Specificities of Administrative Dispute and Constitutional Complaint Procedure

  • Savo D Manojlović Institute of Comparative Law
Keywords: Constitutional Complaint, Administrative Lawsuit, Constitutional Court

Abstract


 

The paper explores the unique characteristics of two important legal institutes: administrative lawsuits and constitutional complaints. Although these legal mechanisms can be generally described, their application in practice requires a nuanced understanding that goes beyond mere theoretical knowledge. The aim of the paper is to deepen both theoretical and practical understanding of these institutes by analyzing their specific internal structures, which distinguish them from other legal remedies.

The main thesis of the paper is supported by three sub-theses, highlighting the specificities of the procedures initiated by administrative lawsuits and constitutional complaints. These include their supra-institutional character, the subject of control, and the depth of analysis conducted during the decision-making process. The paper particularly focuses on legal systems where centralized administrative and constitutional courts function as separate institutions, while also considering systems where these functions are dispersed within the general judiciary.

The conclusion of the paper is that the administrative lawsuit, which historically precedes the constitutional complaint, shares significant "legal DNA" with it, making them distinct from other legal remedies and procedures. This connection underscores the administrative lawsuit as a precursor to the constitutional complaint in systems with centralized constitutional courts.

 

References

Albert Venn Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, London 1889;
Alec Stone Sweet, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe, Oxford University Press, 2000;
Brian Z. Tamanaha, On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2004;
Donald P. Kommers, Russell A. Miller, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 3rd ed., Duke University Press, 2012;
Дарио Ђерђа, “Нека рјешења новог уређења управног спора у Хрватској”, Зборник радова Правног факултета у Сплиту, 1/2010, 81-88;
Драган Милков, Појам управног акта (докторска дисертација), Нови Сад 1983;
E. Melichar, „Nadležnost ustavnog suda Austrije“, Prva konferencija evropskih ustavnih sudova, 1973;
Карел Рид, Европска конвенција о људским правима – водич за практичаре, Београд 2007;
Christoph Grabenwarter. Verfassungsrecht: Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit und Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit, 6. izdanje, Facultas Verlag, 2018;
Geoffrey R. Stone, Louis M. Seidman, Cass R. Sunstein, Mark V. Tushnet, and Pamela S. Karlan. Constitutional Law. 7th ed., Aspen Publishers, 2013;
Hans Kelsen, "Wer soll der Hüter der Verfassung sein?" (1929), Die Justiz, Vol. 6, 576-628.
Jan Komárek, "Constitutional Courts in Central and Eastern Europe: Between Adolescence and Maturity." International Journal of Constitutional Law 7.3, 2009;
Laurence H. Tribe, American Constitutional Law, 3rd edition, Foundation Press, New York 2000;
Mauro Cappelletti, The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective, Clarendon Press, 1989;
Otto Mayer, Deutsches Verwaltungsrecht, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 1895;
Paul Craig, Administrative Law, 8th edition, Sweet & Maxwell, London 2016;
Philip Bobbitt, Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic Questions, Oxford University Press, 2011
Предраг Трифуновић, „Судска одлука и уставна жалба“, Билтен судске праксе Врховног суда Србије 3/2009, 164-170.
René David, Les grands systèmes de droit contemporains, 4th edition, Dalloz, Paris 1992, 346-348.
Саво Манојловић, ”Правна природа и положај уставног суда у систему поделе власти”, Правни живот 14/2013;
Саво Манојловић, Појединачни политички акти (разграничење од управних аката), мастер рад, Београд 2008, (доступно на Правном факултету Универзитета у Београду);
Саво Манојловић, „Право на делотворне правно средство и члан 9. Закона о банкама”, Избор из судске праксе, 11/10, 13-17 и исти рад у: Право и привреда, 4-6/10, 197-208.
Stephen G. Breyer, et al., Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Text, and Cases, 7th edition, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, New York 2011;
Tom Ginsburg,"Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment," Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 3, 2007, pp. 61-81.
Зоран Томић, Опште управно право, Београд 2009, 342.
Зоран Томић, „Сукцесивност управне и управно-судске заштите“, Правни живот, бр.10/2007;
Зоран Томић, Коментар закона о управним споровим са судском праксом, Београд 2010.
Published
2025/01/21
Section
Original Scientific Paper