugoslaviji 1990-1996". Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke. (2). 177-198.
Beyme, K.v. (2000). Parliamentary Democracy: Democratization, Destabilization, Reconsolidation 1789-1999. London: Macmillan Press.
Bobio, N. (1990). Budućnost demokratije - Odbrana pravila igre. Beograd: Libertas.
Borchert, H. (1977). “Fraktion – eine eigenständige demokratisch legitimierte Repräsentation im parteienstaatlichen parlamentarischen System”. Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts. Band 102. 210-242.
Bundesverfassungsgericht, Headnotes to the Judgement of the Second Senate of 03 May 2016-2, be 4/14. Available at:
https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/EN/2016/05/es20160503_2bve000414en.html
Burdeau, G., Hamon F., Troper M., (1995). Droit constitutionnel. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Cancik, P. (1998). „Oppositionszugehörigkeit als Anspruchsvoraussetzung: Das Definitionsproblem der neuen Oppositionsregelungen“. Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts. Band 123, (4). 623-645.
Damgaard, E. (1995). „How parties control committee members“. In H. Döring (ed.), Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin’s Press. 308–325.
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), „Parameters on the Relationship between the Parliamentary Majority and the Opposition in a Democracy: A Checklist Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 119th Plenary Session (Venice, 21-22 June 2019) Strasbourg, 24 June 2019 Opinion No. 845 / 2016 CDL-AD(2019)015. Available at:: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2019)015-e
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), CDL-AD (2011) 001, § 74, CDL-AD (2013) 012, § 136. Available at:
https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=cdl-ad(2013)012-e
Goati, V. (2013). Izbori u Srbiji i Crnoj Gori od 1990. do 2013. i u SRJ od 1992 do 2013. Beograd: NDI, CeSID.
Hague, R., Harrop, M. (2004). Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Henke, W. (1972). Das Recht der politischen Parteien, Schwartz, Gỏttingen, 1972.
https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2019)015-e
Informator o radu, Narodna skupština Republike Srbije, 2018. Available at: http://www.parlament.gov.rs/upload/documents/Informator%20Lat.pdf
Mattson, I., Strøm, K. (1995). „Parliamentary Committees“. In Döring, H. (ed.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin’s Press. 249-307.
Maunz, Th., Zippelius, R. (1994). Deutsches Staatsrecht. Mủnchen: C.H.Beck`sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
McGann, A. (2006). „Social choice and comparing legislatures: Constitutional versus institutional constraints“. The Journal of Legislative Studies. Vol. 12. No. 3-4. 443-461.
Mény, Y., Knapp, A. (1998). Government and Politics in Western Europe: Britain. France, Italy, Germany, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Müller, W.C. (2000). „Political parties in parliamentary democracies: Making delegation and accountability work“. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 37. 309–333.
Orlović, S. (2011). „Partijski sistem Srbije“. U: Partije i izbori u Srbiji: 20 godina. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka: Centar za demokratiju: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. 11-70.
Pejić, I. (2019). "The Constitutional Rationalization of the Separation of Powers: The Case of Serbia". Collection of Papers, Faculty of Law Niš. 84. 45-62.
“Poslovnik Narodne skupštine”, Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, br. 20/2012.
Spasojević, D. (2011). „Dinamika političkih rascepa u Srbiji 2000-2010.“ U: Partije i izbori u Srbiji: 20 godina. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka: Centar za demokratiju: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. 105-117.
Stojiljković, Z. (2007). „Partije u parlamentu“, U: V.Pavlović, S.Orlović, ur. Dileme i izazovi parlamentarizma, Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka.105-128.
Stüwe, K. (2006). “Bundesverfassungsgericht und Opposition”. In R.C. van Ooyen, M.H.W. Möllers, (eds.) Das Bundesverfassungsgericht im politischen System. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. 215-228.
Thiébault, J.L. (2000). „Forming and Maintaining Government Coalitions in the Fifth Republic“. In Müller, W.C. and Strøm, K. (eds.), Coalition Governments in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 498-528.
“Ustav Republike Srbije”, Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, br. 98/2006.
Vasović, V., Goati, V. (1993). Izbori i izborni sistemi. Beograd: IBN, Radnička štampa.
Verfassung des landes Schleswig-Holstein, Fassung vom 2. Dezember 2014. (Available at: http://www.gesetze-rechtsprechung.sh.juris.de/jportal/?quelle=jlink&query=Verf+SH&psml=bsshoprod.psml&max=true&aiz=true)
Wiberg, M. (1995). “Parliamentary Questioning: Control by Communication?”. In H.Döring (ed.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. St.Martin`s Press. 179-222.
Zajc, D. (2016). “Role of opposition in contemporary parliamentary democracies – The case of Slovenia”. Journal of Comparative Politics. Vol. 9. No. 1. 19-35.