BEGINNING OF CRIMINAL OFFENSE IN EUROCONTINENTAL AND ANGLOSAXON CRIMINAL LAW

  • Dragana Vasiljević Fakultet bezbjednosnih nauka, Univerzitet u Banjoj Luci
Keywords: criminal attempt, criminal offense, preparatory actions, Eurocontinental criminal law, Anglo-Saxon criminal law

Abstract


Clear and precise definition of the activity that marks the beginning of the commission of a criminal offense, as the boundary between the fundamentally unpunished and the punishable stage of its realization, is of great importance for criminal law. Modern criminal legislation and the doctrine of criminal law are guided by different criteria in determining this boundary. In the Eurocontinental legal system, the definition of criminal attempt is found in theories, while criminal legislation in the Anglo-Saxon criminal justice system in its casuistry rely more on appropriate tests. The article analyzes the theoretical and legislative solutions of the beginning of the commission of a criminal offense and its delimitation from the stage of preparation in Eurocontinental and Anglo-Saxon criminal law.

References

Becker, C. L. (1974). Criminal Attempt and the Theory of the Law of Crimes. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 3(3). 262 – 294.

Beulke, W. (2018). Klausurenkurs im Straafrecht III.  Heidelberg: C.F.Müller.

Bohlander, M. (2009). Principles of german criminal law, Studies in international and Comparative Criminal Law. Oregon, Oxford and Portland.

Cambell, C. M. (2013). Crossing the Rubicons An Argument for Adopting the Model Penal Code Formulation of Criminal Attempt in Massachusetts. New England Law Review. 47. 949 – 983.

Clarkson, M. V. C. (2009). Attempt: The Conduct Requirement. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 29(1). 25 – 41.

Claus, R. (2003). Strafrecht – Allgemeiner Teil – Band II. München: C.H. Beck.

Duff, R. A. (2004). Criminal Attempts. Oxford:  Clarendon Pres.

Duff, R. A. (2012). Guiding Commitmrnts and Criminal Liability for Attempts. Crim Law and Philos. 6. 411 – 427.

Enker, N. A. (1977). Mens rea and Criminal Attempt. American Bar Foundation Research Journal. 4. 845 – 879.

Fishman, R. M. (2015). Defining Attempts: Mandujanos Eror.  Duke Law Journal. 65. 346 – 384.

Freund, G. Rostalski, F. (2019). Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

Gropp, W. (2015). Strafrecht – Allgemeiner Teil. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

Hall, J. (1940). Criminal Attempt – a Study of Foundations of Criminal Liability. Yale Law Journal. 49(5). 789 – 840.

Hamish, S. (2001). The Centrality of the Act Requirement for Criminal Attempts. University of Toronto Law Journal. 51. 399 – 424.

Jakobs, G. (1991). Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil. Berlin – New York: De Gruyter.

Jefferson, M. (2007). Criminal law. Harlow: Pearson education.

Klotter, J. Pollock, J. (2006). Criminal Law. Anderson Publishing.

Mathis, S. (2004). Criminal Attempts and Objectivism/Subjectivism Debate. Ratio Juris. 17(3). 328 – 345.

Maurach, R. G. K. Zipf, H. Dölling, H. Laue, D. Renzikowski, J. C. (2014). Strafrecht Allgemeinre Teil. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller.

Novoselec, P. (2008). Razgraničenje pripremnih radnji i pokušaja. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta sveučilišta u Rijeci. 2. 721 – 759.

Safferling, J. M. C. (2006). Die Abgrenzung zwischen strafloser Vorbereitung und strafbarem Versuch im deutschen, europäischen und im Völkerstrafrecht. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft. 3. 682 – 716.

Sayre Bowes, F. (1928). Criminal Attempts. Harvard Law Review. 41(7). 821-859.  

Schönke, A. Schröder, H. (2010). Strafgesetztbuch Kommentar. München: Verlag C.H. Beck.

Shahar, O. B. Harel, A. (1996). The economics of the Law of Criminal Attempts: a Victim-centered perspective. University of Pensilvanija Law Review. 145. 299 – 351.

Sim, P. B. A. (1955). The Actus Reus in Criminal Attempts. The Modern Law Review 18(6). 620 – 623.

Wishart, H. (2013). Criminal Culpability, Criminal Attempt and the Erosion of the Choise Theory. The Journal of Criminal Law. 77. 78 – 90.

Вуковић, И. (2021). Kривично право општи део. Београд: Правни факултет.

Милић, И. (2017). Да ли је кривично дело увек најтеже казнено дело? (II део). Зборник радова Правног факултета у Новом Саду. 2. 405 – 415.

 

 

***

 

Criminal Code of Finland, 39/1889, amendments up to 766/2015. Преузето 23.12.2021. https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1889/en18890039.pdf>

Criminal Code of Swiss Confederation, of 21. December 1937. Преузето 01.02.2022. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/54/757_781_799/en>

Penal Code of the French Republic, updated 12.10.2005. Преузето 03.01.2022. https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/3316/file/France_Criminal%20Code%20updated%20on%2012-10-2005.pdf>

Model Penal Code. Преузето 18.10.2021. https://www. Pravo.unizg.hr

Римски статут Међународног кривичног суда. Преузето 11.01.2022. https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf

Kazneni zakon Hrvatske. Narodne novine RH. Br. 125/11, 144/12, 56/15, 61/15, 101/17, 118/18 i 126/19.

Published
2022/12/15
Section
Review Paper