DEFINITION OF FUNDAMENTAL BREACH OF CONTRACT OF INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS
Abstract
The fundamental breach of contract is defined by the article 25 of the CISG which states: “A breach of contract committed by one of the parties is fundamental if it results in such detriment to the other party as substantially to deprive him of what he is entitled to expect under the contract, unless the party in breach did not foresee and a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances would not have foreseen such a result.”
When fundamental breach of contract occurs, deprived party (seller or buyer) has a right to avoid a contract. Avoidance of contract is remedy of last resort, in the situation when other remedies are ineffective.
For existence of fundamental breach of contract, on the basis of the article 25 of the CISG, there are two criteria which must be fulfilled. First criterion is of objective nature and comprises two conditions: a) breach of obligation defined in contract or in the CISG and b) such breach substantially deprives other party of what she is entitled to expect under the contract. Second criterion is subjective: the breaching party needs to foresee that result. This criterion has also objective element, through the usage of the standard of reasonable person. Hence, even in situation when breaching party did not foresee substantial deprivation of other party as a result of its breach, it will be considered that substantial breach of contract exist if reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances would foreseen such a result.
References
Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal. 6(1). 113-144.
Fayyad, M. (2019). Fundamental Breach of Contract in Terms of the UN Sales Convention and Emirates Law: A Comparative Legal Study. Arab Law Quarterly. 33.109-151.
Ferrari, F. (2006). Fundamental Breach of Contract Under the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods – 25 Years of Article 25 CISG. Journal of Law and Commerce. 25/2006. 489-500.
Ferrari, F. (2005). Fundamental breach of contract under the un sales convention 25 years article 25 cisg. International Business Law Journal. 2005(3). 389-400.
Hannold, J. (1999). Uniform Law for International Sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Ishida, Y. (2020). Identifying Fundamental Breach of Articles 25 and 49 of the CISG: The Good Faith Duty of Collaborative Efforts to Cure Defects - Make the Parties Draw a Line in the Sand of Substantiality. Michigan Journal of International Law. 41(1). 63-108.
Jovičić, K. (2018). The Concept of the Fundamental Breach of Contract in the CISG. Strani pravni život. 4/2018. 39-50.
Jovičić, K. (2017). Posebni slučajevi kada se ugovor može raskinuti prema Bečkoj konvenciji. Strani pravni život. 1/2017. 51-62.
Magnus, U. (2005). The Remedy of Avoidance of Contract Under CISG—General Remarks and Special Cases. Journal of Law and Commerce. 25. 423-436.
Malkawi, B. (2020). CISG: The Relation among Cure, Fundamental Breach, and Avoidance. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization. 93. 24-44.
Pauly, C. (2000). The concept of fundamental breach as an international principle to create uniformity of commercial law. Journal of Law and Commerce. 19(2). 221-244.
Perović, J. (2004). Bitna povreda ugovora – Međunarodna prodaja robe. Beograd: Službeni list SCG.
Perović, J. (2002). Raskid ugovora prema Konvenciji UN o međunarodnoj prodaji robe. Ekonomski anali. 155. 163-177.
Will, M. (1987). Article 25. U Bianca, C.M. i Bonell, M. J. (Prir.). Commentary on the International Sales Law, The 1980 Vienna Sales Convention. Milan: Giuffrè. 209-212.
Вукадиновић, Р. (2012). Међународно пословно право. Крагујевац: Центар за право Европске уније.
Ћирић, А. (2018). Међународно трговинско право – Посебни део. Ниш: Правни факултет Универзитета у Нишу.
Фишер Шобот, С. (2014). Право међународне продаје. Нови Сад: Правни факултет Универзитета у Новом Саду.