Storytelling as an Act of Subversion: Call for Action in Hulu’s TV Series The Handmaid’s Tale
Abstract
The article focuses on the comparative analysis of Margaret Atwood’s 1985 novel and Bruce Miller’s (2017) TV adaptation of The Handmaid’s Tale. Special attention in the paper is given to the construction of the main character’s identity in the respective media, most particularly the fact that in the Hulu series (2017-2022) the main character is depicted as a modern feminist activist constantly offering resistance to repressive ideology, unlike in the novel in which her new identity completely erases memories of prior existence and is compliant with inhuman treatment in Gilead. Just like Atwood, Miller applies the strategy of the interior monologue and intensifies its impact by using voice-over narration and italic subtitles that turn the audience into a secret confidante and willing ally in the main character’s struggle against repressive heteronormative and misogynist rules. This thought-provoking platform of expression is purposefully used by Miller in order to emphasize the importance of storytelling as a subversive act of resistance. With the help of Atwood herself, who has been collaborating with the series cast, producers, and director in screenwriting, this TV adaptation draws attention to contemporary issues of political conflicts, sexual slavery, war, toxic pollution, poverty, LGBTQ, women’s rights, as well as the need to address these issues and ultimately influence a long-craved social reform. The theoretical framework of the research relies on the concepts of transmedial narratology as elaborated by Thon (2015, 2016), Ryan (2014), Rajewski (2005), Gobyn (2019) and others.
References
Atwood, Margaret. (1985). The Handmaid’s Tale. Houghton Mifin Harcourt.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/20719313.
Bolter, J. D. & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding New Media. MIT Press.
Der-Ohannesian, N. (2021). Female Negotiations of Affect in Domestic and Public Space in the Television Series The Handmaid’s Tale. Ilha Do Desterro 74, no. 1: 578-588. Accessed February 25, 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/ 2175-8026.2021.e75830
Gobyn, S. (2019). ’I tell, herefore you are’: identity in The Handmaid’s Tale: a comparison between the novel and the series. EKPHRASIS - IMAGES CINEMA THEORY MEDIA, 22(2): 73–93. Accessed March 10, 2022. https://doi.org/10.24193/ekphrasis.22.5
Hershman, O. (2018). Oppression, Storytelling, and Resistance in Hulu’s The Handmaid’s Tale. Digital Literature Review, 5: 55–66. Accessed March 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.33043/DLR.5.0.55-66
Hogsette, D. S. (1997). Margaret Atwood’s Rhetorical Epilogue In The Handmaid’s Tale: The
Reader’s Role in Empowering June’s Speech Act. Critique: Studies in Contemporary
Fiction, vol. 38, no. 4: 262–278. Accessed February 23, 2022. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1080/00111619.1997.10543180.
Rajewsky, I. (2005). Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on
Intermediality. Intermédialités: histoire et théorie des arts, des letres et des techniques/
Intermediality: History and Theory of the Arts, Literature and Technologies, no. 6: 43–64.
Ryan, M. L. (2014). Story/World/Media: Tuning the Instruments of a Media-Conscious
Narratology. In M.L. Ryan & J.N. Thon (eds.), Storyworlds Across Media: Toward a Media-Conscious Narratology (pp. 25–49). University of Nebraska Press.
Thon, J. N. (2015). Narratives across Media and the Outlines of a Media-conscious Narratology. In G. Rippl (ed.), Handbook of Intermediality. Literature, Image, Sound, Music (pp. 439–56). Berlin: De
Gruyter.
Thon, J. N. (2016). Transmedial Narratology and Contemporary Media Culture. University of Nebraska
Press.
Copyright
Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.
Licensing
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original.
Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in CM: Communication and Media and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Self-archiving policy
Authors are permitted to deposit author’s publisher's version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author's personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), at any time after publication.
Full bibliographic information (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages) about the original publication must be provided and links must be made to the article's DOI and the license.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in the published works do not express the views of the Editors and the Editorial Staff. The authors take legal and moral responsibility for the ideas expressed in the articles. Publisher shall have no liability in the event of issuance of any claims for damages. The Publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.