DETERMINING ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITION THROUGH INFRASTRUCTURAL TENETS
Abstract
Today, in the 21st century within the context of the neo-liberal market, architecture has become a tool of capital, demanding minimal investment with maximum spatial and environmental performance. Permanent changes that follow the rapid development of an information-based society imply an infrastructural take on the architectural composition, which has become increasingly programmatically unstable and market driven. Therefore today, an architectural composition traditionally understood as a set of part to-whole relations on three basic levels: form, function (program and its performance) and structure, can be perceived through the relations between volume, program range and infrastructure (which integrates the structural and performative aspects).
Beginning with the hypothesis that socio-economic changes alter the conceptions of infrastructure in the design process, and understanding ways to transform the architectural composition, a set of key historical moments and relations are established between the development of: architectural tools and methodologies, norms and policies of spatial and energy efficiencies, and understanding infrastructure as an omnipresent element within the architectural composition. In urban design and architectural design, two terms can be distinguished: infrastructural ground – a term that brings infrastructure closer to the architecture scale, and infrastructural tenets, which are methods in the design process used to evaluate the spatial efficiency and the capacities for programmatic change, determining the relation between transformations within the design process and those of a completed project. Therefore, a new design approach is needed to define the capacities of programmatic transformations that can follow different models: flexibility, performativity and process, while maintaining the optimal spatial efficiency.
The research showed that the choice of a transformational strategy depends on the program and envelope typologies to determine a project-specific infrastructural tenet – the layout of infrastructural elements which is located and quantified using the basic spatial efficiency parameters and indicators. As a launching point for further research, a theoretical matrix is proposed for four envelope typologies and three dominant program typologies, followed by a list of basic spatial efficiency parameters to loosely describe their infrastructural layouts.
References
Allen, S. (1999). Points +Lines. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Allen, S. (1998). Diagram matter, ANY 23: Data Mechanics for a topological age, New York: ANYcorp.
Arnheim, R. (1977). The Dynamics of Architectural Form. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Banham, R. (1965). A home is not a house, Art in America, Vol. 2, New York, 1965, pp. 70-79.
Bishop, C. (2006). Participation: Documents of Contemporary art, ed. Claire Bishop Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 9-18.
Busbea, L. (2007). Topologies: The Urban Utopia in France, 1960-1970. Cambridge: Mit Press, 2007.
De Graaf, R. (2017). Four walls and a roof, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Delalex, G. (2006). Go with the flow, Helsinki: University of Art and Design.
Easterling, K. (2014). Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space, New York: Verso.
Zaera Polo, A. (2008). The politics of the envelope - A Political Critique of Materialism, LOG, Vol. 17, pp.76-105.
Jerković – Babović, B., Rakonjac, I., Furundzić, D. (2020). Fluid spaces in a contemporary urban context: questioning the boundary between architecture and infrastructure, SPATIUM, Belgrade: IAUS. pp. 35-43.
Kipnis, J. (1996). Recent Koolhaas, El Croquis 83, 1996, pp. 26-37.
Koolhaas R., Mau B. (2000). SMLXL, Koln: Evergreen, 1997, pp. 335-350
Koolhaas R. (1978). Delirious New York, New York: The Monacelli press.
Koolhaas, R. (2003). Content, ed. Rem Koolhaas, Simon Brown, Koln: Tashen, 2003, pp. 162-171.
Kwinter, S. (2000). in SMLXL, (ed. Koolhaas, R. and Mau, B.), Koln: Evergreen, pp 500.
Latour, B., Yaneva, A. (2005). Give me a gun and I’ll make all the buildings move,
Oxford: Network theory.
Leatherbarrow, D. (2005). Architectures unscripted performativity. In: B, Kolarević (Ed.), Performative architecture beyond instrumentality, Spoon press, pp. 5-19.
Lefebvre, P. (2017). What differences could pragmatism have made? From Architectural effects to Architecture’s consequences, FOOTPRINT, pp. 23-36.
Marx, K. (1859). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1859.
Rabeneck, A., Sheppard, D., Town, P, (1973). Housing Flexibility?, Architectural Design, 43, London: Wiley, pp. 698-727.
Remoy, H. and Van Der Voord, T. (2009). SUSTAINABILITY BY ADAPTABLE AND FUNCTIONALLY NEUTRAL BUILDINGS Paper presented at SASBE 2009, 3rd CIB International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Built Environments, Delft.
Schumacher, P. (2013). Free Market Urbanism - Urbanism beyond Planning, Masterplanning the Adaptive City – Computational Urbanism in the Twenty-First Century, ed. Tom Verebes, New York: Routledge.
Smithson, A. and Smithson P. (1968). Urban infrastructure in: Team 10 Primer, ed. Alison Smithson Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 48-73.
Spencer, D. (2016). The Architecture of Neo-liberalism, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp.106-121.
Steiner, H, (2005). Architecture of well serviced environment, ARQ, No. 9, pp.133-143.
Tafuri, M. (1980). Theories and History of Architecture. New York: Harper & Row.
Till, J. and Schenider, T. (2005). Flexible housing: opportunities and limits, ARQ, June 2005. pp. 157-166.
Till, J. and Schenider, T. (2005). Flexible housing: the means to the end, ARQ, September 2005. pp. 287-296.
Hensel, M. (2010). Performativity-oriented architecture towards a biological paradigm for architectural design and the built environment. FORMakademisk, 3. pp. 36-56.
Hertzberger, H. (1991). Lessons For Students In Architecture (I. Rike, Trans.) Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
Hertzberger, H (1991), Diagoon houses, Delft, A&U, pp. 66-71.
Space Management Group, Promoting Spatial Efficiency in Building design, UK, 2006
International Energy Agency (IEA), Energy efficiency requirements in building codes, energy efficiency policies for new buildings, 2008.
