From Restriction of Freedom of Movement to Deprivation of Liberty of Persons in need of International Protection: Compliance of Serbian legislation with the European Court of Human Rights standards

  • Aleksandra Kastratović doktorand Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu
Keywords: international protection, restriction of freedom of movementm, deprivation of liberty, European Court of Human Rights, Serbian legislation

Abstract


Persons in need of international protection are already in difficult situation due to their uncertain legal status. Until their legal status is determined, their freedom of movement can be restricted. However, the problem arises because such simple restriction of their movement can amount to deprivation of their liberty. The aim of the paper is to determine when and under what conditions can restriction on freedom of movement amount to deprivation of liberty, whether the difficult possition of persons in need of international protection is taken into account, and whether Serbian legislation implements relevant standards established in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The analysis suggests that, based on the provision of the Law on Asylum and Temporary Protection concerning restriction of freedom of movement of asylum seekers, there could be a practical problen. Although Serbian legislation qualifies the retention of foreigners and asylum seekers in Shelter for Foreigners as a measure of restriction of movement, such situation can be inherent to deprivation of their liberty. Because of this remark, the author proposes necessary changes at the legislative level.

References

Књиге и чланци у стручним часописима
Goodwin - Gill, G. S. (1986). The Detention of Non-Nationals, with Particular Reference to Refugees and Asylum-Seekers. Defense of the Alien. Vol. 9. 138–151.
European Court of Human Rights Council of Europe. (2020). Guide on Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights - Right to liberty and security.
Давинић, М. Крстић, И. (2019). Водич за примену релевантних прописа у области азила и миграција. Београд: Група 484.
Edwards, A. (2013) Detention under scrutiny. Forced Migration Review. Vol. 44. 4-6.
Könönen, J. (2020). Legal geographies of irregular migration: An outlook on immigration detention. Population, Space and Place. Vol. 26. 1–11.
Крстић, И. Маринковић, Т. (2016). Европско право људских права, Београд: Савет Европе.
Lalić Novak, G. (2013). Ogranicenje slobode kretanja trazitelja azila: zastitna mjera ili kazna?. Pravni vjesnik, Vol. 29. 139–156.
Међународна комисија правника. (2017). Миграције и међународно право људских права, Водич за практичаре бр. 6. Београд: Београдски центар за људска права.
Mole, N. Крстић, И. Papadouli, M. Чучковић, Б. Tidona, A. Waddell, O. (2018). Приручник о међународним и европским стандардима у области азила и миграција – поглед изблиза на нека конкретна питања. Београд: АИРЕ Центар и Међународна организација за миграције.
O’Nions, H. (2008). No Right to Liberty: The Detention of Asylum Seekers for Administrative Convenience. European Journal of Migration and Law. Vol. 10. 149–185.
Hailbronner, K. (2007). Detention of asylum seekers. European Journal of Migration and Law. Vol. 9. 159–172.
Costello, C. (2015). Immigration Detention: The Grounds Beneath Our Feet. Current Legal Problems. Vol. 68. 143–177.
Судска пракса и домаћи инструменти
ECtHR, Guzzardi v. Italy, Application no. 7367/76, Judgment of 6 November 1980.
ECtHR, Raimondo v. Italy, Application no. 12954/87, Judgment of 22 February 1994.
ECtHR, Amuur v. France, Application no. 19776/92, Judgment of 25 June 1996.
ECtHR, Foka v. Turkey, Application no. 28940/95, Judgment of 26 January 2008.
ECtHR, Nolan And K. v. Russia, Application no. 2512/04, Judgment of 6 July 2009.
ECtHR, M.S.S. v. Belgium And Greece, Application no. 30696/09, Judgment of 21 January 2011.
ECtHR, Khlaifia And Others v. Italy, Application no. 16483/12, Judgment of 1 September 2015.
ECtHR, A.S. v. Switzerland, Application no. 39350/13, Judgment of 30 November 2015.
ECtHR, De Tommaso v. Italy, Application no. 43395/09, Judgment of 23 February 2017.
ECtHR, Kasparov v. Russia, Application no. 53659/07, Judgment of 6 March 2017.
ECtHR, Ilias And Ahmed v. Hungary, Application no. 47287/15, Judgment of 14 March 2017.
ECtHR, Ilias And Ahmed v. Hungary, Application no. 47287/15, Judgment of 21 November 2019 (Grand Chamber).
Конвенција за заштиту људских права и основних слобода, European Court of Human Rights Council of Europe, 4. новембар 1950.
Протокол 4 уз Конвенцију за заштиту људских права и основних слобода којим се обезбеђују извесна права и слободе која нису укључена у Конвенцију и први протокол уз њу, European Court of Human Rights Council of Europe, 16. септембар 1963.
Закон о азилу и привременој заштити, „Службени гласник РС“, бр. 24/2018.
Закон о странцима, „Службени гласник РС“, бр. 24/2018 и 31/2019.
Правилник о кућном реду и правилима боравка у прихватилишту за странце, „Службени гласник РС“, бр. 42/2018.
Published
2024/07/04
Section
Review Paper