Unilateral Annulment of Marriage in Ancient Rome

  • Imran Rašljanin Državni Univerzitet u Novom Pazaru
Keywords: repudium, matrimonium cum manu, matrimonium sine manu, unilateral annulment of marriage

Abstract


The subject matter of this paper is unilateral annulment of marriage from the perspective of Roman law. In the Roman legal system, this institute was known as repudium. Repudiation was present both in matrimonium cum manu and in matrimonium sine manu. In matrimonium cum manu, repudiation was allowed only to men; in matrimonium sine manu, it was allowed to women as well. In this paper, the author examines the form, the requirements and repercussions of repudium in Roman law. The paper also considers the role of the paterfamilias, who had enormous power in the first half of the Roman Republic. Marriage could not take place without the consent of the paterfamilias; thus, it would be null and void ab initio in compliance with the rule quad nullum est nullum producit effectum. The liberalization of marital relations gradually contributed to reducing the role of the paterfamilias. Ultimately, repudiation resulted in a huge number of divorces. Such practices were perceived as a social problem by a number of Roman emperors, who tried to counteract the negative phenomenon by enacting relevant legislation.

References

ЛИТЕРАТУРА:

 

1)     Adolf Berger - Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law (Transaction of the American Philosophical Society) -American Philosophical Society, Volume 43, part 2, City College and French University, New York, 1953.

2)     Andrew Bikrak, Marriage in Roman law, Yale Law Journal, Volume XVI, number 5, 1907.

3)     Andrew M. Riggsby - Roman law and the legal world of the Romans, Cambridge University Press, University of Texas at Austin, 2010

4)     David Johnston - Roman Law in Context, Cambridge University Press, London, 1999.

5)     Edward Poste, Institutes of Roman Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford, Fourth Edition, London, 1904.

6)     George Mousourakis, Fundamentals of Roman Private Law, Springer, Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012

7)     George Mousourakis, Roman Law and the Origins of the Civil Law Tradition, Springer International Publishing, London, 2015

8)     Ju Evans Grubbs, Women and the Law in the Roman Empire - A Sourcebook on Marriage, Divorce and Widowhood, Routledge, London and New York, 2002.

9)     Leopold Wenger, Dr. Wolfgang Kunkel, Römisches Recht - Römisches Privatrecht - Abriss des Römischen Zivilprozessrechts, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1949.

10) Max Kaser, Roman private lawa translation, Fourh edition, University of South Africa, Pretoria, 1984.

11) Антун Меланица, Наташа Деретић, Римско право, десето издање, Правни факултет у Новом саду, Нови Сад, 2011.

12) Жика Бујуклић, Римско приватно право, Правни факултет у Београду, Пето измењено издање, Београд, 2015.

13) Обрад Станојевић, Римско право, треће допуњено издање, Београд, 1989.

НАУЧНИ РАДОВИ:

1)     Марија Игњатовић, Capacitas iuridica i status familiae у римском праву, Зборник радова Правног факултета у Нишу, вол. 57. бр. 78.

2)     Марија Игњатовић, Да ли римски свадбени обичаји живе и данас?, Годишњак факултета правних наука, Година 1, Број 1, 2011. Бања Лука.

3)     Марија Игњатовић, Тања Китановић, Споразумни развод брака у римском и савременом праву, Зборник радова Правног факултета у Новом Саду, 2/2013.

 

Published
2024/07/04
Section
Review Paper