INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT IN ALTERNATIVE CARE: FOSTER CARE AND COVID-19 PANDEMICS

  • GORDANA HORVAT Faculty of Law Osijek
  • Suzana Tomašević
  • Ana Lozina Faculty of Law Osijek
Keywords: alternative care, foster care, social welfare, institutions, support, Covid-19

Abstract


The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic has generated new challenges in the work of social welfare institutions, particularly in the area of providing support in alternative forms of care, such as foster care. The need for support during the pandemic was very significant and necessary because foster families fall into the category of vulnerable groups, especially because they provide care for children displaced from their primary (biological) family. In addition to insufficient institutional support during the pandemic, communication with primary families was aggravated, which has had a negative impact on foster children and their needs. the Faculty of Law in Osijek is a partner institution in the project “Zajedno do doma”, funded by the EU and organized by the World Youth Federation Croatia. For the project purposes, a survey on institutional support to foster families was conducted from August to October 2021. The collected data will be presented and analyzed in this paper, in order to identify the needs of foster families, the relevant forms of institutional support, and the difficulties that foster families experience in case of insufficient support. This pilot research on the attitudes of experts and foster careers is a quantitative basis for further qualitative research on foster care in direct contact with foster carers. Based on this research, the authors have developed foster care guidelines, with special emphasis on the challenges of providing support during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Author Biography

Ana Lozina, Faculty of Law Osijek

Ana Lozina, mag.act. soc.,

Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Osijeku,

Republika Hrvatska

References

Barber, J. G., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2004). Children in foster care. Routledge.

Bernedo, I.M., Oliver, J., Urbano-Contreras, A. & Gonzalez-Pasarin, L. (2022). Perceived stress, resources and adaptation in relation to the COVID-19 lockdown in Spanish foster and non-foster families. Child & family social work, 27(1), 55-66. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12871

Bežovan, G., Bratoš, P., Mrdeža Bajs, I., Baturina, D., Matančević, J. i Pandžić, J. (2021). Izazovi nošenja sa socijalnim učinkom COVID - 19 krize i potresa u Gradu Zagrebu. Centar za razvoj neprofitnih organizacija.

https://www.zagreb.hr/userdocsimages/arhiva/socijalna_skrb/2021%20razno/Socijalna%20slika%20Grada%20Zagreba%202019.-2020..pdf>

Brajša-Žganec, A. i Kaliterna Lipovčan, Lj. (2006). Kvaliteta življenja, životno zadovoljstvo i sreća osoba koje profesionalno pomažu drugima. Društvena istraživanja, 15(4-5), 713-728. https://hrcak.srce.hr/10874>

Chapman, M., Wall, A. & Barth, R. P. (2004). Children’s voices: The perceptions of children in foster care. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 74 (3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.74.3.293>

Dobrotić, I. (2016). Razvoj i poteškoće sustava skrbi za starije osobe u Republici Hrvatskoj. Društvena istraživanja, 25(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.5559/di.25.1.02

Dominelli, L. (2021). A green social work perspective on social work during the time of COVID-19. International journal of social welfare, 30(1), 7-16. doi: 10.1111/ijsw.12469

 

Družić Ljubotina, O., Kletečki Radović, M. i Jelača, N. (2005). Socio-demografska obilježja i iskustva udomiteljskih obitelji. Ljetopis socijalnog rada, 12(1), 89-105. https://hrcak.srce.hr/2787

Herenčić, M. i Mihanović, V. (2006). Kvalitativna analiza udomiteljstva djece s teškoćama u Republici Hrvatskoj - stanje i perspektive. Udruga za promicanje inkluzije Zagreb. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/percepcija-majki-o-ukljucenosti-clanova-obitelji/docview/1556314133/se-2>

Johnson, P. R., Yoken, C. & Voss, R. (1995). Family foster care placement: The child’s perspective. Child Welfare: Journal of Policy, Practice, and Program. 74 (5). 959-974. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-07885-001>

Jordan, B. (2012). Individualisation, liberal freedom and social work in Europe. Dialogue in praxis, 14(1), 7-25. http://dialogueinpraxis.net/index.php?a=article&aid=10&id=5

Laklija, M. (2011). Pristupi udomiteljskoj skrbi za djecu u svijetu i čimbenici koji utječu na ishode udomiteljstva. Revija za socijalnu politiku, 18(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v18i3.1020

Laklija, M. i Sladović Franz, B. (2013). Individualni plan skrbi za dijete u udomiteljskoj obitelji. Sirius- Centar za psihološko savjetovanje, edukaciju i istraživanje. https://centar-sirius.hr/-/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/prirucnik_Individualni-plan-skrbi-za-dijete-u-udomiteljskoj-obitelji.pdf

MacGregor, T. E., Rodger, S., Cummings, A. L. & Leschied, A. W. (2006). The needs of foster parents: A qualitative study of motivation, support, and retention. Qualitative Social Work, 5 (3), 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325006067365>

Maclay, F., Bunce, M. & Purves, D. (2006). Surviving the system as a foste carer. Adoption and Fostering, 30 (1), 29-38. DOI: 10.1177/030857590603000105

Mešl, N. i Leskošek, V. (2021). Delovanje centrov za socialno delo v času prvega in drugega vala epidemije covida-19. Socialno delo, 60(3), 233-251. doi: 10.51741/sd.2021.60.3.233-251

Metcalfe, F. & Humphreys, C. (2002). Fostering action research and action research in fostering. Qualitative Social Work, 1(4), 435-450. DOI: 10.1177/14733250260620856

Morgan, K., & Baron, R. (2011). Challenging behaviour in looked after young people, feelings of parental self-efficacy and psychological well-being in foster carers. Adoption & Fostering Journal, 35(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308575911035001>

Pecora, P. J. & Maluccio, A. N. (2000). What works in family foster care. U M. P. Kluger, G. Alexander, & P. A. Curtis (Ur.), What works in child welfare, 139-155. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.

Sabolić, T. i Vejmelka, L. (2015). Udomiteljstvo djece u Hrvatskoj iz perspektive udomitelja i stručnjaka. Holon, 5 (1), 6-42.  https://hrcak.srce.hr/140394>

Sladović Franz, B. i Mujkanović, Đ. (2003). Izdvajanje djece iz obitelji kao mjera socijalne skrbi. Ljetopis socijalnog rada, 10(2), 229-242.  https://hrcak.srce.hr/3514>

Štambuk, A. i Penava Šimac, M. (2021). Prikaz udomiteljstva kao oblika skrbi za osobe starije životne dobi u Hrvatskoj. Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istraživanja, 57(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.31299/hrri.57.2.8

Šućur, Z. (2003). Razvoj socijalne pomoći i socijalne skrbi u Hrvatskoj nakon drugog svjetskog rata. Revija za socijalnu politiku, 10(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v10i1.137

The World Bank (2019). Regionalna dostupnost socijalnih usluga u Hrvatskoj. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/276741604615006394-0080022020/original/13Regionalnadostupnostsocijalnihusluga.pdf>

Thoburn, J. (2009). Reunification of children in out-of-home care to birth parents or relatives: A synthesis of the evidence on processes, practice and outcomes. Deutsches Jugendinstitut. https://www.dji.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pkh/expertise_dji_thoburn_reunification.pdf>

Wilson, K., Sinclair, I., Taylor, C., Pithouse, A. & Sellick, C. (2004). Fostering success. An exploration of the research literature in foster care. Social Care Institute for Excellence.

Zakon o udomiteljstvu. Narodne novine 115/18, 18/22. https://www.zakon.hr/z/485/Zakon-o-udomiteljstvu

Žižak, A., Koller-Trbović, N., Jeđud Borić, I., Maurović, I., Mirosavljević, A. i Ratkajec Gašević, G. (2012). Što nam djeca govore o udomiteljstvu. Ured UNICEF-a za Hrvatsku. https://www.unicef.hr/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Sto_nam_djeca_govore_o_udomiteljstvu.pdf

Published
2023/03/30
Section
Original Scientific Paper