COERCION RATES IN DIFFERENT MENTAL HEALTH CARE MODELS: EXPERIENCES FROM RECOVER-E PROJECT SAMPLES IN MONTENEGRO

  • Dr Jovo Dedovic Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5114-0498
  • Tatijana Djurisic Health Promotion Center, Public Health Institute of Montenegro
  • Dr Aleksandar Tomcuk Department of Mental Health Promotion, Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor
  • Dr Danijela Miladinovic Department of Acute Psychiatry, Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor
  • Dr Sandra Vlahovic Department of Addiction Treatment, Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor
  • Dr Aleksandar Macic Chief Executive Office, Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor
  • Dr Vasko Roganovic Mental Health Center, Health Center Budva
  • Ben Wijnen Center for Economic Evaluation and Machine Learning, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht
Keywords: FACT, CMHT, mental, ilness, readmission

Abstract


In 2018, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro, within the Horizon 2020 program. After conducting a thorough situation analysis of the setting and circumstances of treatment of patients with severe mental illnesses, the community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor was established. This team became responsible for the management of treatment of a group of users with severe mental health illnesses, based on the principles of „Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT – A Dutch model). The main objective of this research was to establish whether there were substantial differences regarding the use of coercive measures during the hospital readmissions in the group of patients treated by the CMHT, compared to usual mental health care in Montenegro.

Materials and methods: A sample of 202 users of mental health services from Kotor and surrounding municipalities were recruited. Patients were randomized into two similar-sized groups - the intervention group, whose treatment was managed by the multidisciplinary CMHT, and the control group where treatment, as usual, was continued. To estimate and follow up the frequency of application of coercive measures, hospital documentation was used. Mac Arthur Admission Experience Survey has been used after completion of the study to explore the individual levels of perceived coercion during hospital readmissions.

Results: Patients in the intervention group had statistically significant less coercive intervention (such are mechanical restraining and forced medication) during the study. There were no other significant differences between the t

In 2018, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro, within the Horizon 2020 program. After conducting a thorough situation analysis of the setting and circumstances of treatment of patients with severe mental illnesses, the community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor was established. This team became responsible for the management of treatment of a group of users with severe mental health illnesses, based on the principles of „Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT – A Dutch model). The main objective of this research was to establish whether there were substantial differences regarding the use of coercive measures during the hospital readmissions in the group of patients treated by the CMHT, compared to usual mental health care in Montenegro.

Materials and methods: A sample of 202 users of mental health services from Kotor and surrounding municipalities were recruited. Patients were randomized into two similar-sized groups - the intervention group, whose treatment was managed by the multidisciplinary CMHT, and the control group where treatment, as usual, was continued. To estimate and follow up the frequency of application of coercive measures, hospital documentation was used. Mac Arthur Admission Experience Survey has been used after completion of the study to explore the individual levels of perceived coercion during hospital readmissions.

Results: Patients in the intervention group had statistically significant less coercive intervention (such are mechanical restraining and forced medication) during the study. There were no other significant differences between the two groups regarding the total number of readmissions and number of hospital days.

Conclusion: This study showed that CMHT care could reduce some of the coercive measures during the treatment of severe mental illnesses, which can lead to the increased perceived quality of care and better treatment adherence.

Keywords: FACT, CMHT, mental, illness, readmission.                                                          

References

Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, Saraceno B. The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:858–66. doi:/S0042-96862004001100011.

Vos T. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. www.thelancet.com Lancetthelancet.com. 2016;388:1545–602.

Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1993;16:11–23. doi:10.1037/h0095655.

Westen KH, van Vugt MD, Bähler M, Mulder CL, Delespaul PH, Kroon H. FACT als onderdeel van wijkgerichte zorg in het (zorg)netwerk [Flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) as part of a community (health) network]. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2020;62(4):298-303. Dutch. PMID: 32388852.

Caldas Almeida J, Mateus P, Tomé G, Katschnig H, Hinkov H, Sooniste I, et al. Joint Action on Mental Health and Well-being, Towards Community- Based and Socially Inclusive Mental Health Care, Situation Analysis and Recommendations for Action. 2016. http://www.mentalhealthandwellbeing.eu/assets/docs/publications/WP5 Final-20151203075843.pdf.

Braun P, Kochansky G, Shapiro R, Greenberg S, Gudeman JE, Johnson S, et al. Overview: Deinstitutionalization of psychiatric patients, a critical review of outcome studies. Am J Psychiatry. 1981;138:736–49.

Conway M, et al. A companion to purchasing mental health services. Cambridge Angl Oxford Reg Heal Auth. 1994.

Bond GR, Drake RE, Mueser KT, Latimer E. Assertive Community Treatment for People with Severe Mental Illness. Dis Manag Heal Outcomes. 2001;9:141–59. http://link.springer.com/10.2165/00115677-200109030-00003. Accessed 23 Jan 2016.

Trieman N, Leff J, Glover G. Outcome of long stay psychiatric patients resettled in the community: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 1999;319:13–6. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7201.13.

Toyama M, Castillo H, Galea JT, Brandt LR, Mendoza M, Herrera V, et al. Peruvian Mental Health Reform: A Framework for Scaling-up Mental Health Services. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.07.

Caldas de Almeida J, Killaspy H. Long Term Mental Health Care for People with Severe Mental Disorders. 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/health/mental_health/docs/healthcare_mental_disorders_en.pdf.

Leff J, Dayson D, Gooch C, Thornicroft G, Wills W. Quality of life of long-stay patients discharged from two psychiatric institutions. Psychiatr Serv. 1996;47:62–7.

Leff J, Trieman N. Long-stay patients discharged from psychiatric hospitals: Social and clinical outcomes after five years in the community. The TAPS Project 46. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;176 MAR.:217–23.

Lund C, Tomlinson M, De Silva M, Fekadu A, Shidhaye R, Jordans M, et al. PRIME: A Programme to Reduce the Treatment Gap for Mental Disorders in Five Low- and Middle-Income Countries. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001359. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001359.

Nicaise P, Dubois V, Lorant V. Mental health care delivery system reform in Belgium: The challenge of achieving deinstitutionalisation whilst addressing fragmentation of care at the same time. Health Policy (New York). 2014;115:120–7. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.02.007.

Steinert T, Lepping P, Bernhardsgrütter R, Conca A, Hatling T, Janssen W, Keski-Valkama A, Mayoral F, Whittington R (2010) Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends. Soc Psy- chiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 45:889–897. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00127-009-0132-3

Lepping P, Masood B, Flammer E, Noorthoorn EO (2016) Com- parison of restraint data from four countries. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 51:1301–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00127-016-1203-x

Pelto-Piri V, Kjellin L, Hylén U, Valenti E, Priebe S (2019) Different forms of informal coercion in psychiatry: a qualitative study. BMC Res Notes 12:787. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13104-019-4823-x

Adorjan K, Steinert T, Flammer E, Deister A, Koller M, Zinkler M et al (2017) Coercive measures in German hospitals for psychiatry and psychotherapy: a pilot study by the DGPPN to evaluate a uniform assessment instrument. Nervenarzt 88:802–810. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00115-016-0261-3

Aagaard J, Tuszewski B, Kølbæk P. Does Assertive Community Treatment Reduce the Use of Compulsory Admissions? Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Dec;31(6):641-646. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Aug 10. PMID: 29179833.

Nielsen CM, Hjorthøj C, Killaspy H, Nordentoft M. The effect of flexible assertive community treatment in Denmark: a quasi-experimental controlled study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;8(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30424-7. Epub 2020 Oct 19. PMID: 33091344.

Huber M, Stanciole A, Wahlbec K, Tamsma N, Torres F, Jelfs E, et al. Quality in and Equality of Access to Healthcare Services. 2008.

Shields-Zeeman L, Petrea I, Smit F, Walters BH, Dedovic J, Kuzman MR, Nakov V, Nica R, Novotni A, Roth C, Tomcuk A, Wijnen BFM, Wensing M. Towards community-based and recovery-oriented care for severe mental disorders in Southern and Eastern Europe: aims and design of a multi-country implementation and evaluation study (RECOVER-E). Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Apr 22;14:30. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00361-y. PMID: 32336984; PMCID: PMC7178587.

Wijnen BFM, Smit F, Uhernik AI, Istvanovic A, Dedovic J, Dinolova R, Nica R, Velickovski R, Wensing M, Petrea I, Shields-Zeeman L. Sustainability of Community-Based Specialized Mental Health Services in Five European Countries: Protocol for Five Randomized Controlled Trial-Based Health-Economic Evaluations Embedded in the RECOVER-E Program. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jun 1;9(6):e17454. doi: 10.2196/17454. PMID: 32476658; PMCID: PMC7296406.

Đedović J, Tomčuk A, Miladinović D, Vlahović S, Ðurišić T. Multidisciplinarni timovi mentalnog zdravlja u zajednici u tretmanu teških duševnih oboljenja u Crnoj Gori - RECOVER-E projekat. Engrami. 2019;41(1):101-13. doi: 10.5937/engrami1901102Q

Gardner W, Hoge SK, Bennett N, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Monahan J, Mulvey EP. Two scales for measuring patients' perceptions for coercion during mental hospital admission. Behav Sci Law. 1993 Summer;11(3):307-21. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370110308. PMID: 10150233.

Trajanović NN, Đurić V, Latas M, Milovanović S, Jovanović AA, Đurić D. Srpski prevod torontske skale aleksitimije sa 20 pitanja - psihometrijske karakteristike i novi metodološki pristup u prevođenju upitnika. Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo. 2013;141(5-6):366-70. doi: 10.2298/SARH1306366T

Steinert T, Birk M, Flammer E, Bergk J. Subjective distress after seclusion or mechanical restraint: one-year follow-up of a randomized controlled study. Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Oct;64(10):1012-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200315. PMID: 23771400.

Hotzy F, Jaeger M. Clinical Relevance of Informal Coercion in Psychiatric Treatment-A Systematic Review. Front Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 12;7:197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00197. PMID: 28018248; PMCID: PMC5149520.

Published
2022/03/16
How to Cite
Dedovic, J., Djurisic, T., Tomcuk, A., Miladinovic, D., Vlahovic, S., Macic, A., Roganovic, V., & Wijnen, B. (2022). COERCION RATES IN DIFFERENT MENTAL HEALTH CARE MODELS: EXPERIENCES FROM RECOVER-E PROJECT SAMPLES IN MONTENEGRO. Engrami, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.5937/engrami43-35778
Section
ORIGINAL ARTICLES