CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENDUM AND JUDICIAL REFORM IN SERBIA

  • Irena Pejić Faculty of Law, University of Niš
Keywords: Constitution of the Republic of Serbia. Constitutional Revision. Judicial Reform.

Abstract


Abstract: The process of constitutional revision can be viewed from two points: the first, which refers to the elements of the constitutional change procedure, and the second, which requires a review of the subject of constitutional revision contained in the Act on the Revision of the Constitution. This paper discusses the legitimation of the Act amending the Constitution, as well as new constitutional solutions that change the provisions on the election of judges and public prosecutors, and the provisions on judicial councils in the Republic of Serbia.

References

REFERENCES


Bobek, M. (2008). „The Fortress of Judicial Independence“. European Public Law. 14 (1). 99-123.


Dika. M. (1992). O razvitku instituta sudske (sudačke) nezavisnosti u zapadnoevropskom civilizacijskom krugu. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu. 42. 511-531.


Konstan, B. (2000). Principi politike i drugi spisi. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.


Lič, F.(2007). Obraćanje Evropskom sudu za ljudska prava (knjiga I).  Beograd: Beogradski centar za ljudska prava.


Pejić, I. (2014). Konstitucionalizacija sudske nezavisnosti: uporedno i iskustvo Srbije. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu. 68. 157-175.


Pejić, I. (2018). Ustavna revizija: procedura u kontekstu ustavotvorne vlasti. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 80. 65-83.


Pajvančić, M. (2009). Komentar Ustava Republike Srbije, Beograd: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.


Rakić-Vodinelić, V., Knežević Bojović, A., Reljanović, M., (2012). Reforma pravosuđa u Srbiji 2008-2012, Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta Union, JU Službeni glasnik.


Russell,P.H. (2001).Toward a General Theory of Judicial Independence. In Russell,P.H., O`Brien D.M. (eds.). Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World. Virginia: University Press of Virginia. 1-24.


Smith, R.K.M. (2003). International Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Shetreet, S. (2001). The Critical Challenge of Judicial Independence in Israel. In P.H.Russell, D.M.O`Brien (eds.). Judical Independence in the Age of Democracy, Critical Perspectives from around the World. Virginia: University Press of Virginia. 233-250.


Triva, S. (1989). Profesionalni sudci u Francuskoj: Obrazovanje, regrutiranje, napredovanje i odgovornost sudaca. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu. 39/2. 1989. 223-251.


Legal acts/sources:


Venice Commission CDL-AD(2021)032-e. Serbia - Opinion on the draft Constitutional Amendments on the Judiciary and draft Constitutional Law for the Implementation of the Constitutional Amendments, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 128th Plenary Session (Venice and online, 15-16 October 2021)


Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of the RS no. 98/2006


Act on Revision of the Constitution of Serbia, Official Gazette of the RS no. 115/2021


Constitutional Law for the implementation of the Act on Revision of the Constitution of Serbia, Official Gazette of the RS no. 115/2021


 

Published
2022/06/23
Section
Review Paper