FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, STRONG LANGUAGE AND PUBLIC SERVANTS

  • Sanja Đajić Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu
Keywords: freedom of expression, European Court of Human Rights, Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, civil servants, strong language, insult

Abstract


The aim of this contribution is to examine the scope of the freedom of expression of private persons in their encounters with public servants while the latter is on duty. Such situations are bound to happen quite often, sometimes accompanied with intemperance and strong language, so the relevance of the application of human rights to these encounters could potentially be significant. Discussion will be presented against the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in order to assess whether and to what extent freedom of expression protects against public servants. Given the tendency of the Court to set different scrutiny tests for different categories of expression, and to contextualize expressions and limitations imposed, the ambition of this contribution is to establish whether the Court has distilled a special set of rules for the use of strong language against civil servants while performing public duties. While a regular balancing exercise can include a variety of legitimate interests that potentially can limit freedom of expression, one particular interest will be singled out, that is the right to privacy of public servants and how the balancing of the right to the reputation of public servants with the freedom of expression of private persons can play out.

References

Literature


Aplin, Tanya, Jason Bosland, “The uncertain landscape of Article 8 of the ECHR: the protection of reputation as a fundamental human right?”, Comparative Defamation and Privacy Law (ed. Andrew T. Kenyon), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2016, 265-290


Barendt, Eric, Freedom of Speech, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1985


Boyle, Kevin, Sangeeta Shah, “Thought, Expression, Association, and Assembly”, International Human Rights Law (eds. Daniel Moeckli et al.), Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2010


Bychawska-Siniarska, Dominika, Protecting the Right to Freedom of Expression under the European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, 2017


Clooney, Amal, Philippa Webb, “The Right to Insult in International Law”, Columbia Human Rights Law, 2/2017, 1-55


European Court of Human Rights, Guide on Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights – Article 10, Council of Europe, 2021


Hertig Randall, Maya, "Commercial Speech under the European Convention on Human Rights: Subordinate or Equal," Human Rights Law Review, no. 1/2006, 53-86


Human Rights Committee, General Comment no. 34 (Article 19: Freedoms of opinion and expression), CCPR/C/GC/34, 12 September 2011


Leach, Phillip, Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011


Polymenopoulou, Eleni, “Does One Swallow Make a Spring? Artistic and Literary Freedom at the European Court of Human Rights”, Human Rights Law Review, 2016, 16, 511–539.


Reid, Karen, “Words in the workplace“, Freedom of Expression – Essay in honour of Nicolas Bratza (eds. Josep Casadevall et al.), Oisterwijk, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2012, 383-390


Schabas, William, The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016


 


European Court of Human Rights cases


Axel Springer AG v. Germany, App. no. 39954/08, Judgment (Grand Chamber) of 7 February 2012


Bezymyannyy v Russia, App. No. 10941/03, Judgment of 8 April 2010.


Čeferin v. Slovenia, App. no. 40975/08, Judgment of 16 January 2018


Garaudy v. France, App. No. 65831/01, Decision of 24 June 2003;


Gavrilovici v. Moldova, App. No. 25464/05, Judgment of 15 December 2009


Grebneva and Alisimchik v. Russia, App. No. 8918/05, Judgment of 22 November 2016


Gregoridades v. Greece, App. No. 24348/94, Judgment of 25 November 1997 (GC);


Grigoriades v. Greece, App. No. 24348/94, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 25 November 1997


Janowski v. Poland, App. No. 25716/94, GC, Judgment of 21 January 1999


Jerusalem v. Austria, App. no. 26958/95, Judgment of 27 February 2001


Kazakov v. Russia, App. No. 1758/02, Judgment of 18 December 2008.


Kazakov v. Russia, App. No. 1758/02, Judgment of 18 December 2008;


Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria (no. 3), App. No. 39069/97, Judgment of 11 December 2003.


Lešník v. Slovakia, App. no. 35640/97, Judgment of 11 March 2003.


Lewandowska-Malec v. Poland, App. No. 39660/07, Judgment of 18 September 2012


Lingens v. Austria, App. No. 9815/82, Judgment of 8 July 1986


Mariapori v. Finland, App. No. 37751/07, Judgment of 6 July 2010


Marin Kostov v. Bulgaria, App. No. 13801/07, Judgment of 24 July 2012;


Marinova and Others v. Bulgaria, App. Nos. 33502/07, 30599/10, 8241/11 and 61863/11, Judgment of 12 July 2016


Marinova and Others v. Bulgaria, App. Nos. 33502/07, 30599/10, 8241/11 and 61863/11, Judgment of 12 July 2016


Markt Intern Vergal GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, App. No. 10572, Judgment of 20 November 2009


Monnat v. Switzerland, App. No. 73604/01, Judgment of 21 December 2006,


Müller and Others v. Switzerland, App. No. 10737/84, Judgment 24 May 1988


Mustafa Erdoğan and Others v. Turkey, App. Nos.  346/04 and 39779/04, Judgment of 27 May 2014.


Mustafa Perinçek v. Switzerland, App. No. 27510/08, Judgment of 15 October 2015.


Nikula v. Finland, App. no. 31611/96, Judgment of 21 March 2002


Norwood v. The United Kingdom, App. No. 23131/03, Decision of 16 November 2004;


Raichinov v. Bulgaria, App. No. 47579/99, Judgment of 20 April 2006.


Sağdıç v. Turkey, App. no. 9142/16, Judgment of 9 February 2021


Sapan v. Turkey, App. No. 44102/04, Judgment of 8 June 2010;


Savitchi v. Moldova, App. No. 11039/02, Judgment of 11 October 2005;


Savva Terentyev v. Russia, App. no. 10692/09, Judgment of 28 August 2018


Sharanov and Palfreeman v. Bulgaria, App. Nos. 35365/12 & 69125/12, Judgment of 21 July 2016.


Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus, App. Nos. 32181/04 and 35122/05, Judgment of 21 July 2011.


Siryk v. Ukraine, App. no. 6428/07, Judgment of 31 March 2011


Skałka v. Poland, App. No.  43425/98, Judgment of 27 May 2003


Slomka v. Poland, App. no. 68924/12, Judgment of 6 December 2018


Sofranschi v. Moldova, App. No.  34690/05, Judgment of 21 December 2010


Sofranschi v. Moldova, App. no. 34690/05, Judgment of 21 December 2010


Sorguç v. Turkey, App. No. 17089/03, Judgment 23 June 2009


Syrik v. Ukraine, App. No. 6428/07, Judgment of 31 March 2001


Toranzo Gomez v. Spain, App. No. 26922/14, Judgment of 20 November 2018


Witzsch v. Germany (no. 2), App. No. 7485/03, Decision of 13 December 2005.


Yankov v. Bulgaria, App. no. 39084/97, Judgment of 11 December 2003


 

Published
2022/03/17
Section
Original Scientific Paper