DATA RETENTION IN CJEU CASE LAW

  • Tatjana Bugarski
  • Milana Pisarić Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu
Keywords: criminal procedure, data retention, European Union, CJEU

Abstract


Possession of accurate, complete and reliable relevant data on electronic communications traffic and timely access of authorized competent state bodies to such data is without a doubt a useful tool in the fight against modern forms of crime. For that reason, it is justified to establish an obligation for providers of electronic communications services to keep certain data on communications for a certain period of time in the realization of which they mediate and to hand over that data at the request of authorized state bodies, in order to use them for legitimate purposes. For this reason, the Data Retention Directive was adopted in 2006, which Member States were required to transpose into national law. However, data retention poses a risk to basic human rights and freedoms, if the regulation establishing this obligation does so without respecting the essence of these rights and freedoms, especially the right to privacy and rights related to the processing of personal data, for which reason the Court of Justice of the European Union declared the Directive invalid is 2014. Despite this decision, Member States continue to regulate the obligation to retain data in their national regulations. In this regard, the question of compliance of these regulations with the fundamental rights and freedoms and principles of the Union is raised. The subject of the paper is the analysis of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU on this issue after the annulment of the Data Retention Directive.

References

1. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 391–407), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT.
2. Conclusions of the Council of the European Union on Retention of Data for the Purpose of Fighting Crime, EUCO 8/17, 6 June 2019, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/23985/22-23-euco-final-conclusions.pdf.
3. Conclusions of the Council of the European Union on Retention of Data for the Purpose of Fighting Crime, 27 May 2019 (OR. en) 9663/19, https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-9663-2019-INIT/en/pdf.
4. Conclusions of the Council of the European Union, EUCO 13/18, 18 October 2018, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/36775/18-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdf.
5. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 47–390), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012E%2FTXT.
6. Council document 14319/18, Data retention - State of play, 23 November 2018, https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14319-2018-INIT/en/pdf.
7. Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ 2002 L 201, p. 37), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32002L0058.
8. Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC (OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p. 54–63), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/GA/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32006L0024.
9. Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services, Directive 2002/58/EC concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (OJ 2009 L 337, p. 11), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32009L0136&from=EN.
10. Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj.
11. European Commission statement/15/5654 on national data retention laws Brussels, 16 September 2015, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/STATEMENT_15_5654.
12. Guarascio F., EU executive plans no new data retention law, Reuters, 12.3.2015, https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-eu-data-telecommunications/eu-executive-plans-no-new-data-retention-law-idUSKBN0M82CO20150312.
13. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 6 October 2020 in Case C 623/17, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=232083&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=14904167.
14. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 April 2014 in Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12, Official Journal of the European Union, 10.6.2014, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/PDF/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.C_.2014.175.01.0006.01.ENG.
15. Judgment оf the Court (Grand Chamber) 2 October 2018 in Case C-207/16, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=206332&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=15767141.
16. Judgment оf the Court (Grand Chamber) 21 December 2016 in Joined Cases C 203/15 and C 698/15, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62015CJ0203&from=EN#t-ECR_62015CJ0203_EN_01-E0001.
17. Opinion оf Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 15 January 2020, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=222264&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=14896635.
18. Бугарски Т., Доказне радње у кривичном поступку, Нови Сад 2011.
19. Бугарски T., „Прислушкивање и задржавање телекомуникационих података“, Правни живот 9/2011, 837-853.
20. Писарић M, Електронски докази у кривичном поступку, Нови Сад 2019.
Published
2021/06/02
Section
Original Scientific Paper