FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION OF JUDGES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  • Igor M Milinković Faculty of Law of the University of Banja Luka
Keywords: freedom of association, judges, professional associations, political parties, secret societies

Abstract


Freedom of association is one of the fundamental freedoms and is considered one of the necessary elements of a free society. Isolated from other members of the community, an individual would have little chance of successfully resisting the arbitrariness of the ruler, or of fighting for social changes that he deems justified. Although judges also possess this right, the nature of the office they hold may require the establishment of certain restrictions on its exercise to protect the dignity of the judicial office and public confidence in the independence and impartiality of the judiciary.

In the first part of the paper, the importance of the realization of the right to freedom of association of judges will be emphasized. Attention will be drawn to the role that professional associations of judges play in preserving the independence of the judiciary, as well as protecting the rule of law and a democratic order. After pointing out the relevant provisions of international documents and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the restrictions on the freedom of association of judges adopted in various national legislations will be analyzed (special attention will be given to the justifiability of prohibiting judges from joining political parties, as well as the dilemmas arising from the membership of judges in secret societies, i.e. other organizations operating on similar grounds). In the second part of the paper, the legal framework of the freedom of association of judges in Bosnia and Herzegovina will be analyzed.

Author Biography

Igor M Milinković, Faculty of Law of the University of Banja Luka

Full Professor

Head of the State Law Department

Faculty of Law of the University of Banja Luka

References

References:

Bado, A. (2013). “Fair” Selection of Judges in Modern Democracies. In Bado, A. (ed.), Fair Trial and Judicial Independence: Hungarian Perspectives (pp. 27-58). Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.

Bočer, H.E. (2018). Sindikalno udruživanje sudija u Nemačkoj – ili: od monolitizma do pluralizma. U Iskustva strukovnih udruženja sudija u očuvanju nezavisnosti sudstva. Beograd: Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji.

Bonetto, G.M. (1981). Alexis de Tocqueville's concept of political parties. American Studies 22(2).

Boyd, R. (2008). The Madisonian paradox of freedom of association. Social Philosophy and Policy 25(2).

Brownlee, K. (2016). Freedom of Association. In Lippert-Rasmussen, K., Brownlee, K., Coady, D. (eds.), A Companion to Applied Philosophy (pp. 356-369). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Commentary on the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct. (2007). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

Dijkstra, S. (2017). The Freedom of the Judge to Express his Personal Opinions and Convictions under the ECHR. Utrecht Law Review 13(1).

Freedom of Association: Proceedings of Seminar organised by the Secretariat General of the Council of Europe in collaboration with the Ministry of Justice of Island, Reykjavik, 26-28 August 1993. (1994). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press.

Gilles, P. (1985). Germany: Judicial Independence and the Involvement of Judges in Party Politics and Trade Union Activities. In Shetreet, S., Deschênes, J. (eds.), Judicial Independence (pp. 96-116). Dordrecht – Boston – Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Golubovic, D. (2013). Freedom of association in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The International Journal of Human Rights 17(7-8).

Kateb, G. (1998). Value of Association. In Gutmann, A. (ed.), Freedom of Association (pp. 35-63). Princeton-Chichester: Princeton University Press.

Kauffman, B.W. (1982). Judicial Selection in Pennsylvania: A Proposal. Villanova Law Review Vol 27.

Kiener, R. (2012). Judicial independence in Switzerland. In Seibert-Fohr, A. (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (pp. 403-446). Springer.

Larkin, E.A. (2020). Judicial selection methods: Judicial independence and popular democracy. Denver Law Review 79(1).

Matthes, C.Y. (2022). Judges as activists: how Polish judges mobilise to defend the rule of law. East European Politics Vol. 38(3).

Mill, J.S. (2009). On Liberty. The Floating Press.

Morn, F., Toro, M. (1990). The Legal Culture and Legal System in Post-Franco Spain. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 14(1-2).

Rawls, J. (2005). Political Liberalism (Expanded Edition). New York: Columbia University Press.

Sakharuk, I. (2021). The Protection of the Worker’s Right to Freedom of Association: the ECtHR Case-Law. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 1(9).

Samuels, A. (2005). Legal comment: Freemasonry. Is Freemasonry lawful in England? Can the Government or other public body or employer prevent or penalise membership of Freemasonry?, Mountbatten Journal of Legal Studies 9(1-2).

Sanders, A. (2020). Muzzling Associations of Judges: The Duty of Judges to Declare Membership in an Association under Poland’s so-called “Muzzle Law”. VerfBlog, 2020/3/05. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/muzzling-associations-of-judges/ (Accessed on 10 September, 2022).

Shetreet, S., Turenne, S. (2013). Judges on Trial: The Independence and Accountability of the English Judiciary. Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stephens, O.H., Scheb, J.M. (2007). American Constitutional Law Volume II: Civil Rights and Liberties. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.

Schabas, W.A. (2015). The European convention on human rights: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swepston, L. (1998). Human rights law and freedom of association: Development through ILO supervision. International Labour Review 137(2).

De Tocqueville, A. (2015). Democracy in America – Vol. 1. Forgotten Books.

Walzer, M. (1995). The Civil Society Argument. In Mouffe, C. (ed.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy (pp. 89-107). London – New York: Verso.

Walzer, M. (1998). On Involuntary Association. In Gutmann, A. (ed.), Freedom of Association (pp. 35-63). Princeton-Chichester: Princeton University Press.

Warren, M.E. (2001). Democracy and Association. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Windridge, O. (2015). A watershed moment for African human rights: Mtikila & Others v Tanzania at the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights. African Human Rights Law Journal 15(2).

Legal sources

Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina (https://www.ustavnisud.ba/ public/down/USTAV_ BOSNE_I_HERCEGOVINE_engl.pdf)

Constitution of the Republic of North Macedonia (https://www.sobranie.mk/the-constitution-of-the-republic-of-macedonia-ns_article-constitution-of-the-republic-of-north-macedonia. nspx)

Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 1/94, 13/97, 16/02, 22/02, 52/02, 60/02, 18/03, 63/03, 9/04, 20/04, 33/04, 71/05, 72/05, 88/08.

Constitution of the Italian Republic (https://www.senato.it/documenti/repository/ istituzione/costituzione_inglese.pdf)

Constitution of the Republic of Srpska, Official Gazette of Republic Srpska, no. 6/92, 8/92, 15/92, 19/92, 21/92, 28/94, 8/96, 13/96, 15/96, 16/96, 21/96, 21/02, 26/02, 69/02, 31/03, 98/03, 115/05, 117/05, 48/11.

Constitution of the Slovak Republic (https://www.prezident.sk/upload-files/46422.pdf)

European Charter on the statute for judges (https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp? p=&id=1766485&direct=true)

Decision no. U-86/14 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Srpska (http://www.ustavnisud.org/ database/pdf/U-86_14.pdf)

Judges' Charter in Europe (https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Judges-charter-in-europe.pdf)>

Magna Carta of Judges (https://rm.coe.int/16807482c6)

Maestri v. Italy, App. 39748/98, European Court of Human Rights [2004]

N.F. v. Italy, App. 37119/97, European Court of Human Rights [2001]

Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe: „ Judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities“ (https://rm.coe.int/16807096c1)

Salaman v. The United Kingdom, App. 43505/98, European Court of Human Rights [2000]

The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (https://www.unodc.org /pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalore_principles.pdf)

The Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary (https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/basic-principles-independence -judiciary)

The Code of Judicial Ethics of Bosnia and Herzegovina (https://vstv.pravosudje.ba/)>

The European Convention of Human Rights (https://www.ustavnisud.ba/en/european-convention-on-human-rights)>

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (https://www.ohchr.org/ sites/default/files/ccpr.pdf)

The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (https://www.ohchr.org/ sites/default/files/cescr.pdf)

The Judiciary System Act of the Republic of Bulgaria (http://www.vss.justice.bg/ en/root/f/upload/5/judiciary_system_act.pdf)

The Law on Associations and Foundations of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 32/01, 42/03, 63/08, and 76/11.

The Law on Associations and Foundations of Brcko District, Official Gazette of Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 41/20.

The Law on Associations and Foundations of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 45/02.

The Law on Associations and Foundations of the Republic of Srpska, Official Gazette of Republic Srpska, no. 52/01 and 42/05.

The Law on Courts of Brcko District, Official Gazette of Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 12/20 – refined text.

The Law on Courts of the Republic of Croatia, Official Gazette, no. 28/13, 33/15, 82/15, 82/16, 67/18, 126/19, 130/20, 21/22, and 60/22.

The Law on High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council, Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 25/2004, 93/2005, and 48/2007.

The Minimum Standards of Judicial Independence (https://www.ibanet.org/MediaHandler? id=bb019013-52b1-427c-ad25-a6409b49fe29)

The Statute of the Brcko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina (chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://skupstinabd.ba/images/dokumenti/ba/statut-brcko-distrikta.pdf)>

The Statute of the Association of Judges of the Republic of Srpska (https://udruzenjesudijars.org/images/stories/pravni-akti/status/statut-i-preciscen-tekst-111115.pdf)>

The Universal Charter of the Judge (https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/IAJ-Universal-Charter-of-the-Judge-instruments-1989-eng.pdf)>

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights)>

Online sources

BBC News. Call to uncover freemason judges. BBC News (12 October, 2000). Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/969317.stm (Accessed on 10 September, 2022).

 

Published
2022/12/15
Section
Original Scientific Paper