Perceived role of pharmacists in managing home-based pharmaceutical services in Norway: an interview study with community pharmacists

  • Ivana Bustic Apotek 1, Norway
  • Ivana Zimonjić University of Belgrade – Faculty of Pharmacy, Department for Social Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Legislation, Belgrade, Serbia; Galenika ad Beograd, Batajnički drum bb, Zemun, Serbia
  • Valentina Marinkovic University of Belgrade – Faculty of Pharmacy, Department for Social Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Legislation, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: pharmaceutical services, pharmacy practice, home care, primary healthcare crisis, patient safety

Abstract


Pharmacists have the potential to address gaps in primary healthcare by providing pharmaceutical services in home care settings, particularly in response to the challenges faced by the Norwegian healthcare system. Their integration into primary care teams could enhance care quality, reduce the burden on physicians, and improve treatment accessibility and efficiency, as demonstrated in other countries. This study explores pharmacists’ perspectives on the challenges and opportunities associated with implementing pharmaceutical home care services in Norway, considering international experiences and trends. A qualitative study was conducted between July and August 2024, involving interviews with pharmacists from various Norwegian pharmacies. Transcripts were analysed to identify categories and themes. Ten pharmacists participated, and the data were structured into 19 categories grouped into six themes: (i) the concept and implementation of home pharmaceutical services, (ii) benefits, (iii) challenges, (iv) impact on daily practice and training needs, (v) evaluation and teamwork, and (vi) patient outcomes and the use of digital tools. Findings indicate that home-based pharmaceutical services could improve healthcare quality in Norway, but their implementation involves challenges such as resource limitations and training needs. Recommendations include developing targeted strategies and support mechanisms to overcome these barriers, in order to ensure optimal benefits while maintaining high standards in pharmaceutical home care services.

References

Population projections for Norway [Internet]. Statistics Norway (SSB); 2023 [cited 2025 Aug 8]. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/list/folkemengde.

World Health Organization. Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide. Geneva, 2007.

Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet. 2009;374(9696):1196–208.

The 2021 Ageing Report: Economic and Budgetary Projections for the EU Member States (2019–2070) [Internet]. European Economy Institutional Paper 148. European Commission; 2020 [cited 2025 Aug 8]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2021-ageing-report-economic-and-budgetary-projections-eu-member-states-2019-2070_en.

Hermann M, Carstens N, Kvinge L, Fjell A, Wennersberg M, Folleso K, et al. Polypharmacy and potential drug–drug interactions in home-dwelling older people–a cross-sectional study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Mar 9;14:589-97.

Payne RA, Avery AJ. Polypharmacy: one of the greatest prescribing challenges in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(583):83–4.

Reeve E, Gnjidic D, Long J, Hilmer S. A systematic review of the emerging definition of ‘deprescribing’ with network analysis: implications for future research and clinical practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80(6):1254–68.

Zhang Y, Peng J, Sun W, Zhang H, Yang G. Analysing Home Pharmaceutical Care Under the Combination of Medical Care and Nursing. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023;16:1793–800.

Status for allmennlegeordningen i Norge [Internet]. Helsedirektoratet; 2022 [cited 2025 Aug 8]. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/rapporter/status-for-allmennlegeordningen-i-norge-2022.

Abelsen B, Gaski M, Brandstorp H. Stability and change: A study of the rural general practitioner workforce in Norway. Rural Remote Health. 2020;20(4):5742.

Iversen HK, Bjertnæs ØA, Holmboe O. Pasienterfaringer med fastlegen og fastlegekontoret i 2018/19. PasOpp-rapport. Oslo; 2019.

Gillespie U, Alassaad A, Henrohn D, Garmo H, Hammarlund-Udenaes M, Toss H, et al. A comprehensive pharmacist intervention to reduce morbidity in patients 80 years or older: a randomized controlled trial. Archives Intern Med. 2009 May 11;169(9):894–900.

Hayhoe B, Cespedes JA, Foley K, Majeed A, Ruzangi J, Greenfield G. Impact of integrating pharmacists into primary care teams on health systems indicators: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Oct 1;69(687):e665–74.

Strand LM, Cipolle RJ, Morley PC, Frakes MJ. The impact of pharmaceutical care practice on the practitioner and the patient in the ambulatory practice setting: twenty-five years of experience. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10(31):3987-4001.

Abbott RA, Moore DA, Rogers M, Bethel A, Stein K, Coon JT. Effectiveness of pharmacist home visits for individuals at risk of medication-related problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;20:1–5.

MacKeigan LD, Nissen LM. Clinical pharmacy services in the home. Dis Manag Health Out. 2008 Apr;16:227–44.

Hazen AC, de Bont AA, Leendertse AJ, Zwart DL, de Wit NJ, de Gier JJ, Bouvy ML. How clinical integration of pharmacists in general practice has impact on medication therapy management: a theory-oriented evaluation. Int J Integr Care. 2019 Jan 2;19(1):1.

Bø KE, Halvorsen KH, Le AY, Lehnbom EC. Barriers and facilitators of pharmacists’ integration in a multidisciplinary home care team: a qualitative interview study based on the normalization process theory. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 2;24(1):567.

Farmasøytiske tjenester i apotek [Internet]. Apotekforeningen [cited 2025 Aug 8]. Available from: https://www.apotekforeningen.no/farmasoytiske-tjenester-i-apotek.

Svedahl ER, Pape K, Toch-Marquardt M, Skarshaug LJ, Kaspersen SL, Bjørngaard JH, Austad B. Increasing workload in Norwegian general practice – a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0952-5.

Halvorsen KH, Ruths S, Granas AG, Viktil KK. Multidisciplinary intervention to identify and resolve drug-related problems in Norwegian nursing homes. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010;28(2):82–8. doi:10.3109/02813431003765455.

Romøren TI, Torjesen DO, Landmark B. Promoting coordination in Norwegian health care. Int J Integr Care.2011;11(Spec 10th Anniversary Ed):e127. doi: 10.5334/ijic.581.

Hoen BT, Abrahamsen DR, Berntsen ØI. Hjemmetjenestens målgrupper og organisering [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Aug 8]. https://www.ssb.no/helse/helsetjenester/ artikler/hjemmetjenestens-malgrupper-og-organisering/_/attachment/ inline/5ea6b71e-b190-448d-87f3-9d5a37c4c1b7:4a3a69163f46c0efd6e71e7a d2ce9f1ccf3e4863/RAPP2023-05.pdf.

Helgheim BI, Sandbaek B. Who is doing what in Home Care services? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(19):10504. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910504.

Svedahl ER, Pape K, Toch-Marquardt M et al. Increasing workload in Norwegian general practice – a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0952-5.

Andberg L, Munkerud MW, Nilsen M, Viktil KK. Legemiddelhåndtering. 8th ed. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2022.

Woodend AK, Lawrence JA. Reimbursement for home care pharmacy—current status and future strategies. Can Pharm J. 2005 May;138(4):40–5.

Houle SK, Grindrod KA, Chatterley T, Tsuyuki RT. Paying pharmacists for patient care: a systematic review of remunerated pharmacy clinical care services. Can Pharm J. 2014 Jul;147(4):209–32.

Bennett MS, Blank D, Bopp J, James JA, Osterhaus MC. Strategies to improve compensation for pharmaceutical care services. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2000 Nov–Dec;40(6):747–55.

Baldoni S, Amenta F, Ricci G. Telepharmacy services: present status and future perspectives: a review. Medicina. 2019 Jul 1;55(7):327.

Niznik JD, He H, Kane-Gill SL. Impact of clinical pharmacist services delivered via telemedicine in the outpatient or ambulatory care setting: a systematic review. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Aug 1;14(8):707–17.

Larsen HG, Adu P. The theoretical framework in phenomenological research: development and application. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2022. eBook ISBN: 9781003084259.

Goodman LA. Snowball Sampling. Ann Math Stat. 1961;32:148–70.

Busetto L, Wick W, Gumbinger C. How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurol Res Pract. 2020 May 27;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z.

Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–97.

Burla L, Knierim B, Barth J, Liewald K, Duetz M, Abel T. From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis. Nurs Res. 2008;57(2):113–7.

McKeirnan KC, Frazier KR, Keown B. Implementing pharmacist-led patient home visits. J Contemp Pharm Pract. 2020 Sep 1;66(4):11–5.

MacKeigan LD, Nissen LM. Clinical pharmacy services in the home. Dis Manag Health Out. 2008 Apr;16:227–44.

Flanagan PS, Barns A. Current perspectives on pharmacist home visits: do we keep reinventing the wheel? Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2018 Oct 1;7:141–59.

Hunter KA, Florio ER, Langberg RG. Pharmaceutical care for home-dwelling elderly persons: A determination of need and program description. Gerontologist. 1996 Aug 1;36(4):543–50.

Villanueva-Bueno C, Collado-Borrell R, Rodríguez-González CG, Escudero-Vilaplana V, Chamorro-de-Vega E, Ais-Larisgoitia A, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a home pharmaceutical care model through Telepharmacy. Farm Hosp. 2022 Oct 30;46(7):36–46.

Locca JF, Ruggli M, Buchmann M, Huguenin J, Bugnon O. Development of pharmaceutical care services in nursing homes: practice and research in a Swiss canton. Pharm World Sci. 2009 Apr;31:165–73.

Sebaaly J, Parsons LB, Pilch NA, Bullington W, Hayes GL, Piasterling H. Clinical and financial impact of pharmacist involvement in discharge medication reconciliation at an academic medical center: a prospective pilot study. Hosp Pharm. 2015 Jun;50(6):505–13.

Blueprint alliance for a future workforce strategy on digital and greenskills [Internet]. Green and digital skills to improve health outcomes. 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 8]. Available from: https://bewell-project.eu/.

BetterCare project [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 8]. Available from: https://cost-bettercare.eu/.

Zimonjić I, Marinković V, Mira JJ, Djokic BB, Odalović M. Addressing the second victim phenomenon among community pharmacists and its impact on clinical pharmacy practice: a consensus study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2025;Feb;47(1):68–79.

Zimonjić I, Marinković V, Mira JJ, Knežević B, Djokic BB, Bogavac-Stanojević N, Odalović M. The second victim experience and support tool: a cross-cultural adaptation, validation and psychometric evaluation of the Serbian version for pharmacy professionals (SR-SVEST-R). Int J Clin Pharm. 2025;47(3):803–814.

Zimonjić I, Marinković V, Jocić D, Dražeta L, Odalović M. Perceived importance of tailored education to prevent second victim phenomenon in clinical pharmacy practice: a focus group study with community pharmacists [Internet]. Int J Clin Pharm [Preprint]. 2025 [cited 2025 Aug 8]. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-5920957/v1.

Published
2025/08/31
Section
Original scientific paper