HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION IN EMERGENCY CIRCUMSTANCES: SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF ARTICLE 15 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Abstract
This paper examines the legal framework for the protection of human rights in situations of extreme crisis in the European legal area, in order to achieve a coherent understanding of legal standards that will lead to their more uniform application. Through an in-depth analysis of the meaning and scope of the provisions of Article 15 of the European Convention, as well as the corresponding practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the authors determine under what conditions the suspension of certain rights and freedoms is legally permissible, and which state measures adopted in extraordinary circumstances represent the protection of the public interest, and which go beyond the scope of the most necessary measure required by the given situation and represent a violation of the rights and freedoms of the individual.
This work is based on the idea that specific limitations for the enjoyment of human rights are necessary and justified. It is a well-known that only a limited number of human rights are absolute and as such are immune to any restrictions regardless of the circumstances and justifications. However, this does not reduce the need for the measures that the state resorts to in times of crisis to be strictly controlled.
References
1. Дарко Симовић, Марко Станковић, Владан Петров, Људска права, Универзитет у Београду – Правни факултет, Београд 2018;
2. Anna-Lena Svensson-McCarthy, The International Law of Human Rights and States of Exception with special reference to the Travaux Preparatoires and Case-Law of the International Monitoring Organs, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague 1998;
3. Georges Abi-Saab, Foreword, The International Law of Human Rights and States of Exception with special reference to the Travaux Preparatoires and Case-Law of the International Monitoring Organs, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1998;
4. Christoph Schreuer, „Derogation of Human Rights in Situations of Public Emergency: The Experience of the European Convention on Human Rights“, Yale Journal of International Law 1982/9, 113 – 132;
5. Sarah Joseph, Jenny Schultz, Melissa Castan, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: cases, materials and commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000;
6. Richard Burchill, „When does an Emergency Threaten the Life of the Nation? Derogations from Human Rights Obligations and the War on International Terrorism“, New Zealand Yearbook of Jurisprudence 9/2005, 96 – 114;
7. Бранко М. Ракић, „Европски суд правде између људских права и борбе против тероризма – однос међународног и европског права“, Анали Правног факултета у Београду 2/2009, 155 – 185;
8. Stewart Waters, William B. Russell III, „The World War II Era and Human Rights Education“, Social Education 76(6)/2012, 301 – 305;
9. European Day of Remembrance for Victims of all Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2022/733610/EPRS_ATA(2022)733610_EN.pdf, 7.11.2022;
10. Dinah Shelton, Regional Protection of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, New York 2010;
11. Сања Ђајић, „Заштита људских права и слобода у пракси Европског суда за људска права – индивидуална заштита, тумачење Конвенције и ефикасност европског система“, Гласник Адвокатске коморе Војводине, вол. 73, 7-8/2001, 343 – 352;
12. Драгољуб Поповић, Европско право људских права, Службени гласник, Београд 2012;
13. Припремни текст о члану 15 Европске конвенције о људским правима (Preparatory work on article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights), European Commission of Human Rights, Council of Europe, Strasbourg 1956, Doc. DH (56) 4,
14. American Convention on Human Rights (Adopted at the Inter-American Specialized Conference on Human Rights, San José, Costa Rica, 22 November 1969);
15. Anna Dorota Gozdecka, „Human Rights During Pandemic: COVID-19 and Securisation of Health“, Nordic Journal of Human Rights vol. 39, 3/2021, 205 – 223;
16. Peter Kempees, „Hard Power“and the European Convention on Human Rights, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden – Boston, 2021;
17. Oren Gross, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin, „From Discretion to Scrutiny: Revisiting the Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Context of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights“, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 23, 3/2001, 625-649;
18. Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 332/57, Judgment of 1 July 1961, para 28. Лаулес против Ирске, Европски суд за људска права, представка број 332/57, пресуда од 1. јула 1961;
19. European Commission of Human Rights, Application No. 332/57 lodged by Gerard Richard Lawless against The Republic of Ireland, Report of the Commission (Adopted on 19th December 1959 ), A 51 .591,
20. The Greek Case, European Commission of Human Rights, Application no. 3321/67 - Denmark v. Greece, 3322/67 Norway v. Greece, 3323/67 Sweden v. Greece, 3344/67 Netherlands v. Greece, Report of the Sub-Commission 1967;
21. Mark W. Janis, Richard S. Kay, Anthony W. Bradley, European Human Rights Law, Oxford University Press, New York 2008,
22. A. and Others v. the United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, Application no 3455/05, Judgment of 19 February 2009, para 181. А и други против Уједињеног Краљевства, Европски суд за људска права, представка број 3455/05, пресуда од 19. фебруара 2009;
23. Marine Toullier, "The European Court of Human Rights' Control over States' Derogation in Time of Emergency: Example of Effectiveness of the Lessons Learned from WW2," International Comparative Jurisprudence 1/2017, 8 – 24;
24. Mohamed M. El Zeidy, „The ECHR and States of Emergency: Article 15-A Domestic Power of Derogation from Human Rights Obligations“, San Diego International Law Journal 4/2003, 277 – 318;
25. Ireland v. the United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 5310/71, Judgment of 18 January 1978. Ирска против Уједињеног Краљевства, Европски суд за људска права, представка број 5310/71, пресуда од 18. јануара 1978;
26. Brannigan and McBride v. the United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 14553/89; 14554/89, Judgment of 25 May 1993, para 66. Браниган и Мекбрајд против Уједињеног Краљевства, Европски суд за људска права, представка број 14553/89; 14554/89, пресуда од 25. маја 1993;
27. Брано Хаџи Стевић, „Тест пропорционалности у доба пандемије: људска права versus јавно здравље“, Страни правни живот 1/2023, 17-43;
28. Милан Пауновић, Славољуб Царић, Европски суд за људска права, Београд 2007;
29. Janneke Gerards, How to improve the necessity test of the European Court of Human Rights, I•CON (2013), Vol. 11 No. 2, 466–490;
30. Bernadette Rainey, Pamela McCormick, Clare Ovey, Jacobs, White and Ovey European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2021;
31. Резолуција Комитета министара (56) 16 од 26. септембра 1956. године, Resolution (56) 16 (26 September 1956) - (Adopted by the Ministers' Deputies) Convention on Human Rights - Interpretation and Application of Article 15, paragraph 3;
32. Application of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, European Commission of Human Rights, Application no. 176/56 by the Government of the Kingdom of Greece lodged against the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Report 1956;
33. European Commission of Human Rights, Application no. 8007/77 Cyprus against Turkey, Report 1983;
34. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 5), Notifications under Article 15 of the Convention in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/derogations-covid-19, 2. април 2023;
35. Notification - JJ9436C Tr./005-302 - 31 December 2022 - Withdrawal of a Derogation related to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 5);
36. Communauté genevoise d'action syndicale (CGAS) v. Switzerland, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 21881/20, Judgment of 15 March 2022;
37. Pešić v. Serbia, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 48973/20, communicated on 5 January 2023.