Empirical analysis of Macedonian export structure: the role of metal industry

Darko Lazarov; Mitko Kocovski

doi:10.5937/industrija45-12015

Darko Lazarov University "Goce Delchev", Stip
Mitko Kocovski Makstil a.d Skopje

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/industrija45-12015

Keywords: Economic Growth, Macedonian, Export,

Abstract

The paper investigates the Macedonian export structure and export performance by using several indexes: product complexity, export sophistication, export diversity, and export ubiquity for the period 1995-2014. The empirical analysis is based on the application of product space methodology (based on network theory) developed by Hidalgo et al. (2007) with data from UN comtrade database. Moreover, the paper analyzes the performance of metal industry and its productivity as one of the biggest exporting sector and investigates its capacity for further product diversification. The estimated results indicate that Macedonian export basket is highly concentrated (the top ten products have nearly half of the total country’s export and more than 70 percent of the export goes to several countries) and more importantly the export structure is composed of products with low complexity level. Additionally, the results show that the export structure is less diversified, making the economy very sensitive on the external shocks. On the other side, the analysis of metal industry performance indicates that this industry has comparative advantages (RCA=2.16) and more importantly it has strong capacity for further diversification by building new capabilities for production of more complexed products. So, the suggestion to policymakers in Macedonia is to be created an active industrial policy that will stimulate the structural transformation of metal industry towards products with higher value added.

Author Biographies

Darko Lazarov, University "Goce Delchev", Stip

His main scientific and research interests are Financial and International Macroeconomics, Industrial Economics and Economic Growth and Development. His has realized several research studies at Bologna University; High School of Economics -Moscow; Jaume I, Spain. His is actively involved in few research projects in Macedonian Academy of Science and Macedonian Chamber of Commerce. He has attended Advanced Macroeconomic course at Macedonian National Bank organized by CERGE, Prague. He also has been part of many international scientific conferences

Mitko Kocovski, Makstil a.d Skopje

He is director of strategic planing and research departmant at Makstil a.d Skopje. He has been a visting professor at University "Goce Delcev" Stip for a five years (2009-2014). Now, he is a visiting professor at University of Tourism and Managment - Skopje.

References

Ahmad, J., Harnhirun, S. and Yang, J. (1997) Export and economic growth in the ASEAN countries: cointegration and causality tests.International Review of Economics and Business 44, 419-30.

Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalisation and "Revealed" Comparative Advantage. Manchester School, 33(2), 99-123. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x

Chow, P.C.Y. (1987) Causality between export growth and industrial development: empirical evidence fromthe NICs. Journal of Development Economics 26, 55-63.

Darrat, A.F. (1987) Are exports an engine of growth? Another look at the evidence. Applied Economics 19, 277-83.

Islam, M.N. (1998) Export expansion and economic growth: testing for cointegration and causality. Applied Economics 30, 415-25.

Islam, M.N. and Iftekharuzzaman, M. (1996) Export-growth nexus in a small open economy: the case of Bangladesh. In Weis, C.E. and Wahid, A.N.M. (eds.) The Economy of Bangladesh: Problems andnProspects. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishing

Jesus, F., Kumar, U., & Abdon, A. (2010). Exports, Capabilities, and Industrial Policy in India. Working Paper, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY, 638, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.

Liu, X., Song, H. and Romilly, P. (1997) An empirical investigation of the causal relationship between openness and economic growth in China. Applied Economics 29, 1679-86

Keesing, D..B. (1967) Outward-looking policies and economic development=. Economic Journal 77, 303-20

Krueger, A.O. (1985) The experience and lessons of Asia superexporters. In Corbo,V., Krueger, A.O. and Ossa, F. (eds.) Export-oriented Development Strategies: The Success of Five Newly Industrialized Countries. London: Westview Press

Siggell, (2007). International Competitiveness and Comparative Advantage: A Survey and a Proposal for Measurement. Center for Economic Studies / Ifo Institute. Retrieved from https://www.cesifogroup.de/portal/pls/portal/!PORTAL.wwpob_page.show?_docname=956160.PDF

Shan, J. and Sun, F. (1998a) Export-led growth hypothesis for Australia: an empirical re-investigation. Applied Economics Letters 5, 423-8.

Shan, J. and Sun, F. (1998b) On the export-led growth hypothesis: the econometric evidence from China. Applied Economics 30, 1055-65.

Shan, J. and Sun, F. (1998c) ‘On the export-led growth hypothesis for the little dragons: an empirical reinvestigation’. Atlantic Economic Journal 26, 353-71.

Thornton, J. (1996) Cointegration, causality and export-led growth in Mexico, 1895- 1992'. Economics Letters 50, 413-6.

Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 1-25. doi:10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4

Hausmann, R., & Bailey, K. (2006). Structural Transformation and Patterns of Comparative Advantage. CID Working Paper, 128, Center for International Development, Harvard University.

Hidalgo, C.A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482-7. pmid:17656717. doi:10.1126/science.1144581

Hidalgo, C. (2009). The Dynamics of Economic Complexity and the Product Space Over a 42 Year Period. Center for International Development at Harvard University. Working Paper, 189, December. Harvard University.

Hidalgo, C., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570-10575.