CHILD’S HABITUAL RESIDENCE IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Abstract
This article examines decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreting the concept of child’s habitual residence. The study of those decisions is essential for proper understanding of this key concept which appears in the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, the Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children, Protocol on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations, Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance and the Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption. Correct determination of the child’s habitual residence is a precondition for the correct and uniform application of these instruments which are all in force in Serbia.
Since 2007, the Court has been asked on numerous occasions to provide answers to questions that were raised regarding the interpretation of habitual residence. Out of this rich practice, four judgments have been selected for presentation and analysis (Case A, Case Mercredi, Case C v M and Case HR).The practice of the Court of Justice focuses on the circumstances that need to be taken into account by the judge in case the parties are in dispute about the child’s habitual residence and on the guiding principles for assessing the relative value of these circumstances.
Although the Court interprets the terms of Brussels II bis, those decisions have had significant and unifying impact on the interpretation of the Hague Child Protection Conventions, not only in the member states of the Union but also in other member states of the Hague conventions. The Court’s views have influenced the practice of the highest courts in Australia, Canada, UK and USA. It will therefore be of benefit to judges in Serbia to get acquainted with them and understand them, which is the main purpose of this article.
References
Beaumont, Paul; Holliday, Jayne. “Habitual Residence” In Child Abduction Cases: Hybrid Approach Is Now The Norm But How Much Weight Should Be Given To Parental Intention?. Liber Amicorum Monika Pauknerová. Magdalena Pfeiffer, Jan Brodec, Petr Bríza and Marta Zavadilová (eds.) Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2021.
Bordaš Bernadet, Deset godina primene Uredbe Brisel II bis, Zborni radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 2015, 1519-1537.
Dutta, Anatol. Habitual residence versus nationality -- In search of the European personal connecting factor in family matters, Private International Law in the Jurisprudence of European Courts – Family at Focus, ed. Mirela Župan. Osijek: Faculty of Law Osijek, 2015. 319-328.
Dželetović, Mirna. Pravni položaj deteta u situacijama njegovog nezakonitog odvođenja u zemlji i inostranstvu, doktorska disertacija. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu, 2021.
Köhler, Ben; Gulati, Rishi; John, Thomas. The Elgar Companion to the Hague Conference on Private International Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
Kovaček Stanić, Gordana. Porodičnopravni aspekti međunarodne, roditeljske otmice dece, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, tom 60, sveska 2, 2012, 74-94.
Kovaček Stanić, Gordana. Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: Insight from Serbia, Family Law Quarterly, Volume 48, Number 2, 2014, 283-296.
Krvavac, Marija; Belović, Jelena. Međunarodna otmica dece. Pravni život br. 10, 2017, 155-168.
Liefaard, Ton; Sloth-Nielsen, Julia; The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Brill, 2016,
Magnus, Ulrich; Mankowski. Peter. Brussels II Bis Regulation, Sellier, 2011.
Marjanović, Sanja, Some open issues in the application of the 1980 Child Abduction Convention in the Republic of Serbia, Private International Law in the Jurisprudence of European Courts – Family at Focus, ed. Mirela Župan. Osijek: Faculty of Law Osijek, 2015, 259-276.
Marjanović, Sanja. Međunarodna otmica dece – novine u međunarodnom privatnom pravu Srbije. Tematski zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu - Zaštita ljudskih i manjinskih prava u evropskom pravnom prostoru, tom 7, 2018, 131-145.
Morley, Jeremy D. The Hague Abduction Convention, 2nd edn. American Bar Association Publishing, 2016Đundić, Petar. Redovno boravište deteta u praksi primene Haške konvencije o građanskopravnim aspektima međunarodne otmice dece od 25. oktobra 1980. godine, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, broj 2, 2004, 551-570.
Palačković, Dušica. Konvencija o građanskopravnim aspektima međunarodne otmice dece: Procesnopravne implikacije, Pravni život, br. 11, 2012, 863-876.
Ponjavić, Zoran; Vlašković, Veljko. Space for the child’s best interests inside The Hague Convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction, Revija za evropsko pravo, broj 2-3, 2014, 45-67.
Stanivuković Maja. Đundić Petar. Pravo na viđanje deteta i Haška konvencija o građanskopravnim aspektima međunarodne otmice dece (1980), Pravni život, broj 10, 2010, 25-45.
Stanivuković, Maja. Bitka za decu – O Haškoj konvenciji o zaštiti dece, Revija za evropsko pravo, broj 2-3, 2018, 25-48.
Samardžić, Sandra. Potrebe i mogućnosti adekvatnijeg tumačenja Haške konvencije o građansko-pravnim aspektima međunarodne otmice dece u slučaju nasilja u porodici, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, tom 47, broj 1, 2013, 309-331.
Schuz, Rhona. The Child Abduction Convention: A Critical Analysis. Hart Publishing, 2013. Schuz, Rhona. The Hague Child Abduction Convention and Re-relocation disputes, International Journal of Law, Policy and The Family, 2021, 1-36.
Stanivuković, Maja; Živković, Mirko. Međunarodno privatno pravo, Opšti deo, šesto izdanje, Beograd, 2015.