CRITERION OF CONTROL AND THE RIGHT OF STANDING OF A JURIDICAL PERSON IN ICSID ARBITRATION
Abstract
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (Centre or ICSID) was established for resolving disputes between foreign investors and host States. This is why jurisdiction ratione personae of the Centre depends crucially on who can be considered as a foreign investor, i.e. which persons have right of standing to initiate arbitration based on the Washington Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States (the Convention). When a claimant is a juridical person, one of the issues causing a debate in arbitral practice concerns the significance of control over that entity – to what extant is jurisdiction of an ICSID tribunal affected by the fact that the entity is under direct or indirect control of the host State’s nationals. The paper examines the problem with regards two groups of cases that the Convention regulates separately. The first group concerns cases in which the role of a claimant belongs to juridical persons nominally holding the nationality of other Contracting States of the Convention. The other category relates to the cases of claims submitted by local entities against their own State.
References
2. C. Schreuer, L. Malintoppi, A. Reinisch, A. Sinclair, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, 2nd edition, Oxford, 2009.
3. C. Schreuer, R. Dolzer, Principles of International Investment Law, 2nd edition, Oxford, 2012.
4. A. R. Parra, The History of ICSID, 2nd edition, Oxford, 2017.
5. A. Sinclair, ICSID’s Nationality Requirement, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, vol. 1/2008, 57-118.
6. J. Crawford, Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law, 9th edition, Oxford, 2019.
7. C. Brown, A. Rahman, Chapter 5: Juridical Persons and Requirements of the ICSID Convention, у књизи: C. Baltag, ICSID Convention After 50 Years, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2016.
8. K. Yannaca-Small, Who is Entitled to Claim?: The Definition of Nationality in Investment Arbitration, у књизи: K. Yanacca-Small (ed.), Arbitration Under International Investment Agreements: A Guide to the Key Issues, 2nd Edition, Oxford, 2018.
9. M. Stanivuković, ICSID i dvostrani sporazumi o zaštiti i unapređenju investicija Republike Srbije, у књизи: V. Rakić Vodinelić, G. Knežević (ured.), Liber Amicorum Dobrosav Mitrović, Beograd, 2007, 583-602.
10. C. Mclachlan (Меклахлан), L. Shore et al., International Investment Arbitration (Substantive Principles), 2nd edition, Oxford, 2017.
11. П. Ђундић, Процесне претпоставке за примену клаузуле о ускраћивању погодности у инвестиционој арбитражи: зашто је тешко рећи не?, Зборник радова Правног факултета у Новом Саду, том LIII, бр. 3/2019, 933-954.
12. C. Soule, The ICSID Convention and nationals of another contracting State that are owned by nationals of the respondent State: back to basics, Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem, 48/2015, 39-58.
13. L. Bastin, A. Lee, Venoklim Holding B.V. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, The American Journal of International Law, 4/2015, 858-865.
14. P. Tercier, N. T. Thang, Chapter 10: Criteria to Determine Investor Nationality (Juridical Persons)', у књизи: M. Kinnear, Geraldine R. Fischer et al. (eds), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2015.
15. B. Sabahi, N. Rubins et al., Investor – State Arbitration, 2nd edition, Oxford, 2019.
16. O. G. Repousis, Standing of Locally Incorporated Entities in International Investment Law and the Notion of “Foreign Control”, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 24, 2/2016, 327-349.