Rethinking Academic Integrity
Abstract
Scientific journals represent the most important tool of communication between scientists. The key factor for the evaluation of scientists is their scientific productivity. In order for their scientific work to be positively evaluated, it is necessary for scientists to publish a considerable number of papers in journals indexed in relevant commercial databases (of which the most important are the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus). What also matters is that the published articles are highly cited. This preoccupation with numbers has changed the publishing culture and today, scientists are more preoccupied with how much and where they publish than with what they publish. The result is a significant increase in the number of journals and published papers, but this increase does not necessarily lead to the growth of science itself. Publishing pressure is often cited as a reason for scientific misconduct. This paper explores some of the biggest challenges in academia today: transparency and impartiality of the peer review process, publication of papers in predatory journals, growth of co-authorship, prolific authors, ghost writers and honorary writers. The paper will explore these challenges in the context of the Croatian Scientific Activity and Higher Education Act and the Ordinance on Academic Promotion and Advancement Requirements and Proceedings.
References
Christopher Baethge, “Publish Together or Perish. The Increasing Number of Authors per Article in Academic Journals Is the Consequence of a Changing Scientific Culture. Some Researchers Define Authorship Quite Loosely”, Dtsch Arztebl Int., 20/ 2008 380–383.
Jeffrey Beall, “Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals”, Ann R Coll Surg Engl., 2/ 2016; 77-79.
Gordana Cerjan Letica, Slaven Letica, “Znanstvena nedoličnost: kako se s njom nositi u Hrvatskoj?”, Acta Stomatologica Croatica, 2/2008, 117–122.
Alan Cook, „Academic Publications before 1940“, A Century of Science Publishing (ed. Einar H. Fredriksson), Amsterdam - Berlin 2001, 15-24.
Ivana Čadovska, Goranka Mitrović, “Uloga knjižnica u vrednovanju znanstvene produktivnosti: primjer nacionalne i sveučilišne knjižnice u Zagrebu”, Vjesnik bibliotekara Hrvatske 2/2018, 179-198.
Martina Čuljak, Lovela Machala Poplašen, “Usporedba citatnih baza na uzorku hrvatskih znanstvenika javnozdravstvene institucije: Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus i Google Scholar”, Vjesnik bibliotekara Hrvatske 1/2019, 129-150.
Eugene Garfield, “The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor”, JAMA, 1/ 2006, 90-93
A.Y. Gasparyan, B. Nurmashev, A. A. Voronov, A. N. Gerasimov, A. M. Koroleva, G. D. Kitas, “The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities”, J Korean Med Sci. 12/2016, 1874-1878.
Tom Ginsburg, Thomas J. Miles, “Empiricism and the Rising Incidence of Coauthorship in Law”, University of Illinois Law Review 2011, 1785-1826.
David A. Kronick, “Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism”, JAMA 10/1990, 1321-1322.
- S. Kwok, “The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism”, J Med Ethics 31/ 2005, 554–556.
Matko Marušić, Dario Sambunjak, Ana Marušić, “Vodič za ocjenu (recenziju)znanstvenog članka”, Pedijatrija danas 2/2006, 224-235
Niels Mejlgaard, Lex M. Bouter, George Gaskell, Panagiotis Kavouras, Nick Allum, Anna-Kathrine Bendtsen,
Costas A. Charitidis, Nik Claesen, Kris Dierickx, Anna Domaradzka, Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Nicole Foeger,
Maura Hiney, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Krishma Labib, Ana Marušić, Mads P. Sørensen, Tine Ravn, Rea Ščepanović, Joeri K. Tijdink, Giuseppe A. Veltri, “Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk”, Nature 586/2020, 358-360.
Jeffrey Overall, “Stop Drinking the Kool-Aid: The Academic Journal Review Process in the Social Sciences Is Broken, Let's Fix It”, Journal of Academic Ethics 3/ 2015), 277-289.
Padmapriya Padmalochanan, “Academics and the Field of Academic Publishing: Challenges and Approaches”, Pub Res Q 35/ 2019, 87–107.
- S. Sathyanarayana Rao, Chittaranjan Andrade, “The MMR vaccine and autism: Sensation, refutation, retraction, and fraud” Indian journal of psychiatry 2/2011, 95-6;
Daniel Sarewitz, “The pressure to publish pushes down quality”, Nature 533/2016, 147.
Elizabeth Wager, Sanjay Singhvi, Sabine Kleinert, “Too much of a good thing? An observational study of prolific authors” PeerJ. 2015, 1-5.
Pippa Smart, “Is the impact factor the only game in town?” Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 6/ 2015, 405-408.
Lawrence B. Solum, “Download it while it's hot: Open access and legal scholarship”, Lewis & Clark Law Review 4/ 2006.
Matthew C. Sonfield, “Academic Plagiarism at the Faculty Level: Legal Versus Ethical Issues and a Case Study”,
J Acad Ethics 12/2014, 75–87.
Jadranka Stojanovski, Elias Sanz-Casado, Tommaso Agnoloni, Ginevra Peruginelli, “Peer Review in Law Journals”, Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6 /2021, 1-14.
Sanja S. Strgar, Maja S. Vukadinović, “Legal Aspects of Scientific Misconduct: Causes and Possible Solutions”, Ethical Perspectives, 1 /2018, 117-141.
Jaap de Vries, “Peer Review: The Holy Cow of Science”, A Century of Science Publishing (ed. Einar H. Fredriksson), Amsterdam - Berlin 2001, 231 – 244.
Michael L. Voight, Barbara J. Hoogenboom, “Publishing your work in a journal: understanding the peer review process”, Int J Sports Phys Ther. 5/2012, 452–460.
Pravni akti
Zakon o znanosti i visokom obrazovanju, Narodne novine, br. 123/2003, 198/2003, 105/2004, 174/2004, 02/2007, 46/2007, 45/2009, 63/2011, 94/2013, 139/2013, 101/2014, 60/2015, 131/2017.
Pravilnik o uvjetima za izbor u znanstvena zvanja, Narodne novine, br. 28/2017.
Odluka o nužnim uvjetima za ocjenu nastavne i znanstveno-stručne djelatnosti u postupku izbora u znanstveno-nastavna zvanja, Narodne novine, br. 122/2017.
Internet izvori
Beall's List of Potential Predatory Journals and Publishers, https://beallslist.net/, 12. april 2022.
Co-authorship in the Humanities and Social Sciences A global view, https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Coauthorship-white-paper.pdf, 10. april 2022.
Emerald Publishing, Article withdrawal & correction, https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/publish-with-us/author-policies/article-withdrawal-correction, 15. januar 2022.
Etički kodeks Sveučilišta u Osijeku, file:///D:/Downloads/eticki-kodeks-sveucilista-josipa-jurja-strossmayera-2011.pdf, 25. marta 2022.
Smriti Mallapaty, Paper authorship goes hyper, A single field is behind the rise of thousand-author papers, https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/paper-authorship-goes-hyper, 30 januar 2022.
Richard Van Noorden, Global scientific output doubles every nine years, http://blogs.nature.com/news/2014/05/global-scientific-output-doubles-every-nine-years.html., 7. april 2022.
Catherine Offord, “German Scientists Frequently Publish in Predatory Journals”, https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/german-scientists-frequently-publish-in-predatory-journals-64518, 11. april 2022.
Open Researcher and Contributor ID, http://orcid.org, 25. april 2022
Elizabeth Redden, Stepping Out of the Rat Race, go.nature.com/3itv56b, 20. april 2022.
The Royal Society Publishing, About Philosophical Transactions,
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rstl/about, 24. april 2022.
Think. Check. Submit, https://thinkchecksubmit.org/about/, 11. Mart 2022, 24. april 2022.