Preispitivanje akademskog integriteta
Sažetak
Časopisi predstavljaju najvažnije sredstvo komunikacije između naučnika. Ključni faktor za ocenu naučnika danas jeste njihova naučna produktivnost. Da bi njihov naučni rad bio pozitivno ocenjen, neophodno je da naučnici objave određeni broj radova u časopisima indeksiranim u relevantnim komercijalizovanim bazama podataka (od kojih su najznačajniji Web of Science Core Collection i Scopus). Ono što je takođe važno jeste da su objavljeni članci visoko citirani. Ova preokupacija brojkama promenila je izdavačku kulturu i danas su naučnici više zaokupljeni time koliko i gde objavljuju, nego šta objavljuju. Rezultat je značajno povećanje broja časopisa i objavljenih radova, ali to povećanje ne mora da vodi do pozitivnog razvoja same nauke. Izdavački pritisak se često navodi kao razlog za nepošteno ponašanje. Ovaj rad istražuje neke od najvećih izazova u akademskoj zajednici danas: transparentnost i nepristranost procesa recenziranja, objavljivanje radova u predatorskim časopisima, rast broja radova nastalih u koautorstvu, pojavu tzv. plodnih autora, pisaca duhova i počasnih pisaca. U radu će se istražiti ovi izazovi u kontekstu hrvatskog Zakona o naučnoj delatnosti i visokom obrazovanju i Pravilnika o uslovima za izbor u naučna zvanja.
Reference
Christopher Baethge, “Publish Together or Perish. The Increasing Number of Authors per Article in Academic Journals Is the Consequence of a Changing Scientific Culture. Some Researchers Define Authorship Quite Loosely”, Dtsch Arztebl Int., 20/ 2008 380–383.
Jeffrey Beall, “Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals”, Ann R Coll Surg Engl., 2/ 2016; 77-79.
Gordana Cerjan Letica, Slaven Letica, “Znanstvena nedoličnost: kako se s njom nositi u Hrvatskoj?”, Acta Stomatologica Croatica, 2/2008, 117–122.
Alan Cook, „Academic Publications before 1940“, A Century of Science Publishing (ed. Einar H. Fredriksson), Amsterdam - Berlin 2001, 15-24.
Ivana Čadovska, Goranka Mitrović, “Uloga knjižnica u vrednovanju znanstvene produktivnosti: primjer nacionalne i sveučilišne knjižnice u Zagrebu”, Vjesnik bibliotekara Hrvatske 2/2018, 179-198.
Martina Čuljak, Lovela Machala Poplašen, “Usporedba citatnih baza na uzorku hrvatskih znanstvenika javnozdravstvene institucije: Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus i Google Scholar”, Vjesnik bibliotekara Hrvatske 1/2019, 129-150.
Eugene Garfield, “The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor”, JAMA, 1/ 2006, 90-93
A.Y. Gasparyan, B. Nurmashev, A. A. Voronov, A. N. Gerasimov, A. M. Koroleva, G. D. Kitas, “The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities”, J Korean Med Sci. 12/2016, 1874-1878.
Tom Ginsburg, Thomas J. Miles, “Empiricism and the Rising Incidence of Coauthorship in Law”, University of Illinois Law Review 2011, 1785-1826.
David A. Kronick, “Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism”, JAMA 10/1990, 1321-1322.
- S. Kwok, “The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism”, J Med Ethics 31/ 2005, 554–556.
Matko Marušić, Dario Sambunjak, Ana Marušić, “Vodič za ocjenu (recenziju)znanstvenog članka”, Pedijatrija danas 2/2006, 224-235
Niels Mejlgaard, Lex M. Bouter, George Gaskell, Panagiotis Kavouras, Nick Allum, Anna-Kathrine Bendtsen,
Costas A. Charitidis, Nik Claesen, Kris Dierickx, Anna Domaradzka, Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Nicole Foeger,
Maura Hiney, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Krishma Labib, Ana Marušić, Mads P. Sørensen, Tine Ravn, Rea Ščepanović, Joeri K. Tijdink, Giuseppe A. Veltri, “Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk”, Nature 586/2020, 358-360.
Jeffrey Overall, “Stop Drinking the Kool-Aid: The Academic Journal Review Process in the Social Sciences Is Broken, Let's Fix It”, Journal of Academic Ethics 3/ 2015), 277-289.
Padmapriya Padmalochanan, “Academics and the Field of Academic Publishing: Challenges and Approaches”, Pub Res Q 35/ 2019, 87–107.
- S. Sathyanarayana Rao, Chittaranjan Andrade, “The MMR vaccine and autism: Sensation, refutation, retraction, and fraud” Indian journal of psychiatry 2/2011, 95-6;
Daniel Sarewitz, “The pressure to publish pushes down quality”, Nature 533/2016, 147.
Elizabeth Wager, Sanjay Singhvi, Sabine Kleinert, “Too much of a good thing? An observational study of prolific authors” PeerJ. 2015, 1-5.
Pippa Smart, “Is the impact factor the only game in town?” Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 6/ 2015, 405-408.
Lawrence B. Solum, “Download it while it's hot: Open access and legal scholarship”, Lewis & Clark Law Review 4/ 2006.
Matthew C. Sonfield, “Academic Plagiarism at the Faculty Level: Legal Versus Ethical Issues and a Case Study”,
J Acad Ethics 12/2014, 75–87.
Jadranka Stojanovski, Elias Sanz-Casado, Tommaso Agnoloni, Ginevra Peruginelli, “Peer Review in Law Journals”, Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6 /2021, 1-14.
Sanja S. Strgar, Maja S. Vukadinović, “Legal Aspects of Scientific Misconduct: Causes and Possible Solutions”, Ethical Perspectives, 1 /2018, 117-141.
Jaap de Vries, “Peer Review: The Holy Cow of Science”, A Century of Science Publishing (ed. Einar H. Fredriksson), Amsterdam - Berlin 2001, 231 – 244.
Michael L. Voight, Barbara J. Hoogenboom, “Publishing your work in a journal: understanding the peer review process”, Int J Sports Phys Ther. 5/2012, 452–460.
Pravni akti
Zakon o znanosti i visokom obrazovanju, Narodne novine, br. 123/2003, 198/2003, 105/2004, 174/2004, 02/2007, 46/2007, 45/2009, 63/2011, 94/2013, 139/2013, 101/2014, 60/2015, 131/2017.
Pravilnik o uvjetima za izbor u znanstvena zvanja, Narodne novine, br. 28/2017.
Odluka o nužnim uvjetima za ocjenu nastavne i znanstveno-stručne djelatnosti u postupku izbora u znanstveno-nastavna zvanja, Narodne novine, br. 122/2017.
Internet izvori
Beall's List of Potential Predatory Journals and Publishers, https://beallslist.net/, 12. april 2022.
Co-authorship in the Humanities and Social Sciences A global view, https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Coauthorship-white-paper.pdf, 10. april 2022.
Emerald Publishing, Article withdrawal & correction, https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/publish-with-us/author-policies/article-withdrawal-correction, 15. januar 2022.
Etički kodeks Sveučilišta u Osijeku, file:///D:/Downloads/eticki-kodeks-sveucilista-josipa-jurja-strossmayera-2011.pdf, 25. marta 2022.
Smriti Mallapaty, Paper authorship goes hyper, A single field is behind the rise of thousand-author papers, https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/paper-authorship-goes-hyper, 30 januar 2022.
Richard Van Noorden, Global scientific output doubles every nine years, http://blogs.nature.com/news/2014/05/global-scientific-output-doubles-every-nine-years.html., 7. april 2022.
Catherine Offord, “German Scientists Frequently Publish in Predatory Journals”, https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/german-scientists-frequently-publish-in-predatory-journals-64518, 11. april 2022.
Open Researcher and Contributor ID, http://orcid.org, 25. april 2022
Elizabeth Redden, Stepping Out of the Rat Race, go.nature.com/3itv56b, 20. april 2022.
The Royal Society Publishing, About Philosophical Transactions,
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rstl/about, 24. april 2022.
Think. Check. Submit, https://thinkchecksubmit.org/about/, 11. Mart 2022, 24. april 2022.